Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Lexington · United States

Dynamic Object Language Labs

dollabs.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
9
▲ 44% vs 2018-21
Citations
121
13.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
8%
world 40%
International
36%
world 18%
Dynamic Object Language Labs

Not ranked overall: Dynamic Object Language Labs is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Dynamic Object Language Labs work in?

In all years, 78% of research at Dynamic Object Language Labs is in Physical Sciences, 10% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (64%), Engineering (14%), Medicine (8%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 78.2% of its workComputer Science: 6 fractional works · 64.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 2 fractional works · 20.9% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 2 fractional works · 20.3% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 9.2% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 5.0% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSoftware: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 13.9% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 1 fractional works · 10.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.1% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 8.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 6.1% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.9% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKDynamic ObjectLanguage Labs9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences78%Health Sciences10%Social Sciences9%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 9 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science664.3%
    2. Engineering113.9%
    1. Medicine18.3%
    2. Health Professions01.8%
    1. Decision Sciences04.9%
    2. Psychology03.6%
    3. Social Sciences00.9%
    1. Neuroscience01.8%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Neuroscience: 7.35× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 3.96× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 4.49× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsDecision Sciences: 9.62× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 7.98× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 9.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences9.62×0 works
  2. Psychology7.98×0 works
  3. Neuroscience7.35×0 works
  4. Health Professions4.49×0 works
  5. Computer Science3.96×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.47×0 works
  7. Engineering0.39×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Dynamic Object Language Labs?

The most cited paper from Dynamic Object Language Labs is "Virtual mouse vision based interface" (Paul Robertson, Robert Laddaga, Max Van Kleek, 2004), with 40 citations. Next come "Comparative Value of NYHA Functional Class and Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Scores in Assessing Heart Failure" (23) and "The GRAVA self-adaptive architecture: history; design; applications; and challenges" (21).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Virtual mouse vision based interface Paul Robertson, Robert Laddaga, Max Van Kleek Conference paper 13 Jan 2004 40
2 Comparative Value of NYHA Functional Class and Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Scores in Assessing Heart Failure Leonidas V. Athanasopoulos, Athanasios Dritsas, Helen Doll et al. · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention Mar 2010 23
3 The GRAVA self-adaptive architecture: history; design; applications; and challenges Paul Robertson, Robert Laddaga Conference paper 2004 21
4 Autonomous, Collaborative Control for Resilient Cyber Defense (ACCORD) Stuart S. Wagner, Eric van den Berg, Jim Giacopelli et al. Conference paper Sep 2012 16
5 FUZZBUSTER: Towards Adaptive Immunity from Cyber Threats David J. Musliner, Jeffrey M. Rye, Dan Thomsen et al. Conference paper Oct 2011 13
All 19 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Dynamic Object Language Labs publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Embodied and Extended Cognition, Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis and Team Dynamics and Performance.

Embodied and Extended Cognition: 0 fractional worksReinforcement Learning in Robotics: 0 fractional worksCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis: 0 fractional worksTeam Dynamics and Performance: 0 fractional worksChild and Animal Learnin…0Child and Animal Learning Development: 0 fractional worksSocial Robot Interaction and HRI: 0 fractional worksSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications: 0 fractional worksHealth Education and Val…0Health Education and Validation: 0 fractional worksBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference: 0 fractional worksPatient Safety and Medication Errors: 0 fractional works
Cognitive NeuroscienceArtificial IntelligenceEmergency Medical ServicesSocial Psychology3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Embodied and Extended Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  2. 2 Reinforcement Learning in Robotics Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  3. 3 Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis Emergency Medical Services 0 works
  4. 4 Team Dynamics and Performance Social Psychology 0 works
  5. 5 Child and Animal Learning Development Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Social Robot Interaction and HRI Social Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications Control and Systems Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Health Education and Validation Education 0 works
  9. 9 Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  10. 10 Patient Safety and Medication Errors Emergency Medical Services 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available8.0%not open92.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors35.7%domestic only64.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Dynamic Object Language Labs's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 44% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting20052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Dynamic Object Language Labs as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000012% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Dynamic Object Language Labs0.0000082% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Dynamic Object Language Labs over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Lexington

All research institutions in Lexington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Dynamic Object Language Labs. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.