Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Brookline · United States

Foundation for Faces of Children

facesofchildren.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
18
▲ 30% vs 2013–17
Citations
19
1.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.3%
record average 16.5%
Open access
83%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Foundation for Faces of Children is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 0.86× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringPhysics and Astronomy: 1.00× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.69× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 5.10× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.16× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 5.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which research topics does Foundation for Faces of Children publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Latin American Literature Studies, Information Science and Libraries, Psychology and Mental Health and Health and Well-being Studies.

Latin American Literatur…1Latin American Literature Studies: 1 fractional worksInformation Science and …0Information Science and Libraries: 0 fractional worksPsychology and Mental He…0Psychology and Mental Health: 0 fractional worksHealth and Well-being Studies: 0 fractional worksPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction: 0 fractional worksLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies: 0 fractional worksMultilingual Education and Policy: 0 fractional worksHealth disparities and o…0Health disparities and outcomes: 0 fractional worksBorges, Kipling, and Jew…0Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity: 0 fractional worksSocial Sciences and Poli…0Social Sciences and Policies: 0 fractional works
Cultural StudiesInformation SystemsClinical PsychologySocial Psychology4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Latin American Literature Studies Cultural Studies 1 works
  2. 2 Information Science and Libraries Information Systems 0 works
  3. 3 Psychology and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
  4. 4 Health and Well-being Studies Clinical Psychology 0 works
  5. 5 Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Social Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies Linguistics and Language 0 works
  7. 7 Multilingual Education and Policy Linguistics and Language 0 works
  8. 8 Health disparities and outcomes Health 0 works
  9. 9 Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  10. 10 Social Sciences and Policies General Social Sciences 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available82.6%not open17.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors52.5%domestic only47.5%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Foundation for Faces of Children's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 30% higher than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Brookline

All research institutions in Brookline

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.