Lindenwood University
In research, Lindenwood University stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,413 of 9,585 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,617 of 5,988 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #6,686 of 22,385 · #8,774 all time
- Rank in United States
- #888 of 3,332
- Research works
- 870 ▲ 49% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 14k 16.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 14.8% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.06× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 41% world 40%
- International
- 5% world 18%
What is Lindenwood University known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,413 of 9,585 | 12.5% | 149 | #6976 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,617 of 5,988 | 11.4% | 65 | #4697 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Lindenwood University sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Lindenwood University work in?
In 2022-now, 55% of research at Lindenwood University is in Social Sciences, 20% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (24%), Computer Science (15%), Arts and Humanities (15%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences16354.6%
- Social Sciences7123.7%
- Arts and Humanities4414.6%
- Psychology299.6%
- Business, Management and Accounting103.3%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance82.8%
- Decision Sciences20.6%
- Physical Sciences6020.0%
- Computer Science4615.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences51.6%
- Engineering41.4%
- Environmental Science20.8%
- Mathematics20.6%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Chemistry00.1%
- Health Sciences4715.6%
- Medicine4013.3%
- Health Professions62.1%
- Nursing10.2%
- Life Sciences299.8%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 5.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 21 fields, with their numbers
- Arts and Humanities5.04×44 works
- Psychology3.17×29 works
- Neuroscience3.10×15 works
- Computer Science1.99×46 works
- Social Sciences1.88×71 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.30×8 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.02×10 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.01×5 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.85×1 works
- Health Professions0.78×6 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.71×11 works
- Medicine0.69×40 works
- Decision Sciences0.63×2 works
- Nursing0.50×1 works
- Mathematics0.48×2 works
- Environmental Science0.16×2 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.14×2 works
- Engineering0.09×4 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.04×0 works
- Chemistry0.04×0 works
- Arts and Humanities 5.0×
- Psychology 3.2×
- Neuroscience 3.1×
- Computer Science 2.0×
- Social Sciences 1.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.7×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.0×
- Chemistry 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Lindenwood University?
Ranked on the quality score, James Hutson, Jeremiah Ratican and Meredith Marsh lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Lindenwood University.
- 1
James Hutson
United States · #595,663 worldwide 2.6k citations · 330 works
- 2
Jeremiah Ratican
United States · #1,294,069 worldwide 197 citations · 16 works
- 3
Meredith Marsh
United States · #1,481,825 worldwide 358 citations · 17 works
- 4
Daniel Plate
United States · #1,497,279 worldwide 212 citations · 28 works
- 5
Patrick J. O’Banion
United States · #1,544,843 worldwide 117 citations · 27 works
- 6
Chad M. Kerksick
United States · #1,676,964 worldwide 11k citations · 327 works
- 7
Theodore W. Cohen
United States · #2,346,229 worldwide 146 citations · 27 works
- 8
Raymond Scupin
United States · #2,353,679 worldwide 931 citations · 47 works
- 9
Jason Lively
United States · #2,465,589 worldwide 100 citations · 15 works
- 10
Jonathan Mike
United States · #2,535,772 worldwide 250 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Lindenwood University?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, Social Interaction, Learning Outcomes, Big Data, Embodiment, Machine Learning and Resistance Training.
- Ethical Challenges
- Ukraine
- Algorithmic Bias
- Russia
- Conflict
- Protein
- Amino Acids
- Cultural Sustainability
- Colonialism
- History
- Metabolism
- Exercise
- Identity
- Security
- Immersion
- Resistance Training
- Embodiment
- Education
- Virtual Reality
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Big Data
- Social Interaction
- Learning Outcomes
- Globalization
- Cultural Heritage
- Presence
- Aging
- Religion
- Ethics
- Student Engagement
- Literature
- Nationalism
- Nutrition
- International Relations
- Geopolitics
- Discrimination
- High-Intensity Interval Training
- Fairness
- Clinical Decision Support
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning21▲ 2.1×17 topics
- Artificial Intelligence21▲ 4.8×14 topics
- Big Data14▲ 5.1×8 topics
- Virtual Reality14▲ 9.6×6 topics
- Social Interaction13▲ 11×4 topics
- Education12▲ 2.4×16 topics
- Learning Outcomes12▲ 9.9×2 topics
- Embodiment11▲ 20×3 topics
- Globalization11▲ 1.92×21 topics
- Resistance Training11▲ 39×2 topics
- Cultural Heritage10▲ 6.3×11 topics
- Immersion10▲ 49×1 topic
- Presence10▲ 49×1 topic
- Security9▲ 4.4×7 topics
- Aging8▲ 5.2×7 topics
- Identity8▲ 3.8×13 topics
- Religion8▲ 6.0×9 topics
- Exercise8▲ 23×3 topics
- Ethics8▲ 5.3×7 topics
- Metabolism8▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Student Engagement8▲ 6.6×6 topics
- History8▲ 3.7×12 topics
- Literature8▲ 4.7×13 topics
- Colonialism7▲ 5.1×8 topics
- Nationalism7▲ 5.4×8 topics
- Cultural Sustainability7▲ 40×2 topics
- Nutrition7▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Amino Acids6▲ 23×1 topic
- International Relations6▲ 8.8×5 topics
- Protein6▲ 18×1 topic
- Geopolitics6▲ 14×4 topics
- Conflict6▲ 13×4 topics
- Discrimination6▲ 9.8×2 topics
- Russia6▲ 48×3 topics
- High-Intensity Interval Training6▲ 18×2 topics
- Algorithmic Bias6▲ 22×1 topic
- Fairness6▲ 18×1 topic
- Ukraine6▲ 55×2 topics
- Clinical Decision Support6▲ 12×1 topic
- Ethical Challenges6▲ 8.5×1 topic
Which research topics does Lindenwood University publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Muscle metabolism and nutrition, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts Human-Computer Interaction 10 works
- 2 Muscle metabolism and nutrition Cell Biology 6 works
- 3 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 6 works
- 4 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 6 works
- 5 Museums and Cultural Heritage Museology 5 works
- 6 European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 7 Aesthetic Perception and Analysis Cognitive Neuroscience 4 works
- 8 Sports Performance and Training Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 4 works
- 9 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage Geology 3 works
- 10 Online Learning and Analytics Computer Science Applications 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Lindenwood University's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 49% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Lindenwood University as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0015% in 2024.
Fractional works of Lindenwood University over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 20.3% in 2023.
Other research institutions in Saint Charles
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Lindenwood University. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
