Science Explorer Interactive view Map

E-Learning and Knowledge Management

E-Learning and Knowledge Management is a research topic within Computer Science Applications. Science Explorer counts 33k research works in it since 1950. 15.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the innovation and management of e-learning, knowledge, and technology in educational settings. It encompasses topics such as remote learning, digital marketing, open access, informal learning, and the impact of technology on education. The cluster also explores the challenges and opportunities presented by the COVID-19 pandemic for e-learning and educational innovation.

  • E-Learning
  • Innovation
  • Knowledge Management
  • Technology
  • Educational Projects
  • Digital Marketing
  • Remote Learning
  • Informal Learning
  • Educational Technology
  • Open Access
Research works
33k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+50%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead E-Learning and Knowledge Management research?

By volume, Spain and Mexico publish the most (1.5k and 1.2k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Spain 1.5k works
  2. 2 Mexico 1.2k works
  3. 3 Ecuador 881 works
  4. 4 Colombia 660 works
  5. 5 Peru 622 works
  6. 6 United States 497 works
  7. 7 Brazil 433 works
  8. 8 Argentina 319 works
  9. 9 Chile 282 works
  10. 10 ?? 231 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Spain: 23.0%Mexico: 17.8%Ecuador: 13.3%Colombia: 10.0%6 others listed: 35.9%23%largest
Spain1,527 · 23.0%Mexico1,181 · 17.8%Ecuador881 · 13.3%Colombia660 · 10.0%6 others listed2,384 · 35.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead E-Learning and Knowledge Management research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad César Vallejo publishes the most E-Learning and Knowledge Management research, followed by Ação Educativa and Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador.

Who are the leading researchers in E-Learning and Knowledge Management?

The most-cited researchers publishing on E-Learning and Knowledge Management include Dragan Gašević.

  1. 1 Dragan Gašević Australia 1.9k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is E-Learning and Knowledge Management research done?

The largest centres of E-Learning and Knowledge Management research in 2022–2025 are Mexico City (Mexico), Madrid (Spain), Bogotá (Colombia) and Lima (Peru). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Quito, Durán and San Pedro.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Mexico City Mexico 295 works
  2. 2 Madrid Spain 284 works
  3. 3 Bogotá Colombia 259 works
  4. 4 Lima Peru 253 works
  5. 5 Guayaquil Ecuador 202 works
  6. 6 Trujillo Peru 196 works
  7. 7 São Paulo Brazil 180 works
  8. 8 Valencia Spain 143 works
  9. 9 Barcelona Spain 123 works
  10. 10 Panama City Panama 114 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Quito30.8 works199×
  2. Durán97.4 works132×
  3. San PedroCR · 23.1 works71×
  4. BabahoyoEC · 21.4 works69×
  5. EsmeraldasEC · 20.0 works68×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in E-Learning and Knowledge Management than the world average.

See E-Learning and Knowledge Management on the map

Where is the best place to study E-Learning and Knowledge Management?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Guayaquil, Tecnológico de Monterrey and Universidad de Salamanca score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.52%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Guayaquil: 86, 15.7%Tecnológico de Monterrey: 61, 26.8%Universidad de Salamanca: 64, 22.2%Universidad Estatal de Milagro: 74, 15.6%Politecnica Salesiana University: 20, 35.8%Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: 24, 24.6%Universidad Internacional De La Rioja: 50, 13.0%Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja: 32, 17.1%Autonomous University of Queretaro: 34, 18.4%Universidad César Vallejo: 167, 16.0%Tecnológico de Monte…Universidad de Salam…University of Guayaq…Universidad Estatal …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of GuayaquilEcuador 66.315.7%57.0×86 +916.9%
2 Tecnológico de MonterreyMexico 65.426.8%24.7×61 +97.5%
3 Universidad de SalamancaSpain 64.322.2%22.5×64 +139.5%
4 Universidad Estatal de MilagroEcuador 64.215.6%70.6×74 +395.8%
5 Politecnica Salesiana UniversityEcuador 64.035.8%29.2×20 +152.0%
6 Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorEcuador 62.224.6%21.3×24 +835.0%
7 Universidad Internacional De La RiojaSpain 61.113.0%42.1×50 +209.4%
8 Universidad Técnica Particular de LojaEcuador 60.717.1%52.0×32 +283.9%
9 Autonomous University of QueretaroMexico 60.418.4%34.0×34 +489.6%
10 Universidad César VallejoPeru 60.016.0%65.2×167

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is E-Learning and Knowledge Management research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 50% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are E-Learning and Knowledge Management.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.