Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Anatomy and Medical Technology

Anatomy and Medical Technology is a research topic within Biomedical Engineering. Science Explorer counts 23k research works in it since 1950. 12.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the application of 3D printing and related technologies in medical anatomy education. It covers topics such as the use of 3D printing for anatomical models, surgical planning, virtual reality in anatomy education, and the impact of these technologies on medical curriculum and anatomical sciences. The papers also discuss the effectiveness of 3D printing in improving spatial anatomy learning and its potential advantages over traditional methods such as cadaver dissection.

  • 3D Printing
  • Anatomy Education
  • Medical Applications
  • Virtual Reality
  • Surgical Planning
  • Anatomical Models
  • Medical Imaging
  • Rapid Prototyping
  • Anatomical Sciences
  • Medical Curriculum
Research works
23k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+61%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Anatomy and Medical Technology research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.2k and 493 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.2k works
  2. 2 China 493 works
  3. 3 India 435 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 341 works
  5. 5 Germany 278 works
  6. 6 Brazil 230 works
  7. 7 Italy 225 works
  8. 8 Türkiye 199 works
  9. 9 Japan 170 works
  10. 10 Canada 147 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 31.6%China: 13.4%India: 11.8%United Kingdom: 9.3%6 others listed: 33.9%32%largest
United States1,163 · 31.6%China493 · 13.4%India435 · 11.8%United Kingdom341 · 9.3%6 others listed1,249 · 33.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Anatomy and Medical Technology research?

By volume in 2022–2025, All India Institute of Medical Sciences publishes the most Anatomy and Medical Technology research, followed by University College London and Harvard University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 25 works
  2. 2 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 19 works
  3. 3 Harvard UniversityUnited States 16 works
  4. 4 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 14 works
  5. 5 Imperial College LondonUnited Kingdom 14 works
  6. 6 University of TorontoCanada 14 works
  7. 7 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 14 works
  8. 8 Stanford UniversityUnited States 13 works
  9. 9 University of MichiganUnited States 13 works
  10. 10 University of British ColumbiaCanada 12 works

Who are the leading researchers in Anatomy and Medical Technology?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Anatomy and Medical Technology include David L. Davies.

  1. 1 David L. Davies United Kingdom 2.8k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Anatomy and Medical Technology research done?

The largest centres of Anatomy and Medical Technology research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Beijing (China), New York (United States) and São Paulo (Brazil).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 107 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 83 works
  3. 3 New York United States 56 works
  4. 4 São Paulo Brazil 55 works
  5. 5 Tokyo Japan 54 works
  6. 6 Seoul South Korea 52 works
  7. 7 Moscow Russia 48 works
  8. 8 New Delhi India 48 works
  9. 9 Istanbul Türkiye 47 works
  10. 10 Shanghai China 47 works
See Anatomy and Medical Technology on the map

Where is the best place to study Anatomy and Medical Technology?

Among universities, judged by research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, University College London and Semmelweis University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 23.66%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →All India Institute of Medical Sciences: 25, 12.8%University College London: 19, 16.4%Semmelweis University: 9, 19.6%Johns Hopkins University: 14, 29.1%Chinese University of Hong Kong: 11, 26.6%Harvard University: 16, 15.6%National and Kapodistrian University of Athens: 8, 32.2%Alexandria University: 10, 20.9%Seoul National University: 9, 28.5%Zhejiang University: 8, 34.9%Johns Hopkins Univer…Semmelweis UniversityUniversity College L…All India Institute …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 61.812.8%7.6×25 +146.0%
2 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 53.416.4%2.5×19 +190.2%
3 Semmelweis UniversityHungary 49.719.6%8.6×9 +29.3%
4 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 48.829.1%2.4×14 +55.1%
5 Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong 46.926.6%2.7×11 +33.6%
6 Harvard UniversityUnited States 43.015.6%2.3×16 +126.5%
7 National and Kapodistrian University of AthensGreece 42.932.2%3.0×8 +21.1%
8 Alexandria UniversityEgypt 40.420.9%3.9×10
9 Seoul National UniversitySouth Korea 37.128.5%2.0×9 +21.9%
10 Zhejiang UniversityChina 36.734.9%0.7×8 +21.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Anatomy and Medical Technology research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 61% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Anatomy and Medical Technology.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.