Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Sogndal · Norway

Idrettssenteret (Norway)

Research works
24
▲ 42% vs 2018-21
Citations
493
20.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
83%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Idrettssenteret (Norway) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Idrettssenteret (Norway) work in?

In all years, 48% of research at Idrettssenteret (Norway) is in Health Sciences, 41% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (39%), Social Sciences (20%), Psychology (13%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 12 fractional works · 48.4% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 38.8% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 7.9% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 2 fractional works · 7.5% of its workReproductive Medicine: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 9.6% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 10 fractional works · 40.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 19.9% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 7.9% of its workGender Studies: 2 fractional works · 6.2% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 13.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCatalysis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKIdrettssenteret(Norway)24fractional works, all years
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences48%Social Sciences41%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine938.8%
    2. Health Professions29.6%
    1. Social Sciences519.9%
    2. Psychology313.2%
    3. Arts and Humanities14.2%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance02.1%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting01.4%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology14.0%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology01.4%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.8%
    4. Neuroscience00.7%
    1. Computer Science01.7%
    2. Engineering01.7%
    3. Chemical Engineering00.4%
    4. Materials Science00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.33× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.24× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 1.44× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 5.59× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.40× its world share, 4 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.39× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 1.32× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.43× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions5.59×1 works
  2. Medicine2.40×4 works
  3. Chemical Engineering1.44×0 works
  4. Social Sciences1.43×2 works
  5. Arts and Humanities1.39×0 works
  6. Immunology and Microbiology1.33×0 works
  7. Psychology1.32×0 works
  8. Neuroscience1.24×0 works
  9. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.75×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.52×0 works
  11. Materials Science0.14×0 works
  12. Engineering0.03×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Idrettssenteret (Norway)?

The most cited paper from Idrettssenteret (Norway) is "How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury" (Torbjørn Soligard, Martin Peter Schwellnus, Juan Manuel Alonso et al., 2016), with 1,029 citations. Next come "How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness" (842) and "Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Leukocyte-Rich PRP or Leukocyte-Poor PRP Versus Saline" (170).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury Torbjørn Soligard, Martin Peter Schwellnus, Juan Manuel Alonso et al. · British Journal of Sports Medicine Open access 17 Aug 2016 1,029
2 How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness Martin Peter Schwellnus, Torbjørn Soligard, Juan Manuel Alonso et al. · British Journal of Sports Medicine Open access 17 Aug 2016 842
3 Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Leukocyte-Rich PRP or Leukocyte-Poor PRP Versus Saline Alex Scott, Robert F. LaPrade, Kimberly G. Harmon et al. · The American Journal of Sports Medicine 30 Apr 2019 170
4 Artificial intelligence in the fertility clinic: status, pitfalls and possibilities Michael Alexander Riegler, Mette Haug Stensen, Oliwia Witczak et al. · Human Reproduction Open access 23 Jun 2021 90
5 Para sport translation of the IOC consensus on recording and reporting of data for injury and illness in sport Wayne Elton Derman, Marelise Badenhorst, Cheri A Blauwet et al. · British Journal of Sports Medicine Open access 14 Apr 2021 75
All 41 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Idrettssenteret (Norway)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Qualitative Research, Gender, Identity, Fertility Preservation, Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation, Learning, Trauma and Fan Culture.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 22 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 22 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology2▲ 2.2×9 topics
  2. Qualitative Research2▲ 15×4 topics
  3. Gender2▲ 13×2 topics
  4. Identity2▲ 9.9×2 topics
  5. Fertility Preservation2▲ 100×1 topic
  6. Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation2▲ 100×1 topic
  7. Education2▲ 5.0×3 topics
  8. Learning2▲ 34×3 topics
  9. Trauma2▲ 35×2 topics
  10. Fan Culture2▲ 242×1 topic
  11. Sport2▲ 166×1 topic
  12. Risk Factors1▲ 5.4×2 topics
  13. High-Intensity Interval Training1▲ 52×2 topics
  14. Holocaust1▲ 201×2 topics
  15. Special Education1▲ 68×2 topics
  16. Collective Memory1▲ 195×1 topic
  17. Dark Tourism1▲ 436×1 topic
  18. Health Workforce1▲ 90×1 topic
  19. Methodology1▲ 81×1 topic
  20. Resistance Training1▲ 43×2 topics
  21. Rural Health1▲ 145×1 topic
  22. Social Sciences1▲ 25×1 topic

Which research topics does Idrettssenteret (Norway) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Reproductive Biology and Fertility, Global Health Workforce Issues, Urbanization and City Planning and Sperm and Testicular Function.

  1. 1 Reproductive Biology and Fertility Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
  2. 2 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 1 works
  3. 3 Urbanization and City Planning Urban Studies 0 works
  4. 4 Sperm and Testicular Function Reproductive Medicine 0 works
  5. 5 Metabolism and Genetic Disorders Clinical Biochemistry 0 works
  6. 6 Shoulder Injury and Treatment Surgery 0 works
  7. 7 Hormonal and reproductive studies Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 0 works
  8. 8 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 German History and Society History 0 works
  10. 10 Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available83.2%not open16.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.7%domestic only83.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Idrettssenteret (Norway)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 42% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting20052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Idrettssenteret (Norway) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000023% in 2024.

still counting0.000025%0.000050%0.000075%Idrettssenteret (Norway)0.000014% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Idrettssenteret (Norway) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Sogndal

All research institutions in Sogndal

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Idrettssenteret (Norway). Posts are plain text and can be reported.