Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Pruszków · Poland

Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa

In research, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa stands highest in Physical Sciences (#9,786 of 10,670 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Plant Science (Plant Science is 8.9× its share of world research).

ibles.pl/en/web/guest/homeROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#14,597
of 22,385 · #6,092 all time
Rank in Poland
#152
of 255
Research works
1.8k
▼ 29% vs 2018-21
Citations
7.6k
4.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.2%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.01×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
30%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%
Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa

What is Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Physical SciencesDomain #9,786 of 10,670 9.2%65 #4816

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa work in?

In 2022-now, 45% of research at Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa is in Physical Sciences, 41% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (36%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (33%), Social Sciences (8%). It does 2.8× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 71 fractional works · 45.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 56 fractional works · 35.9% of its workEcology: 15 fractional works · 9.7% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 15 fractional works · 9.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 9 fractional works · 5.5% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 6 fractional works · 3.9% of its workWater Science and Technology: 4 fractional works · 2.3% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 3 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEcological Modeling: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMechanics of Materials: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMechanical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 5 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAtmospheric Science: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGeology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 64 fractional works · 40.8% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 52 fractional works · 33.1% of its workPlant Science: 24 fractional works · 15.5% of its workInsect Science: 13 fractional works · 8.3% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 11 fractional works · 7.2% of its workSoil Science: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 12 fractional works · 7.5% of its workCell Biology: 5 fractional works · 3.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 19 fractional works · 12.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 13 fractional works · 8.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 4 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLinguistics and Language: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 3 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workClassics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKInstytut BadawczyLeśnictwa157fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences41%Physical Sciences45%Health Sciences2%Social Sciences12%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science5635.9%
    2. Engineering74.6%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences53.0%
    4. Materials Science10.4%
    5. Chemistry10.4%
    6. Computer Science00.3%
    7. Chemical Engineering00.3%
    8. Mathematics00.1%
    9. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences5233.1%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology127.5%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.1%
    1. Social Sciences138.2%
    2. Arts and Humanities31.7%
    3. Psychology21.4%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance21.1%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.1%
    1. Medicine21.5%
    2. Nursing00.1%
    3. Health Professions00.1%
    4. Veterinary00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Plant Science takes 8.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Plant ScienceSubfield · 24.3 works8.9×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 6.97× its world share, 52 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.40× its world share, 12 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 0.83× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.25× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.92× its world share, 5 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.31× its world share, 7 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 7.24× its world share, 56 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.08× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.58× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.50× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.44× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.65× its world share, 13 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 7.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Science7.24×56 works
  2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences6.97×52 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.92×5 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.40×12 works
  5. Chemical Engineering0.83×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.65×13 works
  7. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.60×0 works
  8. Arts and Humanities0.58×3 works
  9. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.50×2 works
  10. Psychology0.44×2 works
  11. Engineering0.31×7 works
  12. Chemistry0.25×1 works
  13. Nursing0.25×0 works
  14. Materials Science0.12×1 works
  15. Veterinary0.09×0 works
  16. Medicine0.08×2 works
  17. Mathematics0.06×0 works
  18. Immunology and Microbiology0.05×0 works
  19. Computer Science0.04×0 works
  20. Physics and Astronomy0.02×0 works
  21. Health Professions0.02×0 works
  22. Business, Management and Accounting0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa?

Ranked on the quality score, Krzysztof Stereńczak, Radomir Bałazy and Marcin Klisz lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa.

  1. 1 Krzysztof Stereńczak Poland · #165,281 worldwide 5.7k citations · 183 works
  2. 2 Radomir Bałazy Poland · #386,379 worldwide 3.4k citations · 52 works
  3. 3 Marcin Klisz Poland · #546,114 worldwide 2.5k citations · 133 works
  4. 4 Mariusz Ciesielski Poland · #1,144,931 worldwide 704 citations · 52 works
  5. 5 Miłosz Mielcarek Poland · #1,276,406 worldwide 543 citations · 32 works
  6. 6 Aneta Modzelewska Poland · #1,327,330 worldwide 2.1k citations · 16 works
  7. 7 Agnieszka Kamińska Poland · #1,632,554 worldwide 712 citations · 64 works
  8. 8 Paweł Lech Poland · #1,670,266 worldwide 724 citations · 24 works
  9. 9 M. Dudzinska Poland · #1,834,481 worldwide 443 citations · 23 works
  10. 10 Łukasz Kuberski Poland · #1,865,857 worldwide 268 citations · 28 works
All ranked researchers at Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa

What are the most cited papers from Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa?

The most cited paper from Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa is "Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data" (Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Hooman Latifi, Krzysztof Stereńczak et al., 2016), with 1,076 citations. Next come "Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods" (855) and "Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe" (600).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data Fabian Ewald Fassnacht, Hooman Latifi, Krzysztof Stereńczak et al. · Remote Sensing of Environment 20 Aug 2016 1,076
2 Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods Houda Ben Slama, Ali Chenari Bouket, Zeinab Pourhassan et al. · Applied Sciences Open access 6 Jul 2021 855
3 Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe Alberto Oppermann Santini et al. · New Phytologist Open access 11 Oct 2012 600
4 Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe Francesca Pilotto et al. · Nature Communications ReviewOpen access 13 Jul 2020 471
5 Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential Lidong Mo et al. · Nature Open access232 authors 13 Nov 2023 453
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Invasive Species, Biodiversity Conservation, Biodiversity, Biomass Estimation, Conservation, Ecosystem Functioning and Phylogenetic Analysis.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change37▲ 8.7×38 topics
  2. Invasive Species21▲ 32×13 topics
  3. Biodiversity Conservation20▲ 34×11 topics
  4. Biodiversity16▲ 14×13 topics
  5. Biomass Estimation13▲ 53×3 topics
  6. Conservation13▲ 19×10 topics
  7. Ecosystem Functioning12▲ 37×4 topics
  8. Phylogenetic Analysis12▲ 24×8 topics
  9. Aboveground Biomass12▲ 87×2 topics
  10. Ecology10▲ 38×2 topics
  11. Vegetation10▲ 59×3 topics
  12. Global Warming9▲ 14×5 topics
  13. Biological Invasions9▲ 61×2 topics
  14. Remote Sensing9▲ 4.6×9 topics
  15. Forest Management9▲ 91×2 topics
  16. Taxonomy9▲ 38×10 topics
  17. DNA Barcoding8▲ 30×6 topics
  18. Flora8▲ 205×1 topic
  19. Vascular Plants8▲ 205×1 topic
  20. Dead Wood8▲ 283×1 topic
  21. Saproxylic Beetles8▲ 283×1 topic
  22. Ecosystem Resilience7▲ 30×4 topics
  23. Fungal Pathogens7▲ 35×3 topics
  24. Bark Beetles7▲ 231×1 topic
  25. Biogeography7▲ 16×8 topics
  26. Ecosystem Services7▲ 12×7 topics
  27. Forest Pests7▲ 231×1 topic
  28. Tropical Forests7▲ 129×2 topics
  29. Host Specificity7▲ 38×3 topics
  30. Allometric Models6▲ 85×1 topic
  31. Carbon Stocks6▲ 156×1 topic
  32. Terrestrial Laser Scanning6▲ 34×2 topics
  33. Phylogeny6▲ 22×8 topics
  34. Population Dynamics6▲ 14×7 topics
  35. Forest Carbon Stocks5▲ 57×1 topic
  36. Lidar Remote Sensing5▲ 57×1 topic
  37. Soil Properties5▲ 20×3 topics
  38. Endophytic Fungi5▲ 36×2 topics
  39. Evolution5▲ 12×5 topics
  40. Genomic Characterization5▲ 25×1 topic

Which research topics does Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Forest Insect Ecology and Management and Forest ecology and management.

Botany and Plant Ecology…8Botany and Plant Ecology Studies: 8 fractional worksForest Ecology and Biodi…8Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies: 8 fractional worksForest Insect Ecology an…7Forest Insect Ecology and Management: 7 fractional worksForest ecology and manag…6Forest ecology and management: 6 fractional worksRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications: 5 fractional worksPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases: 5 fractional worksFire effects on ecosystems5Fire effects on ecosystems: 5 fractional worksForest Management and Policy: 4 fractional worksMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions: 3 fractional worksColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution: 3 fractional works
Plant ScienceInsect ScienceEcologyNature and Landscape Conservation4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Botany and Plant Ecology Studies Plant Science 8 works
  2. 2 Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies Insect Science 8 works
  3. 3 Forest Insect Ecology and Management Ecology 7 works
  4. 4 Forest ecology and management Nature and Landscape Conservation 6 works
  5. 5 Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications Environmental Engineering 5 works
  6. 6 Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases Cell Biology 5 works
  7. 7 Fire effects on ecosystems Global and Planetary Change 5 works
  8. 8 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 4 works
  9. 9 Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions Plant Science 3 works
  10. 10 Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.2%not open69.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.1%domestic only90.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 29% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00057% in 2024.

still counting0.0020%0.0040%0.0060%Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa0.00054% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2025Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa7.0% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 11.3% in 2022.

Other research institutions in Pruszków

All research institutions in Pruszków

Share Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa's ranking

Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa on Science Explorer

A card with Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.