Orthopädische Praxis
In research, Orthopädische Praxis stands highest in Medicine (#6,720 of 10,443 worldwide), Health Sciences (#7,884 of 11,982 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#7,246 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology — Social Psychology is 6.5× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #16,270 of 28,054 · #15,882 all time
- Rank in Germany
- #637 of 1,178
- Research works
- 2.1k ▲ 33% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 13k 6.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 15% world 28%
What is Orthopädische Praxis known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedicineField | #6,720 of 10,443 | 6.2% | 202 | #4504 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #7,884 of 11,982 | 6.0% | 244 | #5721 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,246 of 10,521 | 4.5% | 147 | #10248 | |
| PsychologyField | #2,115 of 2,181 | 3.0% | 61 | #3173 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Orthopädische Praxis sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Medicine#4,504 #6,720
- Health Sciences#5,721 #7,884
- Social Sciences#10,248 #7,246
- Psychology#3,173 #2,115
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Orthopädische Praxis specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Psychology takes 6.5× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Social PsychologySubfield · 24.5 works6.5×
- Clinical PsychologySubfield · 28.0 works6.2×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.6×
- Health Professions 3.2×
- Medicine 2.4×
- Arts and Humanities 2.4×
- Dentistry 2.1×
- Veterinary 1.5×
- Neuroscience 1.3×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Nursing 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Decision Sciences 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.0×
- Computer Science 0.0×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Orthopädische Praxis?
Ranked on the composite score, Rudolf Schlag, V. Pfaffenrath and Wiltrud Föcking lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Orthopädische Praxis.
- 1 Rudolf Schlag Germany · #188,165 worldwide 117 citations · 29 works
- 2 V. Pfaffenrath Germany · #476,374 worldwide 46 citations · 18 works
- 3 Wiltrud Föcking Germany · #650,073 worldwide 1 citations · 25 works
- 3 Marco Parrino Germany · #650,073 worldwide 1 citations · 25 works
- 5 R. G. Holzheimer Germany · #700,612 worldwide 33 citations · 19 works
- 6 Michael Strobel Germany · #783,888 worldwide 32 citations · 50 works
- 7 Hartmut Gaulrapp Germany · #854,004 worldwide 10 citations · 66 works
- 8 W. von Heymann Germany · #1,097,465 worldwide 9 citations · 18 works
- 9 Sigrun Schmidt‐Traub Germany · #1,174,582 worldwide 0 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Orthopädische Praxis?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Outcomes, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Self-Efficacy, Professional Development, Coaching, Psychodrama and Religion.
- Political Science
- Shoulder Function
- Patient Rights
- Psychoanalysis
- Genetic Testing
- Sociology
- Quality
- Health Surveys
- Socioeconomic Status
- Healthcare Utilization
- Gender Studies
- Complications
- Meta-Analysis
- Philosophy
- Ethics
- Treatment
- Quality of Life
- Coaching
- Self-Efficacy
- Outcomes
- Epidemiology
- Rehabilitation
- Professional Development
- Psychodrama
- Religion
- Public Health
- History
- Epidemiological Study
- Chronic Diseases
- Medical Ethics
- End-of-Life Care
- Patient Care
- Germany
- Outcome Measurement
- Informed Consent
- Telemedicine
- Social Theory
- Physician Liability
- Reproductive Medicine
- Literature Analysis
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology39▲ 2.3×89 topics
- Outcomes24▲ 69×2 topics
- Rehabilitation21▲ 13×11 topics
- Self-Efficacy21▲ 18×2 topics
- Professional Development20▲ 24×2 topics
- Coaching20▲ 279×1 topic
- Psychodrama20▲ 261×1 topic
- Quality of Life17▲ 2.7×39 topics
- Religion16▲ 8.0×10 topics
- Treatment16▲ 3.1×34 topics
- Public Health15▲ 2.4×19 topics
- Ethics15▲ 7.0×9 topics
- History13▲ 4.2×10 topics
- Philosophy12▲ 6.5×8 topics
- Epidemiological Study12▲ 41×3 topics
- Meta-Analysis12▲ 4.6×13 topics
- Chronic Diseases11▲ 10×5 topics
- Complications11▲ 5.0×15 topics
- Medical Ethics10▲ 18×2 topics
- Gender Studies10▲ 16×2 topics
- End-of-Life Care10▲ 20×2 topics
- Healthcare Utilization10▲ 30×3 topics
- Patient Care10▲ 20×3 topics
- Socioeconomic Status10▲ 45×2 topics
- Germany10▲ 117×1 topic
- Health Surveys10▲ 117×1 topic
- Outcome Measurement10▲ 218×1 topic
- Quality10▲ 55×1 topic
- Informed Consent10▲ 29×2 topics
- Sociology10▲ 16×3 topics
- Telemedicine9▲ 16×5 topics
- Genetic Testing9▲ 18×4 topics
- Social Theory9▲ 74×2 topics
- Psychoanalysis9▲ 25×3 topics
- Physician Liability9▲ 49×2 topics
- Patient Rights8▲ 26×1 topic
- Reproductive Medicine8▲ 141×1 topic
- Shoulder Function8▲ 22×2 topics
- Literature Analysis8▲ 253×1 topic
- Political Science8▲ 59×1 topic
Which research topics does Orthopädische Praxis publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy, Health and Medical Studies, Medical Practices and Rehabilitation and Medical and Health Sciences Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy Social Psychology 20 works
- 2 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 10 works
- 3 Medical Practices and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 10 works
- 4 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8 works
- 5 Psychoanalysis and Social Critique Cultural Studies 8 works
- 6 Religion, Theology, and Education Religious studies 8 works
- 7 Psychiatric care and mental health services Clinical Psychology 7 works
- 8 Shoulder Injury and Treatment Surgery 7 works
- 9 Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Clinical Psychology 7 works
- 10 Biomedical and Chemical Research Surgery 6 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Orthopädische Praxis's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 33% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Münster
- University of Münster
- University Hospital Münster
- FH Münster
- Institut für Soziale Arbeit
- European Association of Social Psychology
- St. Franziskus Hospital
- CeNTech
- Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.