- World rank, all time
- #28,800 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #6,063 of 7,310
- Research works
- 178 ▼ 78% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 5.9k 33.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.0% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.03× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 26% world 40%
- International
- 18% world 18%
Which fields of science does ACT work in?
In all years, 52% of research at ACT is in Social Sciences, 40% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (22%), Psychology (18%), Social Sciences (17%). It does 2.4× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences9352.2%
- Psychology3318.4%
- Social Sciences3017.0%
- Decision Sciences2111.6%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance52.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting31.7%
- Arts and Humanities10.7%
- Physical Sciences7140.1%
- Computer Science3922.1%
- Mathematics2413.5%
- Environmental Science42.2%
- Engineering31.6%
- Physics and Astronomy10.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
- Chemistry00.1%
- Materials Science00.1%
- Health Sciences84.4%
- Medicine73.8%
- Health Professions10.6%
- Life Sciences63.3%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 10.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 12 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences10.25×1 works
- Psychology9.13×4 works
- Mathematics5.44×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.84×1 works
- Computer Science2.59×3 works
- Neuroscience1.50×0 works
- Social Sciences1.23×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.21×0 works
- Environmental Science0.49×0 works
- Medicine0.34×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.19×0 works
- Engineering0.05×0 works
Who are the top researchers at ACT?
Ranked on the quality score, Dana M. Murano, Alex Casillas and Jason D. Way lead among researchers whose main affiliation is ACT.
- 1
Dana M. Murano
United States · #390,768 worldwide 626 citations · 27 works
- 2
Alex Casillas
United States · #703,207 worldwide 2.5k citations · 69 works
- 3
Jason D. Way
United States · #1,719,373 worldwide 613 citations · 39 works
- 4
Kristin Stoeffler
United States · #1,849,195 worldwide 206 citations · 17 works
- 5
Benjamin Deonovic
United States · #2,340,987 worldwide 408 citations · 25 works
- 6
Becky L. Bobek
United States · #2,827,966 worldwide 400 citations · 17 works
- 7
Judith A. Spray
United States · #3,043,683 worldwide 1.2k citations · 73 works
- 8
John C. Kalohn
United States · #3,406,501 worldwide 351 citations · 21 works
- 9
Raeal Moore
United States · #5,009,855 worldwide 174 citations · 48 works
Which keywords describe research at ACT?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Structural Equation Modeling, Student Engagement, Factor Analysis, Measurement Invariance, Educational Inequality, Academic Achievement, Academic Performance and Motivation.
- Lasso
- Variable Selection
- Principal Component Analysis
- Learning Analytics
- Learning Outcomes
- Personality Traits
- Student Achievement
- Gender Differences
- Online Learning
- College Retention
- Socioeconomic Status
- Social Support
- Affective States
- Educational Technology
- Bayesian Methods
- Motivation
- Academic Performance
- Academic Achievement
- Measurement Invariance
- Student Engagement
- Structural Equation Modeling
- Factor Analysis
- Educational Inequality
- Machine Learning
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems
- Self-Regulation
- Diversity
- Bayesian Networks
- Cognitive-Affective Interaction
- Collaborative Learning
- Meta-Analysis
- First-Generation Students
- Statistical Methods
- STEM Education
- Model Selection
- Regression Analysis
- Sensitivity Analysis
- Metacognition
- Survival Analysis
- Career Development
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Structural Equation Modeling17▲ 69×4 topics
- Student Engagement17▲ 36×8 topics
- Factor Analysis12▲ 593×1 topic
- Measurement Invariance12▲ 593×1 topic
- Educational Inequality10▲ 90×2 topics
- Academic Achievement9▲ 36×6 topics
- Machine Learning9▲ 2.3×18 topics
- Academic Performance8▲ 66×3 topics
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems8▲ 85×2 topics
- Motivation8▲ 15×4 topics
- Self-Regulation7▲ 25×4 topics
- Bayesian Methods7▲ 66×2 topics
- Diversity7▲ 21×2 topics
- Educational Technology7▲ 5.7×8 topics
- Bayesian Networks7▲ 43×3 topics
- Affective States6▲ 186×1 topic
- Cognitive-Affective Interaction6▲ 186×1 topic
- Social Support6▲ 7.7×4 topics
- Collaborative Learning6▲ 51×2 topics
- Socioeconomic Status6▲ 47×2 topics
- Meta-Analysis6▲ 6.2×6 topics
- College Retention6▲ 156×1 topic
- First-Generation Students6▲ 156×1 topic
- Online Learning6▲ 7.0×6 topics
- Statistical Methods6▲ 72×3 topics
- Gender Differences6▲ 9.8×3 topics
- STEM Education5▲ 11×5 topics
- Student Achievement5▲ 34×3 topics
- Model Selection5▲ 24×3 topics
- Personality Traits5▲ 23×5 topics
- Regression Analysis5▲ 49×3 topics
- Learning Outcomes5▲ 12×6 topics
- Sensitivity Analysis5▲ 22×3 topics
- Learning Analytics5▲ 39×2 topics
- Metacognition5▲ 22×3 topics
- Principal Component Analysis5▲ 18×2 topics
- Survival Analysis5▲ 9.7×2 topics
- Variable Selection5▲ 28×2 topics
- Career Development5▲ 29×4 topics
- Lasso5▲ 74×1 topic
Which research topics does ACT publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Emotional Intelligence and Performance, Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, Personality Traits and Psychology and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Emotional Intelligence and Performance Social Psychology 1 works
- 2 Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 3 Personality Traits and Psychology Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 4 Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1 works
- 5 Early Childhood Education and Development Education 0 works
- 6 Medical Education and Admissions Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 7 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 0 works
- 8 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 0 works
- 9 Social and Intergroup Psychology Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 10 Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has ACT's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 78% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is ACT as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000067% in 2024.
Fractional works of ACT over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Iowa City
- University of Iowa
- Iowa City Public Library
- Iowa Policy Project
- ACT Foundation
- American College Testing
- Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
- Digital Artefacts (United States)
- Behavioral Diagnostics (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about ACT. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
