Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Company · Austin · United States

Semantic Designs (United States)

In research, Semantic Designs (United States) stands highest in Social Sciences (#1,212 of 16,945 worldwide), Computer Science (#1,343 of 7,020 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#5,905 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#3,999
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#966
of 8,685
Research works
467
▲ 28% vs 2013–17
Citations
2.9k
6.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
91%
world 28%

What is Semantic Designs (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #1,212 of 16,945 38.5%257
Computer ScienceField #1,343 of 7,020 36.1%137
Physical SciencesDomain #5,905 of 21,541 34.2%178

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Semantic Designs (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.99× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.51× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 5.31× its world share, 8 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.55× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 0.54× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 3.51× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.34× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.25× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.09× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.57× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Computer Science, 5.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Semantic Designs (United States)?

Ranked on the composite score, Lee Sharks and Lee Sharks lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Semantic Designs (United States).

  1. 1 Lee Sharks United States · #254,005 worldwide 81 citations · 23 works
  2. 2 Lee Sharks United States · #472,919 worldwide 30 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Semantic Designs (United States)

Which keywords describe research at Semantic Designs (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Semantic Web, Data Integration, Machine Learning, Knowledge Representation, Linked Data, Description Logics, Ontology and RDF.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 15 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 15 words, with their numbers
  1. Machine Learning3▲ 5.1×10 topics
  2. Semantic Web3▲ 166×3 topics
  3. Data Integration3▲ 88×3 topics
  4. Deep Learning3▲ 3.9×10 topics
  5. Knowledge Representation3▲ 150×3 topics
  6. Description Logics2▲ 251×2 topics
  7. Linked Data2▲ 306×2 topics
  8. Ontology2▲ 134×1 topic
  9. RDF2▲ 319×1 topic
  10. Globalization2▲ 3.9×3 topics
  11. Cybersecurity1▲ 28×2 topics
  12. Implicit Bias1▲ 147×2 topics
  13. Big Data1▲ 6.0×4 topics
  14. Aesthetics1▲ 66×1 topic
  15. Contemporary Art1▲ 460×1 topic

Which research topics does Semantic Designs (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Semantic Web and Ontologies, Art, Politics, and Modernism, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety.

  1. 1 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  2. 2 Art, Politics, and Modernism Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1 works
  3. 3 Racial and Ethnic Identity Research Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  4. 4 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 1 works
  5. 5 Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  6. 6 Critical Race Theory in Education Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  7. 7 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 1 works
  8. 8 Software Engineering Techniques and Practices Information Systems 1 works
  9. 9 Social and Intergroup Psychology Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  10. 10 Information and Cyber Security Information Systems 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available91.3%not open8.7%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.7%domestic only77.3%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Semantic Designs (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 28% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Austin

All research institutions in Austin

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.