Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Chicago · United States

Foundation for Human Potential

In research, Foundation for Human Potential stands highest in Health Sciences (#10,147 of 11,982 worldwide), Medicine (#9,389 of 10,443 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,988 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025.

explorefhp.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#24,344
of 28,054 · #14,807 all time
Rank in United States
#3,656
of 4,192
Research works
798
▲ 12% vs 2013–17
Citations
16k
20.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.7%
record average 16.5%
Open access
28%
world 28%

What is Foundation for Human Potential known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Health SciencesDomain #10,147 of 11,982 3.2%104 #4256
MedicineField #9,389 of 10,443 3.7%70 #6017
Social SciencesDomain #9,988 of 10,521 4.6%83 #11713

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Foundation for Human Potential sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Health Sciences#4,256 #10,147
  2. Medicine#6,017 #9,389
  3. Social Sciences#11,713 #9,988
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.31× its world share, 3 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.16× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.06× its world share, 2 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.72× its world share, 2 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.10× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.34× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.09× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.20× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.29× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 5.55× its world share, 30 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.78× its world share, 70 worksMedicineNursing: 3.49× its world share, 4 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.57× its world share, 9 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.58× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.71× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.35× its world share, 6 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.82× its world share, 18 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.71× its world share, 44 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Foundation for Human Potential?

Ranked on the composite score, Danijus Kazlauskas and Grzegorz Wasilewicz lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Foundation for Human Potential.

  1. 1 Danijus Kazlauskas · #1,631,302 worldwide 0 citations · 17 works
  2. 2 Grzegorz Wasilewicz · #1,633,848 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at Foundation for Human Potential

Which keywords describe research at Foundation for Human Potential?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Primary Care, Public Health, Pedagogy, Patient Satisfaction, Health Workforce, Tourism Development, Student Competencies and Teaching Methods.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Primary Care15▲ 20×9 topics
  2. Public Health14▲ 4.8×26 topics
  3. Epidemiology14▲ 1.72×54 topics
  4. Pedagogy10▲ 9.8×4 topics
  5. Education9▲ 2.6×21 topics
  6. Mental Health9▲ 3.0×19 topics
  7. Globalization9▲ 2.1×19 topics
  8. Patient Satisfaction8▲ 13×7 topics
  9. Health Workforce7▲ 84×2 topics
  10. Treatment7▲ 2.8×19 topics
  11. Tourism Development7▲ 28×2 topics
  12. Student Competencies6▲ 63×1 topic
  13. Teaching Methods6▲ 22×1 topic
  14. Quality of Life6▲ 2.0×22 topics
  15. Healthcare Systems6▲ 58×3 topics
  16. Collaborative Practice6▲ 67×2 topics
  17. Training6▲ 13×3 topics
  18. Health Equity5▲ 9.7×3 topics
  19. Community Health5▲ 16×4 topics
  20. Qualitative Research5▲ 3.0×11 topics
  21. Depression5▲ 2.9×10 topics
  22. Advanced Practice Nursing5▲ 184×1 topic
  23. Nurse Practitioners5▲ 184×1 topic
  24. Social Sciences5▲ 17×4 topics
  25. Health Policy5▲ 15×3 topics
  26. Meta-Analysis5▲ 3.9×12 topics
  27. Quality Improvement5▲ 12×6 topics
  28. Entrepreneurship4▲ 5.3×4 topics
  29. Well-being4▲ 5.3×7 topics
  30. Neurological Disorders4▲ 3.5×7 topics
  31. Advocacy4▲ 63×1 topic
  32. Pediatrics4▲ 63×1 topic
  33. Ethical Considerations4▲ 5.2×9 topics
  34. Learning4▲ 5.8×3 topics
  35. Nursing Education3▲ 12×4 topics
  36. Chronic Disease Management3▲ 8.3×3 topics
  37. Industrial Enterprises3▲ 76×1 topic
  38. Innovation Economics3▲ 76×1 topic
  39. Continuity of Care3▲ 29×2 topics
  40. Gender Studies3▲ 8.7×2 topics

Which research topics does Foundation for Human Potential publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Education, Innovation and Language Studies, Nursing Roles and Practices, Child and Adolescent Health and Economic and Industrial Development.

Education, Innovation an…6Education, Innovation and Language Studies: 6 fractional worksNursing Roles and Practices: 5 fractional worksChild and Adolescent Hea…4Child and Adolescent Health: 4 fractional worksEconomic and Industrial …3Economic and Industrial Development: 3 fractional worksSocial and Educational Sciences: 3 fractional worksPrimary Care and Health Outcomes: 2 fractional worksGlobal Health Workforce …2Global Health Workforce Issues: 2 fractional worksCognitive Abilities and Testing: 2 fractional worksAppalachian Studies and Mathematics: 2 fractional worksNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership: 2 fractional works
EducationGeneral Health ProfessionsEconomics and EconometricsEmergency Medical Services3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 6 works
  2. 2 Nursing Roles and Practices General Health Professions 5 works
  3. 3 Child and Adolescent Health General Health Professions 4 works
  4. 4 Economic and Industrial Development Economics and Econometrics 3 works
  5. 5 Social and Educational Sciences Education 3 works
  6. 6 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 2 works
  7. 7 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 2 works
  8. 8 Cognitive Abilities and Testing Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2 works
  9. 9 Appalachian Studies and Mathematics General Social Sciences 2 works
  10. 10 Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available28.5%not open71.5%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.8%domestic only71.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Foundation for Human Potential's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Chicago

All research institutions in Chicago

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.