Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

Engineering Structural Analysis Methods is a research topic within Mechanical Engineering. Science Explorer counts 16k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the analysis, modeling, and experimental study of bolted joints, threaded fasteners, and gasketed joints. It explores topics such as finite element analysis of tightening and loosening mechanisms, friction coefficients in torque-preloading relationships, bearing friction torque, and the effect of thread pitch on fatigue life. The papers also investigate the behavior of bolted joints under various loading conditions, the influence of lubrication on frictional characteristics, and methods to prevent self-loosening and improve anti-loosening performance.

  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Threaded Fasteners
  • Loosening Mechanism
  • Friction Coefficients
  • Bearing Friction
  • Gasketed Joints
  • Tightening Process
  • Elastic Interaction
  • Fatigue Life
  • Preload Relaxation
Research works
16k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.6k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+7%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
China
40% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

Which countries lead Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research?

By volume, China and Indonesia publish the most (681 and 354 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 China 681 works
  2. 2 Indonesia 354 works
  3. 3 United States 174 works
  4. 4 India 134 works
  5. 5 Japan 104 works
  6. 6 Germany 83 works
  7. 7 Türkiye 52 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 48 works
  9. 9 Russia 41 works
  10. 10 South Korea 38 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 39.8%Indonesia: 20.7%United States: 10.2%India: 7.9%6 others listed: 21.5%40%largest
China681 · 39.8%Indonesia354 · 20.7%United States174 · 10.2%India134 · 7.9%6 others listed367 · 21.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research?

By volume in 2022-now, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology publishes the most Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research, followed by Southwest Jiaotong University and Dalian University of Technology.

Who are the leading researchers in Engineering Structural Analysis Methods?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Engineering Structural Analysis Methods include Lei Jiang, Michael J. Mack and K. Satô.

  1. 1 Lei Jiang China 214k citations
  2. 2 Michael J. Mack United States 154k citations
  3. 3 K. Satô France 148k citations
  4. 4 Y. Nagasaka Japan 138k citations
  5. 5 Hao Chen China 118k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Engineering Structural Analysis Methods?

The most cited paper in Engineering Structural Analysis Methods is "Plastic instability under plane stress" (H. W. Swift, 1952), with 2,016 citations. Next come "Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course" (1,751) and "Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand" (1,031).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Plastic instability under plane stress H. W. Swift · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids Oct 1952 2,016
2 Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course C. A. Brebbia, José Domínguez Abascal, John L. Tassoulas · Journal of Applied Mechanics Open access Sep 1991 1,751
3 Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand Lymon C. Reese, William R. Cox, Francis D. Koop · Offshore Technology Conference Conference paper 5 May 1974 1,031
4 Theory of Plasticity J. Chakrabarty, W. J. Drugan · Journal of Applied Mechanics Mar 1988 859
5 A New Method of Analyzing Stresses and Strains in Work-Hardening Plastic Solids William Prager · Journal of Applied Mechanics Dec 1956 824
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research done?

The largest centres of Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Tokyo (Japan). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Surabaya and Shenyang.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 128 works
  2. 2 ShanghaiChina 53 works
  3. 3 JakartaIndonesia 44 works
  4. 4 TokyoJapan 42 works
  5. 5 Xi'anChina 41 works
  6. 6 SurabayaIndonesia 39 works
  7. 7 ChengduChina 34 works
  8. 8 NanjingChina 33 works
  9. 9 WuhanChina 32 works
  10. 10 HangzhouChina 22 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. SurabayaID · 38.9 works3.7×
  2. ShenyangCN · 21.4 works3.4×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Engineering Structural Analysis Methods than the world average.

See Engineering Structural Analysis Methods on the map

Where is the best place to study Engineering Structural Analysis Methods?

Among universities, judged by research, Southwest Jiaotong University, Northeastern University and Dalian University of Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 25.65%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Southwest Jiaotong U…Northeastern Univers…Dalian University of…Tianjin University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChina 90.743.4%10.8×16 +48.1%
2Northeastern UniversityChina 69.342.3%6.0×10 +217.1%
3Dalian University of TechnologyChina 66.929.2%7.4×14 +5.6%
4Tianjin UniversityChina 55.023.2%4.6×11 +87.4%
5Tongji UniversityChina 53.924.9%3.9×12 +30.3%
6Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChina 53.524.2%5.1×11 +133.6%
7Sepuluh Nopember Institute of TechnologyIndonesia 53.41.1%21.3×18 +15.0%
8Harbin Engineering UniversityChina 52.919.3%11.4×11 +21.9%
9Beijing University of TechnologyChina 47.525.7%6.2×8 +87.8%
10China University of Petroleum, BeijingChina 44.823.2%11.7×9 +5.5%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Engineering Structural Analysis Methods, country by country

Is Engineering Structural Analysis Methods research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 7% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2011. The fastest-growing topics are Engineering Structural Analysis Methods.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Engineering Structural Analysis Methods as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.010% in 2024.

still counting0.010%0.020%0.030%Engineering Structural Analysis Methods0.0093% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Engineering Structural Analysis Methods over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Engineering Structural Analysis Methods10.4% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Engineering Structural Analysis Methods. Posts are plain text and can be reported.