King's Fund
In research, King's Fund stands highest in Health Sciences (#2,072 of 20,462 worldwide), Health Professions (#568 of 3,776 worldwide) and General Health Professions (#469 of 2,051 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #10,066 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #560 of 2,253
- Research works
- 1k ▼ 65% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 14k 14.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 20.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 18% world 28%
What is King's Fund known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #2,072 of 20,462 | 23.3% | 597 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #568 of 3,776 | 23.8% | 481 | |
| General Health ProfessionsSubfield | #469 of 2,051 | 24.3% | 376 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,544 of 16,945 | 22.6% | 373 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,385 of 10,206 | 21.5% | 140 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where King's Fund sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 14.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 14.3×
- Dentistry 4.8×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.8×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Nursing 0.8×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at King's Fund?
Ranked on the composite score, John Appleby, Ken Judge and Nick Timmins lead among researchers whose main affiliation is King's Fund.
- 1 John Appleby United Kingdom · #333,609 worldwide 80 citations · 40 works
- 2 Ken Judge United Kingdom · #639,968 worldwide 29 citations · 34 works
- 3 Nick Timmins United Kingdom · #679,235 worldwide 2 citations · 30 works
- 4 Julia Neuberger United Kingdom · #987,787 worldwide 1 citations · 30 works
- 5 Melanie Henwood United Kingdom · #1,009,589 worldwide 4 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at King's Fund?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Primary Care, Public Health, Depression, Healthcare Workers, Well-being, Quality Improvement, Mental Health and COVID-19.
- Professionalism
- Global
- Psychological Resilience
- Health Outcomes
- Job Satisfaction
- Physician Burnout
- NHS
- Quality Improvement
- Healthcare Workers
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Primary Care
- Depression
- COVID-19
- Well-being
- Quality of Life
- doctors' strikes
- Chronic Disease Management
- Anxiety
- Leadership
- Epidemiology
- Health Promotion
- Talent Management
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 23 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 23 words, with their numbers
- Primary Care4▲ 46×5 topics
- Public Health3▲ 10×8 topics
- Depression2▲ 11×5 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 6.3×8 topics
- COVID-192▲ 6.6×4 topics
- Healthcare Workers2▲ 37×3 topics
- Well-being2▲ 23×4 topics
- Quality Improvement2▲ 45×5 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 6.0×6 topics
- NHS1▲ 473×1 topic
- doctors' strikes1▲ 589×1 topic
- Physician Burnout1▲ 80×2 topics
- Chronic Disease Management1▲ 29×2 topics
- Job Satisfaction1▲ 13×3 topics
- Anxiety1▲ 10×2 topics
- Health Outcomes1▲ 18×2 topics
- Leadership1▲ 11×3 topics
- Psychological Resilience1▲ 56×2 topics
- Epidemiology1▲ 1.20×5 topics
- Global1▲ 136×1 topic
- Health Promotion1▲ 15×3 topics
- Professionalism1▲ 29×2 topics
- Talent Management1▲ 120×1 topic
Which research topics does King's Fund publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Healthcare Systems and Challenges, Human Resource and Talent Management, Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Healthcare Systems and Challenges General Health Professions 1 works
- 2 Human Resource and Talent Management Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works
- 3 Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout General Health Professions 1 works
- 4 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 1 works
- 5 Health, psychology, and well-being General Health Professions 1 works
- 6 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 1 works
- 7 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 8 Psychiatric care and mental health services Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 9 Healthcare cost, quality, practices General Health Professions 0 works
- 10 Disaster Response and Management Emergency Medical Services 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has King's Fund's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 65% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.