Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Cognitive Abilities and Testing is a research topic within Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Science Explorer counts 21k research works in it since 1950. 25.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the effects of working memory training on cognitive abilities, including intelligence, and its relationship with genetic influences, socioeconomic status, and brain plasticity. It also investigates the impact of video game training on cognitive control and the role of twin studies in understanding these phenomena.
- Working Memory
- Intelligence
- Training
- Cognitive Abilities
- Genetic Influences
- Video Games
- Meta-analysis
- Socioeconomic Status
- Twin Studies
- Brain Plasticity
- Research works
- 21k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.4k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 25.6% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +7% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Cognitive Abilities and Testing research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (891 and 281 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 891 works
- 2 China 281 works
- 3 Germany 215 works
- 4 United Kingdom 200 works
- 5 Canada 97 works
- 6 Italy 84 works
- 7 Spain 77 works
- 8 Netherlands 77 works
- 9 Japan 76 works
- 10 Australia 73 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Cognitive Abilities and Testing research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Cognitive Abilities and Testing research, followed by King's College London and University College London.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States 32 works
- 2 King's College London United Kingdom 19 works
- 3 University College London United Kingdom 18 works
- 4 University of Oslo Norway 14 works
- 5 Beijing Normal University China 14 works
- 6 University of Minnesota United States 13 works
- 7 Harvard University United States 13 works
- 8 Yale University United States 13 works
- 9 The University of Texas at Austin United States 12 works
- 10 Washington University in St. Louis United States 12 works
Who are the leading researchers in Cognitive Abilities and Testing?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Cognitive Abilities and Testing include Dan J. Stein, H.J. Eysenck and Luigi Ferrucci.
- 1 Dan J. Stein 7.7k citations
- 2 H.J. Eysenck 5.7k citations
- 3 Luigi Ferrucci 5.3k citations
- 4 George Davey Smith 4.9k citations
- 5 Herbert W. Marsh 4.6k citations
- 6 Robert J. Sternberg 4.4k citations
- 7 André G. Uitterlinden 4.4k citations
- 8 James G. Scott 4.3k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Cognitive Abilities and Testing research done?
The largest centres of Cognitive Abilities and Testing research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Beijing (China), New York (United States) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Oslo, Chapel Hill and Amsterdam.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- OsloNO · 32.8 works7.7×
- Chapel HillUS · 32.1 works6.1×
- AmsterdamNL · 27.1 works5.3×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Cognitive Abilities and Testing than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Cognitive Abilities and Testing?
Among universities, judged by research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, University of Oslo and King's College London score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands | 69.3 | 44.0% | 9.9× | 11 | +4.7% |
| 2 | University of Oslo Norway | 66.2 | 29.6% | 10.0× | 14 | +62.4% |
| 3 | King's College London United Kingdom | 59.3 | 26.2% | 8.8× | 19 | -5.1% |
| 4 | University of Zurich Switzerland | 50.4 | 38.0% | 5.3× | 8 | +62.9% |
| 5 | Karolinska Institutet Sweden | 50.2 | 20.5% | 8.5× | 11 | -1.4% |
| 6 | Cornell University United States | 45.4 | 32.4% | 3.2× | 9 | +288.5% |
| 7 | University of Bern Switzerland | 44.9 | 27.0% | 6.7× | 8 | +36.3% |
| 8 | Beijing Normal University China | 44.2 | 28.8% | 6.6× | 14 | -29.0% |
| 9 | University College London United Kingdom | 43.9 | 21.5% | 4.6× | 18 | +7.3% |
| 10 | University of Padua Italy | 43.3 | 39.8% | 4.0× | 10 | +9.0% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Cognitive Abilities and Testing research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Cognitive Abilities and Testing.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.