Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis is a research topic within Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 22.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on geotechnical engineering, particularly on factors of safety and reliability. It covers topics such as slope stability analysis, spatial variability of soil properties, probabilistic methods for stability analysis, tunneling effects, and ground movements due to excavation. The papers also delve into finite element analysis, Bayesian optimization for predicting soil properties, and the impact of tunneling on existing infrastructure.

  • Slope Stability Analysis
  • Spatial Variability
  • Probabilistic Methods
  • Tunneling
  • Soil Properties
  • Reliability Analysis
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Bayesian Optimization
  • Ground Movements
  • Excavation
Research works
29k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.6k
per year above
Top-10% rate
22.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+75%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (4.3k and 679 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 4.3k works
  2. 2 India 679 works
  3. 3 United States 400 works
  4. 4 Iran 192 works
  5. 5 Türkiye 180 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 149 works
  7. 7 Australia 148 works
  8. 8 Italy 143 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 135 works
  10. 10 Canada 133 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 66.7%India: 10.5%United States: 6.2%Iran: 3.0%6 others listed: 13.7%67%largest
China4,322 · 66.7%India679 · 10.5%United States400 · 6.2%Iran192 · 3.0%6 others listed888 · 13.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Tongji University publishes the most Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research, followed by Southwest Jiaotong University and Central South University.

Who are the leading researchers in Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis include Zdeněk P. Bažant and Dan M. Frangopol.

  1. 1 Zdeněk P. Bažant United States 2.8k citations
  2. 2 Dan M. Frangopol United States 2.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research done?

The largest centres of Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Wuhan (China) and Chengdu (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Fuxin, Dhanbad and Xuzhou.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 744 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 328 works
  3. 3 Wuhan China 286 works
  4. 4 Chengdu China 281 works
  5. 5 Nanjing China 225 works
  6. 6 Changsha China 218 works
  7. 7 Xi'an China 211 works
  8. 8 Hangzhou China 137 works
  9. 9 Chongqing China 136 works
  10. 10 Guangzhou China 119 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. FuxinCN · 24.1 works17×
  2. DhanbadIN · 26.5 works15×
  3. XuzhouCN · 109.3 works15×
  4. PatnaIN · 43.5 works13×
  5. RoorkeeIN · 46.0 works12×
  6. YichangCN · 22.1 works11×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis than the world average.

See Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis on the map

Where is the best place to study Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis?

Among universities, judged by research, Chang'an University, China University of Mining and Technology and China University of Geosciences score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 34.27%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Chang'an University: 80, 33.7%China University of Mining and Technology: 106, 23.1%China University of Geosciences: 62, 46.6%Beijing University of Technology: 61, 37.1%Central South University: 144, 29.4%Southwest Jiaotong University: 148, 30.5%Tongji University: 185, 24.9%Thammasat University: 23, 42.2%National Institute of Technology Patna: 32, 42.2%Chongqing University: 63, 33.0%China University of …Beijing University o…Chang'an UniversityChina University of …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Chang'an UniversityChina 74.233.7%26.3×80 +183.6%
2 China University of Mining and TechnologyChina 70.623.1%16.8×106 +237.5%
3 China University of GeosciencesChina 70.446.6%17.0×62 +6.6%
4 Beijing University of TechnologyChina 68.837.1%10.8×61 +98.5%
5 Central South UniversityChina 67.329.4%10.9×144 +42.9%
6 Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChina 66.130.5%23.8×148 +17.8%
7 Tongji UniversityChina 65.224.9%18.0×185 +18.3%
8 Thammasat UniversityThailand 64.642.2%17.0×23
9 National Institute of Technology PatnaIndia 64.042.2%27.6×32
10 Chongqing UniversityChina 63.333.0%7.2×63 +153.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 75% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.