Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Government institution · Stockholm · Sweden

Swedish National Heritage Board

In research, Swedish National Heritage Board stands highest in Physical Sciences (#13,796 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#20,371
of 34,923
Rank in Sweden
#153
of 259
Research works
291
▼ 13% vs 2018-21
Citations
15k
50.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.13×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
34%
world 40%
International
12%
world 18%

What is Swedish National Heritage Board known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #13,796 of 17,446 9.7%150

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Swedish National Heritage Board sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Swedish National Heritage Board work in?

In 2022-now, 74% of research at Swedish National Heritage Board is in Social Sciences, 21% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Arts and Humanities (60%), Computer Science (11%), Decision Sciences (6%). It does 2.4× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 19 fractional works · 74.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 16 fractional works · 60.2% of its workHistory: 4 fractional works · 16.3% of its workArcheology: 4 fractional works · 15.8% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 4 fractional works · 15.5% of its workConservation: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMusic: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.3% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 21.4% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 10.7% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 7.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workRadiation: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKSwedish NationalHeritage Board26fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences0%Physical Sciences21%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences74%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Arts and Humanities1660.2%
    2. Decision Sciences26.3%
    3. Social Sciences14.9%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting01.9%
    5. Psychology01.1%
    1. Computer Science310.7%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.9%
    3. Engineering12.5%
    4. Materials Science12.2%
    5. Physics and Astronomy01.6%
    6. Environmental Science00.5%
    1. Medicine12.7%
    2. Health Professions01.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.2%
    2. Neuroscience00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 1.38× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.48× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.17× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.62× its world share, 1 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.73× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.14× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 20.84× its world share, 16 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 6.52× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 0.36× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.39× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 20.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities20.84×16 works
  2. Decision Sciences6.52×2 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.48×1 works
  4. Computer Science1.38×3 works
  5. Physics and Astronomy0.73×0 works
  6. Materials Science0.62×1 works
  7. Business, Management and Accounting0.60×0 works
  8. Health Professions0.47×0 works
  9. Social Sciences0.39×1 works
  10. Psychology0.36×0 works
  11. Engineering0.17×1 works
  12. Medicine0.14×1 works
  13. Environmental Science0.10×0 works
  14. Neuroscience0.06×0 works
  15. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Swedish National Heritage Board?

Ranked on the quality score, Inga Ullén, Torgny Wiederholm and Einar Mattsson lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Swedish National Heritage Board.

  1. 1 Inga Ullén Sweden · #1,620,768 worldwide 533 citations · 18 works
  2. 2 Torgny Wiederholm Sweden · #1,660,124 worldwide 2.1k citations · 28 works
  3. 3 Einar Mattsson Sweden · #1,725,317 worldwide 1.3k citations · 55 works
  4. 4 Marei Hacke Sweden · #2,047,620 worldwide 206 citations · 49 works
  5. 5 Åsa M. Larsson Sweden · #2,071,548 worldwide 240 citations · 33 works
  6. 6 Swedish National Data Service Sweden · #2,398,329 worldwide 3 citations · 42 works
  7. 7 Sven‐Olof Ryding Sweden · #2,684,079 worldwide 1.8k citations · 41 works
  8. 8 Gösta Ekehorn Sweden · #3,404,079 worldwide 136 citations · 36 works
  9. 9 Niclas Björck Sweden · #3,681,287 worldwide 102 citations · 18 works
  10. 10 Nils Ringstedt Sweden · #3,956,968 worldwide 38 citations · 19 works
All ranked researchers at Swedish National Heritage Board

What are the most cited papers from Swedish National Heritage Board?

The most cited paper from Swedish National Heritage Board is "An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach" (Lars Håkanson, 1980), with 9,700 citations. Next come "Assessment of heritability for personality, based on a short-form of the Eysenck personality inventory: A study of 12,898 twin pairs" (355) and "Chlorinated Phenols: Occurrence, Toxicity, Metabolism, And Environmental Impact" (352).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach Lars Håkanson · Water Research 1980 9,700
2 Assessment of heritability for personality, based on a short-form of the Eysenck personality inventory: A study of 12,898 twin pairs BIRGITTA FLODERUS-MYRHED, Nancy L. Pedersen, Ingrid Rasmuson · Behavior Genetics Mar 1980 355
3 Chlorinated Phenols: Occurrence, Toxicity, Metabolism, And Environmental Impact Ulf G. Ahlborg, Tuula Thunberg, Howard C. Spencer · Critical Reviews in Toxicology 1980 352
4 Influence of Pollution on Parasites of Aquatic Animals Rasul A. Khan, Jan Thulin · Advances in Parasitology/Advances in parasitology Book chapter 1991 320
5 Holocene land-cover reconstructions for studies on land cover-climate feedbacks Marie‐José Gaillard et al. · Climate of the past Open access 26 Jul 2010 314
All 58 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Swedish National Heritage Board?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Archaeology, Cultural Exchange, Cultural History, Scandinavia, Viking Age, Lexicography, Linguistics and Indo-European.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 22 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 22 words, with their numbers
  1. Archaeology5▲ 161×4 topics
  2. Cultural Exchange4▲ 139×2 topics
  3. Cultural History4▲ 140×2 topics
  4. Scandinavia4▲ 1170×1 topic
  5. Viking Age4▲ 1170×1 topic
  6. Lexicography4▲ 164×2 topics
  7. Linguistics4▲ 90×2 topics
  8. Indo-European3▲ 630×1 topic
  9. Language Evolution3▲ 324×1 topic
  10. Cultural Heritage3▲ 19×7 topics
  11. Mediterranean2▲ 72×2 topics
  12. Digital Repositories2▲ 182×2 topics
  13. Bronze Age2▲ 149×2 topics
  14. Data Sharing2▲ 186×2 topics
  15. Maritime Archaeology1▲ 282×1 topic
  16. Open Science1▲ 189×1 topic
  17. Scientific Data Management1▲ 189×1 topic
  18. Sea-Level Change1▲ 282×1 topic
  19. Archaeological Finds1▲ 334×1 topic
  20. Corded Ware Culture1▲ 334×1 topic
  21. Medieval Literature1▲ 211×1 topic
  22. Religious Practices1▲ 93×1 topic

Which research topics does Swedish National Heritage Board publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Historical and Archaeological Studies, Linguistics and language evolution, Maritime and Coastal Archaeology and Research Data Management Practices.

  1. 1 Historical and Archaeological Studies History 4 works
  2. 2 Linguistics and language evolution Language and Linguistics 3 works
  3. 3 Maritime and Coastal Archaeology Archeology 1 works
  4. 4 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 1 works
  5. 5 Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies Archeology 1 works
  6. 6 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
  7. 7 Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies Classics 1 works
  8. 8 Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Archeology 1 works
  9. 9 Archaeological Research and Protection Space and Planetary Science 1 works
  10. 10 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available33.9%not open66.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors12.4%domestic only87.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Swedish National Heritage Board's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 13% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Swedish National Heritage Board as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00012% in 2024.

still counting0.0020%0.0040%Swedish National Heritage Board0.00018% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Swedish National Heritage Board over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Stockholm

All research institutions in Stockholm

Share Swedish National Heritage Board's ranking

Swedish National Heritage Board on Science Explorer

A card with Swedish National Heritage Board's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Swedish National Heritage Board. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.