Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics is a research topic within Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1951. 15.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the biomechanics of traumatic brain injury, including the mechanical properties of brain tissue, head impact simulations, child safety seats, whiplash injury, and the effects of obesity on injury outcomes. It encompasses research on brain deformation, axonal damage, skull flexure, and the development of finite element models to simulate head impact biomechanics.

  • Brain Injury
  • Biomechanics
  • Head Impact
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Mechanical Properties
  • Finite Element Model
  • Child Safety Seats
  • Whiplash Injury
  • Cervical Spine
  • Obesity
Research works
13k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+5%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (538 and 510 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 538 works
  2. 2 United States 510 works
  3. 3 India 131 works
  4. 4 Germany 78 works
  5. 5 Japan 77 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 74 works
  7. 7 Canada 60 works
  8. 8 Poland 55 works
  9. 9 Australia 52 works
  10. 10 Italy 49 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 33.1%United States: 31.4%India: 8.1%Germany: 4.8%6 others listed: 22.6%33%largest
China538 · 33.1%United States510 · 31.4%India131 · 8.1%Germany78 · 4.8%6 others listed366 · 22.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, China Automotive Technology and Research Center publishes the most Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research, followed by Virginia Tech and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.

Who are the leading researchers in Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics include David C. Schwebel and Tuan Ngo.

  1. 1 David C. Schwebel United States 5k citations
  2. 2 Tuan Ngo Australia 2.6k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research done?

The largest centres of Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tianjin (China), Nanjing (China) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Tianjin.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 85 works
  2. 2 Tianjin China 46 works
  3. 3 Nanjing China 46 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 34 works
  5. 5 Chongqing China 32 works
  6. 6 Changsha China 29 works
  7. 7 Tokyo Japan 28 works
  8. 8 Xi'an China 27 works
  9. 9 Guangzhou China 21 works
  10. 10 New Delhi India 20 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. TianjinCN · 46.2 works4.7×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics than the world average.

See Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics on the map

Where is the best place to study Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics?

Among universities, judged by research, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Nanjing University of Science and Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 23.7%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →KTH Royal Institute of Technology: 9, 22.5%Indian Institute of Technology Delhi: 14, 21.9%Nanjing University of Science and Technology: 13, 24.2%Hebei University of Technology: 11, 19.0%Virginia Tech: 16, 11.3%Imperial College London: 9, 30.5%Beijing Institute of Technology: 10, 31.3%Central South University: 10, 26.0%Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics: 10, 21.5%Southeast University: 10, 28.8%Nanjing University o…KTH Royal Institute …Indian Institute of …Hebei University of …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 KTH Royal Institute of TechnologySweden 66.422.5%12.1×9 +86.8%
2 Indian Institute of Technology DelhiIndia 63.921.9%12.5×14
3 Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyChina 63.824.2%7.3×13 +352.1%
4 Hebei University of TechnologyChina 55.919.0%12.9×11
5 Virginia TechUnited States 55.211.3%13.9×16 +2.1%
6 Imperial College LondonUnited Kingdom 53.530.5%4.6×9 +65.7%
7 Beijing Institute of TechnologyChina 51.531.3%4.1×10 +120.9%
8 Central South UniversityChina 45.726.0%2.9×10 +174.9%
9 Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsChina 45.421.5%5.2×10 +131.7%
10 Southeast UniversityChina 43.728.8%3.5×10

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 5% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.