Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore
In research, Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore stands highest in Social Sciences (#15,441 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #42,043 of 42,892
- Rank in Sweden
- #282 of 286
- Research works
- 188 ▲ 44% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 429 2.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 68% world 28%
What is Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #15,441 of 16,945 | 12.1% | 136 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 11.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 11.7×
- Social Sciences 2.6×
- Computer Science 1.8×
- Psychology 1.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Medicine 0.0×
Which keywords describe research at Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Pedagogy, Qualitative Research, Social Sciences, Communication, Healthcare, Ethics and Family Dynamics.
- Terminology
- Specialized Language
- Linguistic Borrowing
- Medieval
- Religion
- Learning
- Cultural Heritage
- Text Linguistics
- Historical Phonology
- Cultural History
- Lexicography
- Digital Communication
- Neural Machine Translation
- Linguistics
- Discourse Analysis
- Corpus Linguistics
- Family Dynamics
- Healthcare
- Social Sciences
- Pedagogy
- Education
- Qualitative Research
- Communication
- Ethics
- Phenomenology
- Sociolinguistics
- History
- Language Contact
- Statistical Machine Translation
- Language Variation
- Communication Practices
- Etymology
- Language
- Literature
- Knowledge Representation
- Methodology
- Culture
- Anglicisms
- Morphology
- Syntax
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education13▲ 13×9 topics
- Pedagogy12▲ 43×4 topics
- Qualitative Research12▲ 23×3 topics
- Social Sciences12▲ 138×2 topics
- Communication10▲ 56×4 topics
- Healthcare10▲ 15×2 topics
- Ethics10▲ 34×2 topics
- Family Dynamics10▲ 125×1 topic
- Phenomenology10▲ 151×1 topic
- Corpus Linguistics5▲ 41×4 topics
- Sociolinguistics5▲ 42×4 topics
- Discourse Analysis4▲ 29×2 topics
- History4▲ 10×9 topics
- Linguistics4▲ 38×4 topics
- Language Contact3▲ 55×3 topics
- Neural Machine Translation3▲ 53×1 topic
- Statistical Machine Translation3▲ 53×1 topic
- Digital Communication2▲ 59×2 topics
- Language Variation2▲ 73×2 topics
- Lexicography2▲ 46×2 topics
- Communication Practices2▲ 194×1 topic
- Cultural History2▲ 32×3 topics
- Etymology2▲ 79×2 topics
- Historical Phonology2▲ 79×2 topics
- Language2▲ 16×2 topics
- Text Linguistics2▲ 194×1 topic
- Literature2▲ 6.9×7 topics
- Cultural Heritage2▲ 6.3×7 topics
- Knowledge Representation2▲ 38×2 topics
- Learning2▲ 11×1 topic
- Methodology2▲ 72×1 topic
- Religion2▲ 7.1×4 topics
- Culture2▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Medieval2▲ 84×2 topics
- Anglicisms2▲ 107×1 topic
- Linguistic Borrowing2▲ 107×1 topic
- Morphology2▲ 16×2 topics
- Specialized Language2▲ 166×1 topic
- Syntax2▲ 40×2 topics
- Terminology2▲ 141×1 topic
Which research topics does Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Research in Social Sciences, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Linguistic research and analysis and Social and Educational Sciences.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Research in Social Sciences Education 10 works
- 2 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 3 works
- 3 Linguistic research and analysis Language and Linguistics 2 works
- 4 Social and Educational Sciences Education 2 works
- 5 Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity Language and Linguistics 2 works
- 6 linguistics and terminology studies Language and Linguistics 2 works
- 7 Software Engineering Techniques and Practices Information Systems 2 works
- 8 Lexicography and Language Studies Language and Linguistics 2 works
- 9 Linguistics and Cultural Studies Language and Linguistics 1 works
- 10 Historical and Archaeological Studies History 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 44% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Uppsala
- Uppsala University
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
- Uppsala University Hospital
- Swedish Veterinary Agency
- Geological Survey of Sweden
- Ludwig Cancer Research
- Akademiska Barnsjukhuset
- National Food Administration
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.