Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Oslo · Norway

Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten

In research, Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten stands highest in Health Sciences (#3,786 of 16,688 worldwide), Medicine (#4,688 of 14,558 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#11,864 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#11,700
of 34,923
Rank in Norway
#93
of 215
Research works
416
▲ 4% vs 2018-21
Citations
31k
75.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.2%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.25×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
62%
world 40%
International
28%
world 18%
Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten

What is Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #3,786 of 16,688 20.1%261
MedicineField #4,688 of 14,558 20.4%156
Social SciencesDomain #11,864 of 14,833 17.8%123

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten work in?

In 2022-now, 48% of research at Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten is in Health Sciences, 43% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (22%), Health Professions (21%), Psychology (17%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 13 fractional works · 47.8% of its workMedicine: 6 fractional works · 21.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 21.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 13.8% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 4.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPeriodontics: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 42.9% of its workPsychology: 5 fractional works · 17.3% of its workClinical Psychology: 3 fractional works · 10.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 13.0% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workALL ITS WORKNasjonaltKunnskapssenter…27fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences7%Health Sciences48%Social Sciences43%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine621.7%
    2. Health Professions621.3%
    3. Dentistry14.1%
    4. Nursing00.7%
    1. Psychology517.3%
    2. Social Sciences313.0%
    3. Arts and Humanities14.7%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.7%
    5. Decision Sciences12.1%
    6. Business, Management and Accounting12.0%
    1. Environmental Science12.8%
    2. Computer Science01.7%
    3. Mathematics01.4%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.6%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.3%
    6. Materials Science00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.5%
    2. Neuroscience00.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.28× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Environmental Science: 0.56× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 8.51× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 8.08× its world share, 6 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.13× its world share, 6 worksMedicineNursing: 1.55× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.63× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.62× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.18× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.74× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 5.69× its world share, 5 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.03× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 8.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry8.51×1 works
  2. Health Professions8.08×6 works
  3. Psychology5.69×5 works
  4. Decision Sciences2.18×1 works
  5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.74×1 works
  6. Arts and Humanities1.63×1 works
  7. Nursing1.55×0 works
  8. Mathematics1.16×0 works
  9. Medicine1.13×6 works
  10. Social Sciences1.03×4 works
  11. Business, Management and Accounting0.62×0 works
  12. Environmental Science0.56×1 works
  13. Neuroscience0.45×0 works
  14. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.40×0 works
  15. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.28×0 works
  16. Computer Science0.22×0 works
  17. Physics and Astronomy0.14×0 works
  18. Materials Science0.07×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten?

Ranked on the quality score, Andrew David Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist and Gro Jamtvedt lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten.

  1. 1 Andrew David Oxman Norway · #7,004 worldwide 168k citations · 456 works
  2. 2 Gunn Elisabeth Vist Norway · #74,451 worldwide 90k citations · 233 works
  3. 3 Gro Jamtvedt Norway · #170,797 worldwide 15k citations · 117 works
  4. 4 Andrew Garratt Norway · #260,350 worldwide 11k citations · 205 works
  5. 5 Jan Odgaard‐Jensen Norway · #329,875 worldwide 13k citations · 62 works
  6. 6 Rigmor C. Berg Norway · #383,959 worldwide 2.2k citations · 51 works
  7. 7 Elizabeth Paulsen Norway · #717,368 worldwide 1.3k citations · 39 works
  8. 8 Michael de Vibe Norway · #850,310 worldwide 1.6k citations · 38 works
  9. 9 Marit Johansen Norway · #881,435 worldwide 8.7k citations · 57 works
  10. 10 Inger B. Scheel Norway · #889,321 worldwide 3.3k citations · 33 works
All ranked researchers at Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten

What are the most cited papers from Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten?

The most cited paper from Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten is "The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials" (Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug G. Altman, Peter Christian Gøtzsche et al., 2011), with 34,881 citations. Next come "GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations" (23,388) and "GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables" (10,853).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug G. Altman, Peter Christian Gøtzsche et al. · BMJ Open access 18 Oct 2011 34,881
2 GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations Gordon Henry Guyatt, Andrew David Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. · BMJ Open access 24 Apr 2008 23,388
3 GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables Gordon Henry Guyatt, Andrew David Oxman, Elie A. Akl et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 4 Jan 2011 10,853
4 GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence Howard Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger Jens Schünemann et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 6 Jan 2011 8,430
5 Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes Noah Michael Ivers, Gro Jamtvedt, Signe Agnes Flottorp et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Open access 8 Jun 2012 5,554
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Quality of Life, Mental Health, Healthcare Workers, Depression, Infectious Diseases, Human Rights and Adolescents.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 18 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 18 words, with their numbers
  1. Public Health3▲ 7.0×9 topics
  2. Quality of Life2▲ 6.5×9 topics
  3. Mental Health2▲ 6.3×8 topics
  4. Epidemiology2▲ 2.2×12 topics
  5. Depression2▲ 6.6×4 topics
  6. Healthcare Workers2▲ 26×3 topics
  7. Human Rights2▲ 5.5×3 topics
  8. Infectious Diseases1▲ 15×2 topics
  9. Qualitative Research1▲ 5.8×2 topics
  10. Adolescents1▲ 13×4 topics
  11. Developmental Trajectories1▲ 38×2 topics
  12. Ethical Considerations1▲ 13×2 topics
  13. Children1▲ 17×2 topics
  14. Disaster Response1▲ 57×1 topic
  15. Emotion Regulation1▲ 12×3 topics
  16. Evidence-Based Practice1▲ 31×3 topics
  17. Triage1▲ 104×1 topic
  18. Embodiment1▲ 20×2 topics

Which research topics does Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Disaster Response and Management, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Health Policy Implementation Science and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life.

  1. 1 Disaster Response and Management Emergency Medical Services 1 works
  2. 2 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 1 works
  4. 4 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  5. 5 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Dental Health and Care Utilization Periodontics 1 works
  7. 7 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 1 works
  8. 8 Frailty in Older Adults Geriatrics and Gerontology 0 works
  9. 9 Community Health and Development General Health Professions 0 works
  10. 10 Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available61.5%not open38.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.7%domestic only72.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 4% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000091% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten0.000081% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

20%40%Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten20.2% in 2015all institutions10.0% in 20152010

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 31.2% in 2012.

Other research institutions in Oslo

All research institutions in Oslo

Share Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten's ranking

Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten on Science Explorer

A card with Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.