Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Anthropology

Colonialism, slavery, and trade

Colonialism, slavery, and trade is a research topic within Anthropology. Science Explorer counts 21k research works in it since 1950. 15.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the Transatlantic Slave Trade, its historical impact, and the experiences of enslaved Africans in the Americas. It delves into topics such as slave resistance, colonial economies, racial identity, legal rights, and the African diaspora in the Atlantic world.

  • Transatlantic Slave Trade
  • Atlantic History
  • Slavery
  • African Diaspora
  • Slave Resistance
  • Colonial America
  • Enslaved Africans
  • Racial Identity
  • Legal Rights
  • Plantation Economy
Research works
21k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
3.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.6%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+21%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Colonialism, slavery, and trade research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.3k and 474 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.3k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 474 works
  3. 3 Brazil 320 works
  4. 4 France 194 works
  5. 5 Canada 146 works
  6. 6 Germany 116 works
  7. 7 Spain 101 works
  8. 8 Netherlands 98 works
  9. 9 Australia 83 works
  10. 10 Italy 67 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 44.2%United Kingdom: 16.5%Brazil: 11.2%France: 6.7%6 others listed: 21.3%44%largest
United States1,270 · 44.2%United Kingdom474 · 16.5%Brazil320 · 11.2%France194 · 6.7%6 others listed612 · 21.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Colonialism, slavery, and trade research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Cambridge publishes the most Colonialism, slavery, and trade research, followed by University of Oxford and Universidade de São Paulo.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 41 works
  2. 2 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 32 works
  3. 3 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 27 works
  4. 4 Leiden UniversityNetherlands 24 works
  5. 5 Yale UniversityUnited States 21 works
  6. 6 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 21 works
  7. 7 University of ChicagoUnited States 21 works
  8. 8 Emory UniversityUnited States 19 works
  9. 9 Film IndependentUnited States 19 works
  10. 10 University of TorontoCanada 17 works

Who are the leading researchers in Colonialism, slavery, and trade?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Colonialism, slavery, and trade include Benoı̂t Roux and David J. Richardson.

  1. 1 Benoı̂t Roux United States 2.6k citations
  2. 2 David J. Richardson United Kingdom 2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Colonialism, slavery, and trade research done?

The largest centres of Colonialism, slavery, and trade research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Paris (France), São Paulo (Brazil) and Washington D.C. (United States).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 96 works
  2. 2 Paris France 75 works
  3. 3 São Paulo Brazil 62 works
  4. 4 Washington D.C. United States 51 works
  5. 5 New York United States 48 works
  6. 6 Lisbon Portugal 44 works
  7. 7 Cambridge United Kingdom 43 works
  8. 8 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 41 works
  9. 9 Los Angeles United States 41 works
  10. 10 Toronto Canada 39 works
See Colonialism, slavery, and trade on the map

Where is the best place to study Colonialism, slavery, and trade?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Cambridge, Utrecht University and Leiden University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 17.95%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Cambridge: 41, 12.6%Utrecht University: 16, 18.1%Leiden University: 24, 17.6%University of Bonn: 16, 20.5%University of Lisbon: 16, 15.0%Universidade Nova de Lisboa: 16, 19.7%University of Oxford: 32, 16.9%University of Leicester: 12, 14.5%European University Institute: 10, 20.9%Universidade Federal de São Paulo: 12, 23.7%University of BonnUtrecht UniversityLeiden UniversityUniversity of Cambri…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 68.312.6%11.4×41 +37.6%
2 Utrecht UniversityNetherlands 67.318.1%9.2×16 +180.2%
3 Leiden UniversityNetherlands 64.517.6%21.8×24 +20.6%
4 University of BonnGermany 62.420.5%14.5×16
5 University of LisbonPortugal 61.615.0%8.0×16 +195.9%
6 Universidade Nova de LisboaPortugal 61.419.7%16.9×16 +36.5%
7 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 61.116.9%7.6×32 +25.9%
8 University of LeicesterUnited Kingdom 60.414.5%15.6×12 +132.3%
9 European University InstituteItaly 59.220.9%39.4×10 +83.3%
10 Universidade Federal de São PauloBrazil 56.523.7%8.4×12 +115.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Colonialism, slavery, and trade research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 21% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Colonialism, slavery, and trade.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.