Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Iowa City · United States

Iowa Policy Project

World rank, all time
#12,541
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#2,596
of 7,310
Research works
305
▼ 11% vs 2018-21
Citations
14k
46.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.15×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
22%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%

Which fields of science does Iowa Policy Project work in?

In 2022-now, 48% of research at Iowa Policy Project is in Health Sciences, 36% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (21%), Social Sciences (19%), Health Professions (18%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 12 fractional works · 48.5% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 20.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 18.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 16.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 2 fractional works · 8.2% of its workPeriodontics: 1 fractional works · 5.6% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 35.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 18.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 6.3% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 6.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 6.3% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 9.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.6% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKIowa PolicyProject25fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences9%Health Sciences48%Social Sciences36%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine520.9%
    2. Health Professions418.0%
    3. Dentistry28.2%
    4. Nursing01.4%
    1. Social Sciences518.5%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance26.8%
    3. Psychology15.9%
    4. Arts and Humanities14.1%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    1. Environmental Science13.0%
    2. Computer Science12.4%
    3. Mathematics12.2%
    4. Engineering01.1%
    5. Materials Science00.7%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences14.6%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.6%
    3. Neuroscience00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.98× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.30× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.60× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.82× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 16.85× its world share, 2 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 6.83× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.09× its world share, 5 worksMedicineNursing: 2.86× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.41× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 3.17× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.94× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.47× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 16.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry16.85×2 works
  2. Health Professions6.83×4 works
  3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.17×2 works
  4. Nursing2.86×0 works
  5. Psychology1.94×2 works
  6. Mathematics1.82×0 works
  7. Social Sciences1.47×5 works
  8. Arts and Humanities1.41×1 works
  9. Medicine1.09×5 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.98×1 works
  11. Environmental Science0.60×1 works
  12. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.30×0 works
  13. Computer Science0.30×1 works
  14. Neuroscience0.21×0 works
  15. Materials Science0.19×0 works
  16. Business, Management and Accounting0.09×0 works
  17. Engineering0.08×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Iowa Policy Project?

Ranked on the quality score, Karl Korsch, Paul Vincent Craven and Dan Campion lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Iowa Policy Project.

  1. 1 Karl Korsch United States · #2,141,553 worldwide 468 citations · 91 works
  2. 2 Paul Vincent Craven United States · #3,117,456 worldwide 36 citations · 29 works
  3. 3 Dan Campion United States · #4,301,763 worldwide 14 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Iowa Policy Project

What are the most cited papers from Iowa Policy Project?

The most cited paper from Iowa Policy Project is "Heart and Mind in Conflict: the Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making" (Baba Shiv, Alexander Fedorikhin, 1999), with 2,063 citations. Next come "Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies." (888) and "Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups" (866).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Heart and Mind in Conflict: the Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making Baba Shiv, Alexander Fedorikhin · Journal of Consumer Research Dec 1999 2,063
2 Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. James K. Harter, Frank L. Schmidt, Corey L. M. Keyes · American Psychological Association eBooks Book chapter 2003 888
3 Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups Poppy Lauretta McLeod, Sharon Alisa Lobel, Taylor Cox · Small Group Research Open access May 1996 866
4 Mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation Fayyaz Shiraz Sutterwala, Stefanie Haasken, Suzanne L. Cassel · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Open access 19 May 2014 750
5 Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Johnmarshall Reeve, Elizabeth Bolt, Yi Cai · Journal of Educational Psychology Sep 1999 749
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Iowa Policy Project?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Risk Factors, Social Determinants, Primary Care, Public Health, Chronic Disease, Health Outcomes and Global Burden.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 18 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 18 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health3▲ 8.6×12 topics
  2. Risk Factors2▲ 8.4×11 topics
  3. Epidemiology2▲ 2.3×14 topics
  4. Social Determinants2▲ 42×2 topics
  5. Public Health2▲ 5.3×10 topics
  6. Primary Care2▲ 18×5 topics
  7. Chronic Disease1▲ 34×3 topics
  8. Global Burden1▲ 10×4 topics
  9. Health Outcomes1▲ 21×4 topics
  10. Quality of Life1▲ 3.9×5 topics
  11. Dental Caries1▲ 53×2 topics
  12. Food Insecurity1▲ 83×1 topic
  13. Nutritional Consequences1▲ 100×1 topic
  14. Health Care Utilization1▲ 43×3 topics
  15. Prevention1▲ 11×3 topics
  16. Social Support1▲ 8.2×5 topics
  17. Cultural History1▲ 34×1 topic
  18. Walter Benjamin1▲ 1281×1 topic

Which research topics does Iowa Policy Project publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation, Dental Health and Care Utilization and Healthcare Policy and Management.

  1. 1 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 1 works
  2. 2 Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation Philosophy 1 works
  3. 3 Dental Health and Care Utilization Periodontics 1 works
  4. 4 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  5. 5 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 1 works
  6. 6 Oral microbiology and periodontitis research Periodontics 0 works
  7. 7 Insect and Pesticide Research Insect Science 0 works
  8. 8 Intimate Partner and Family Violence Health 0 works
  9. 9 Homelessness and Social Issues General Health Professions 0 works
  10. 10 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available22.3%not open77.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.8%domestic only91.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Iowa Policy Project's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 11% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Iowa Policy Project as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000079% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Iowa Policy Project0.000050% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Iowa Policy Project over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Iowa City

All research institutions in Iowa City

Share Iowa Policy Project's ranking

Iowa Policy Project on Science Explorer

A card with Iowa Policy Project's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Iowa Policy Project. Posts are plain text and can be reported.