Foundation for Human Potential
In research, Foundation for Human Potential stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,295 of 9,585 worldwide), Medicine (#6,693 of 8,541 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#7,859 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #12,433 of 22,385 · #8,621 all time
- Rank in United States
- #1,750 of 3,332
- Research works
- 798 ▲ 52% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 16k 20.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.82× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 28% world 40%
- International
- 29% world 18%
What is Foundation for Human Potential known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,295 of 9,585 | 7.7% | 83 | #9971 | |
| MedicineField | #6,693 of 8,541 | 9.0% | 70 | #3983 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #7,859 of 9,902 | 9.1% | 104 | #4367 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Foundation for Human Potential sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#9,971 #7,295
- Medicine#3,983 #6,693
- Health Sciences#4,367 #7,859
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Foundation for Human Potential work in?
In 2022-now, 47% of research at Foundation for Human Potential is in Social Sciences, 41% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (29%), Social Sciences (24%), Health Professions (11%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences13246.8%
- Social Sciences6724.0%
- Psychology217.6%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance196.6%
- Arts and Humanities186.3%
- Business, Management and Accounting51.7%
- Decision Sciences20.6%
- Health Sciences11641.2%
- Medicine8128.9%
- Health Professions3010.7%
- Nursing41.3%
- Dentistry10.2%
- Life Sciences196.7%
- Physical Sciences155.3%
- Engineering51.9%
- Computer Science31.1%
- Environmental Science31.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.4%
- Materials Science10.2%
- Mathematics10.2%
- Chemistry00.1%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Energy00.0%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 23 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions4.06×30 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.09×19 works
- Nursing2.67×4 works
- Psychology2.50×22 works
- Arts and Humanities2.19×18 works
- Social Sciences1.90×68 works
- Medicine1.51×81 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.77×2 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.73×10 works
- Neuroscience0.66×3 works
- Decision Sciences0.64×2 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.51×5 works
- Dentistry0.43×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.27×4 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.25×1 works
- Environmental Science0.22×3 works
- Mathematics0.21×1 works
- Computer Science0.14×3 works
- Engineering0.13×5 works
- Chemistry0.09×0 works
- Materials Science0.07×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
- Energy0.02×0 works
- Health Professions 4.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.1×
- Nursing 2.7×
- Psychology 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 2.2×
- Social Sciences 1.9×
- Medicine 1.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Energy 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Foundation for Human Potential?
Ranked on the quality score, David Scheller, Glenn Doman and Gudrun Helga Kissinger lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Foundation for Human Potential.
- 1
David Scheller
United States · #2,045,968 worldwide 120 citations · 48 works
- 2
Glenn Doman
United States · #4,845,326 worldwide 195 citations · 24 works
- 3
Gudrun Helga Kissinger
United States · #5,107,215 worldwide 41 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Foundation for Human Potential?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Pedagogy, Language Teaching, Tourism Development, Student Competencies, Teaching Methods, Entrepreneurship, Industrial Enterprises and Innovation Economics.
- Pediatrics
- Advocacy
- Health Policy
- Advanced Practice Nursing
- Health Equity
- Healthcare Systems
- Training
- Crisis Management
- Global Governance
- Postcolonialism
- Health Workforce
- Patient Satisfaction
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Primary Care
- Industrial Enterprises
- Entrepreneurship
- Teaching Methods
- Globalization
- Language Teaching
- Pedagogy
- Tourism Development
- Student Competencies
- Sustainability
- Economic Development
- Innovation Economics
- Epidemiology
- Education
- Migration
- Renewable Energy
- Irrigation
- Water Efficiency
- Biopolitics
- Social Sciences
- Meta-Analysis
- Collaborative Practice
- Community Health
- Nurse Practitioners
- Quality Improvement
- Nursing Education
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Pedagogy25▲ 18×4 topics
- Language Teaching23▲ 30×2 topics
- Tourism Development22▲ 57×2 topics
- Globalization22▲ 3.9×21 topics
- Student Competencies22▲ 117×1 topic
- Teaching Methods22▲ 47×1 topic
- Sustainability17▲ 2.5×8 topics
- Entrepreneurship17▲ 16×5 topics
- Economic Development16▲ 7.3×3 topics
- Industrial Enterprises16▲ 165×1 topic
- Innovation Economics16▲ 165×1 topic
- Primary Care16▲ 15×9 topics
- Epidemiology15▲ 1.34×55 topics
- Public Health14▲ 3.5×26 topics
- Education10▲ 2.0×23 topics
- Mental Health9▲ 2.2×19 topics
- Migration9▲ 9.4×7 topics
- Patient Satisfaction9▲ 9.9×7 topics
- Renewable Energy8▲ 2.1×6 topics
- Health Workforce7▲ 62×2 topics
- Irrigation7▲ 135×1 topic
- Postcolonialism7▲ 18×3 topics
- Water Efficiency7▲ 135×1 topic
- Global Governance7▲ 10×3 topics
- Biopolitics6▲ 29×1 topic
- Crisis Management6▲ 44×1 topic
- Social Sciences6▲ 16×5 topics
- Training6▲ 9.9×3 topics
- Meta-Analysis6▲ 3.5×13 topics
- Healthcare Systems6▲ 45×3 topics
- Collaborative Practice6▲ 49×2 topics
- Health Equity5▲ 6.6×3 topics
- Community Health5▲ 12×4 topics
- Advanced Practice Nursing5▲ 134×1 topic
- Nurse Practitioners5▲ 134×1 topic
- Health Policy5▲ 11×3 topics
- Quality Improvement5▲ 8.9×6 topics
- Advocacy4▲ 50×1 topic
- Nursing Education4▲ 10×4 topics
- Pediatrics4▲ 50×1 topic
Which research topics does Foundation for Human Potential publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Education, Innovation and Language Studies, Economic and Industrial Development, Engineering and Agricultural Innovations and Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Innovation and Language Studies Education 22 works
- 2 Economic and Industrial Development Economics and Econometrics 16 works
- 3 Engineering and Agricultural Innovations Aquatic Science 7 works
- 4 Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies Political Science and International Relations 6 works
- 5 Nursing Roles and Practices General Health Professions 5 works
- 6 Child and Adolescent Health General Health Professions 4 works
- 7 Social and Educational Sciences Education 3 works
- 8 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 2 works
- 9 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 2 works
- 10 linguistics and terminology studies Language and Linguistics 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Foundation for Human Potential's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 52% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Foundation for Human Potential as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00091% in 2024.
Fractional works of Foundation for Human Potential over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 22.8% in 2008.
Other research institutions in Chicago
- University of Chicago
- University of Illinois Chicago
- Loyola University Chicago
- Illinois Institute of Technology
- Rush University Medical Center
- DePaul University
- Experimental Station
- Boeing (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Foundation for Human Potential. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
