Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Chicago · United States

Foundation for Human Potential

In research, Foundation for Human Potential stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,295 of 9,585 worldwide), Medicine (#6,693 of 8,541 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#7,859 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now.

World rank, 2022-now
#12,433
of 22,385 · #8,621 all time
Rank in United States
#1,750
of 3,332
Research works
798
▲ 52% vs 2018-21
Citations
16k
20.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.82×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
28%
world 40%
International
29%
world 18%

What is Foundation for Human Potential known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #7,295 of 9,585 7.7%83 #9971
MedicineField #6,693 of 8,541 9.0%70 #3983
Health SciencesDomain #7,859 of 9,902 9.1%104 #4367

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Foundation for Human Potential sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Social Sciences#9,971 #7,295
  2. Medicine#3,983 #6,693
  3. Health Sciences#4,367 #7,859
all time2022-now, better2022-now, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

Which fields of science does Foundation for Human Potential work in?

In 2022-now, 47% of research at Foundation for Human Potential is in Social Sciences, 41% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (29%), Social Sciences (24%), Health Professions (11%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 132 fractional works · 46.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 67 fractional works · 24.0% of its workEducation: 30 fractional works · 10.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 13 fractional works · 4.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 10 fractional works · 3.4% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 3 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDemography: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workTransportation: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 21 fractional works · 7.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 10 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 5 fractional works · 1.7% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 3 fractional works · 1.2% of its workApplied Psychology: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 19 fractional works · 6.6% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 18 fractional works · 6.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workArts and Humanities: 18 fractional works · 6.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 5 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHistory: 4 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhilosophy: 3 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMuseology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMusic: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 5 fractional works · 1.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 116 fractional works · 41.2% of its workMedicine: 81 fractional works · 28.9% of its workSurgery: 11 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 7 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 6 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 5 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEpidemiology: 5 fractional works · 1.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 5 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNeurology: 4 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysiology: 4 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 4 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 3 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 3 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDermatology: 3 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRheumatology: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInfectious Diseases: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOncology: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGastroenterology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnatomy: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOphthalmology: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workReproductive Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 3 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Professions: 30 fractional works · 10.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 19 fractional works · 6.9% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 4 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPharmacy: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 4 fractional works · 1.3% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workResearch and Theory: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 19 fractional works · 6.7% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 10 fractional works · 3.4% of its workAquatic Science: 7 fractional works · 2.6% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiophysics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 3 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNeurology: 2 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workVirology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 15 fractional works · 5.3% of its workEngineering: 5 fractional works · 1.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 2 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOceanography: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKFoundation forHuman Potential281fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences5%Health Sciences41%Social Sciences47%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences6724.0%
    2. Psychology217.6%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance196.6%
    4. Arts and Humanities186.3%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting51.7%
    6. Decision Sciences20.6%
    1. Medicine8128.9%
    2. Health Professions3010.7%
    3. Nursing41.3%
    4. Dentistry10.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences103.4%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology41.4%
    3. Neuroscience31.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology20.8%
    1. Engineering51.9%
    2. Computer Science31.1%
    3. Environmental Science31.1%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.4%
    5. Materials Science10.2%
    6. Mathematics10.2%
    7. Chemistry00.1%
    8. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    9. Energy00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.73× its world share, 10 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.27× its world share, 4 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.77× its world share, 2 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.66× its world share, 3 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.14× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.25× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.13× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.22× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.07× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.21× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.43× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 4.06× its world share, 30 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.51× its world share, 81 worksMedicineNursing: 2.67× its world share, 4 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.19× its world share, 18 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.51× its world share, 5 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.64× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3.09× its world share, 19 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.50× its world share, 22 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.90× its world share, 68 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 23 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions4.06×30 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.09×19 works
  3. Nursing2.67×4 works
  4. Psychology2.50×22 works
  5. Arts and Humanities2.19×18 works
  6. Social Sciences1.90×68 works
  7. Medicine1.51×81 works
  8. Immunology and Microbiology0.77×2 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.73×10 works
  10. Neuroscience0.66×3 works
  11. Decision Sciences0.64×2 works
  12. Business, Management and Accounting0.51×5 works
  13. Dentistry0.43×1 works
  14. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.27×4 works
  15. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.25×1 works
  16. Environmental Science0.22×3 works
  17. Mathematics0.21×1 works
  18. Computer Science0.14×3 works
  19. Engineering0.13×5 works
  20. Chemistry0.09×0 works
  21. Materials Science0.07×1 works
  22. Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
  23. Energy0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Foundation for Human Potential?

Ranked on the quality score, David Scheller, Glenn Doman and Gudrun Helga Kissinger lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Foundation for Human Potential.

  1. 1 David Scheller United States · #2,045,968 worldwide 120 citations · 48 works
  2. 2 Glenn Doman United States · #4,845,326 worldwide 195 citations · 24 works
  3. 3 Gudrun Helga Kissinger United States · #5,107,215 worldwide 41 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Foundation for Human Potential

What are the most cited papers from Foundation for Human Potential?

The most cited paper from Foundation for Human Potential is "Classifying Esophageal Motility by Pressure Topography Characteristics: A Study of 400 Patients and 75 Controls" (John Erik Pandolfino, Sudip Kumar Ghosh, John P. Rice et al., 2008), with 414 citations. Next come "Mitochondrial DNA deletions and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis" (390) and "Mindfulness at Work: A New Approach to Improving Individual and Organizational Performance" (356).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Classifying Esophageal Motility by Pressure Topography Characteristics: A Study of 400 Patients and 75 Controls John Erik Pandolfino, Sudip Kumar Ghosh, John P. Rice et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2008 414
2 Mitochondrial DNA deletions and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis Graham R. Campbell, Iryna Ziabreva, Amy Katherine Reeve et al. · Annals of Neurology Open access 8 Nov 2010 390
3 Mindfulness at Work: A New Approach to Improving Individual and Organizational Performance Patrick K. Hyland, R. Andrew Lee, Maura J. Mills · Industrial and Organizational Psychology 15 Jul 2015 356
4 Cytomegalovirus Colitis Complicating Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ahmed Kandiel, Bret A. Lashner · The American Journal of Gastroenterology 6 Oct 2006 344
5 Chromoendoscopy-Targeted Biopsies Are Superior to Standard Colonoscopic Surveillance for Detecting Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Prospective Endoscopic Trial James F. Marion, Jerome D. Waye, Daniel H. Present et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology Sep 2008 288
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Foundation for Human Potential?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Pedagogy, Language Teaching, Tourism Development, Student Competencies, Teaching Methods, Entrepreneurship, Industrial Enterprises and Innovation Economics.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Pedagogy25▲ 18×4 topics
  2. Language Teaching23▲ 30×2 topics
  3. Tourism Development22▲ 57×2 topics
  4. Globalization22▲ 3.9×21 topics
  5. Student Competencies22▲ 117×1 topic
  6. Teaching Methods22▲ 47×1 topic
  7. Sustainability17▲ 2.5×8 topics
  8. Entrepreneurship17▲ 16×5 topics
  9. Economic Development16▲ 7.3×3 topics
  10. Industrial Enterprises16▲ 165×1 topic
  11. Innovation Economics16▲ 165×1 topic
  12. Primary Care16▲ 15×9 topics
  13. Epidemiology15▲ 1.34×55 topics
  14. Public Health14▲ 3.5×26 topics
  15. Education10▲ 2.0×23 topics
  16. Mental Health9▲ 2.2×19 topics
  17. Migration9▲ 9.4×7 topics
  18. Patient Satisfaction9▲ 9.9×7 topics
  19. Renewable Energy8▲ 2.1×6 topics
  20. Health Workforce7▲ 62×2 topics
  21. Irrigation7▲ 135×1 topic
  22. Postcolonialism7▲ 18×3 topics
  23. Water Efficiency7▲ 135×1 topic
  24. Global Governance7▲ 10×3 topics
  25. Biopolitics6▲ 29×1 topic
  26. Crisis Management6▲ 44×1 topic
  27. Social Sciences6▲ 16×5 topics
  28. Training6▲ 9.9×3 topics
  29. Meta-Analysis6▲ 3.5×13 topics
  30. Healthcare Systems6▲ 45×3 topics
  31. Collaborative Practice6▲ 49×2 topics
  32. Health Equity5▲ 6.6×3 topics
  33. Community Health5▲ 12×4 topics
  34. Advanced Practice Nursing5▲ 134×1 topic
  35. Nurse Practitioners5▲ 134×1 topic
  36. Health Policy5▲ 11×3 topics
  37. Quality Improvement5▲ 8.9×6 topics
  38. Advocacy4▲ 50×1 topic
  39. Nursing Education4▲ 10×4 topics
  40. Pediatrics4▲ 50×1 topic

Which research topics does Foundation for Human Potential publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Education, Innovation and Language Studies, Economic and Industrial Development, Engineering and Agricultural Innovations and Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies.

  1. 1 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 22 works
  2. 2 Economic and Industrial Development Economics and Econometrics 16 works
  3. 3 Engineering and Agricultural Innovations Aquatic Science 7 works
  4. 4 Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies Political Science and International Relations 6 works
  5. 5 Nursing Roles and Practices General Health Professions 5 works
  6. 6 Child and Adolescent Health General Health Professions 4 works
  7. 7 Social and Educational Sciences Education 3 works
  8. 8 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 2 works
  9. 9 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 2 works
  10. 10 linguistics and terminology studies Language and Linguistics 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available28.5%not open71.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.8%domestic only71.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Foundation for Human Potential's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 52% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Foundation for Human Potential as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00091% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Foundation for Human Potential0.00084% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Foundation for Human Potential over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting10%20%30%all institutions10.0% in 2025Foundation for Human Potential9.1% in 202520102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 22.8% in 2008.

Other research institutions in Chicago

All research institutions in Chicago

Share Foundation for Human Potential's ranking

Foundation for Human Potential on Science Explorer

A card with Foundation for Human Potential's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Foundation for Human Potential. Posts are plain text and can be reported.