Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Lexington · United States

Institute for Learning and Development

In research, Institute for Learning and Development stands highest in Social Sciences (#1,151 of 16,945 worldwide), Social Sciences (#734 of 10,206 worldwide) and Education (#528 of 3,044 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, 2022–2025
#26,011
of 28,054 · #7,086 all time
Rank in United States
#3,926
of 4,192
Research works
1.5k
▼ 49% vs 2013–17
Citations
41k
26.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.3%
record average 16.5%
Open access
15%
world 28%

What is Institute for Learning and Development known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #1,151 of 16,945 25.5%1,123
Social SciencesField #734 of 10,206 27.2%689
EducationSubfield #528 of 3,044 30.8%409
Computer ScienceField #2,569 of 7,020 21.2%151
PsychologyField #1,658 of 3,744 25.1%179
Arts and HumanitiesField #1,739 of 3,836 25.9%166
Physical SciencesDomain #10,998 of 21,541 17.4%261

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for Learning and Development sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.34× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.15× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.84× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.43× its world share, 7 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.59× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsDentistry: 2.28× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 2.60× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.58× its world share, 7 worksMedicineNursing: 1.13× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.00× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.97× its world share, 6 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.88× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.93× its world share, 5 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.30× its world share, 18 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Business, Management and Accounting, 3.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Institute for Learning and Development?

Ranked on the composite score, Pedro Noguera, Timothy J. Johnson and Charlotte Linde lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Learning and Development.

  1. 1 Pedro Noguera United States · #36,857 worldwide 425 citations · 35 works
  2. 2 Timothy J. Johnson United States · #251,217 worldwide 16 citations · 46 works
  3. 3 Charlotte Linde United States · #317,470 worldwide 117 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Martin A. Simon United States · #332,964 worldwide 93 citations · 35 works
  5. 5 Orit Zaslavsky United States · #345,092 worldwide 89 citations · 40 works
  6. 6 Mark Schofield United States · #461,825 worldwide 98 citations · 33 works
  7. 7 Robert Cohen United States · #481,134 worldwide 30 citations · 54 works
  8. 8 Jay Gottlieb United States · #528,601 worldwide 53 citations · 23 works
  9. 9 Susan B. Neuman United States · #648,002 worldwide 118 citations · 105 works
  10. 10 Kristen Mastel United States · #703,475 worldwide 11 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Institute for Learning and Development

Which keywords describe research at Institute for Learning and Development?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Information Technology, Decision Making, Risk Assessment, Educational Technology, Operations Research, Production Management, Supply Chain Management and Online Learning.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Educational Technology4▲ 6.0×13 topics
  2. Information Technology4▲ 14×4 topics
  3. Decision Making4▲ 21×2 topics
  4. Risk Assessment4▲ 9.6×2 topics
  5. Supply Chain Management4▲ 6.6×2 topics
  6. Operations Research4▲ 34×1 topic
  7. Production Management4▲ 40×1 topic
  8. Education4▲ 3.4×17 topics
  9. Online Learning4▲ 6.9×7 topics
  10. Student Engagement3▲ 12×7 topics
  11. Machine Learning3▲ 1.40×10 topics
  12. Metacognition3▲ 28×3 topics
  13. Higher Education2▲ 7.7×9 topics
  14. Human Rights2▲ 4.0×5 topics
  15. Self-Regulation2▲ 24×2 topics
  16. Motivation2▲ 9.7×2 topics
  17. Collaborative Learning2▲ 48×1 topic
  18. E-Learning2▲ 3.5×10 topics
  19. Reflective Practice2▲ 18×4 topics
  20. Scaffolding2▲ 71×1 topic
  21. Learning Analytics2▲ 26×2 topics
  22. Instructional Design2▲ 38×3 topics
  23. Educational Data Mining2▲ 29×1 topic
  24. Massive Open Online Courses2▲ 29×1 topic
  25. Teaching Strategies2▲ 8.4×4 topics
  26. Professional Development1▲ 12×7 topics
  27. Equality1▲ 37×2 topics
  28. Lifelong Learning1▲ 10×4 topics
  29. Assessment Methods1▲ 19×3 topics
  30. Geotechnical Engineering1▲ 28×1 topic
  31. International Law1▲ 6.3×3 topics
  32. Primary Care1▲ 5.5×6 topics
  33. Public-Private Partnerships1▲ 27×2 topics
  34. Quality Assurance1▲ 11×2 topics
  35. Road Construction1▲ 41×1 topic
  36. Student Perceptions1▲ 11×5 topics
  37. Active Learning1▲ 9.7×3 topics
  38. Nursing Education1▲ 13×3 topics
  39. Patient Safety1▲ 12×2 topics
  40. Student Satisfaction1▲ 9.2×3 topics

Which research topics does Institute for Learning and Development publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Management and Optimization Techniques, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Online Learning and Analytics and Geotechnical and construction materials studies.

  1. 1 Management and Optimization Techniques Strategy and Management 4 works
  2. 2 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works
  3. 3 Online Learning and Analytics Computer Science Applications 2 works
  4. 4 Geotechnical and construction materials studies Civil and Structural Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Legal Issues in South Africa Law 1 works
  6. 6 Open Education and E-Learning Computer Science Applications 1 works
  7. 7 Global Educational Policies and Reforms Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  8. 8 Innovations in Medical Education Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
  9. 9 African history and culture analysis Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  10. 10 Occupational Health and Safety Management Occupational Therapy 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available14.9%not open85.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors11.3%domestic only88.7%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Institute for Learning and Development's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 49% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Lexington

All research institutions in Lexington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.