Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics is a research topic within Civil and Structural Engineering. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1950. 19.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on soil mechanics in geotechnical engineering practice, with a particular emphasis on topics such as liquefaction resistance, particle shape effects on soil behavior, deformation measurement techniques, shear deformation of granular media, cone penetration tests, breakage mechanics, assessment of soil liquefaction potential, numerical simulations of granular media behavior, pile foundation design, and geotechnical centrifuge modelling.

  • Liquefaction Resistance
  • Particle Shape Effects
  • Deformation Measurement
  • Shear Deformation
  • Cone Penetration Tests
  • Breakage Mechanics
  • Soil Liquefaction Potential
  • Granular Media Simulation
  • Pile Foundation Design
  • Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling
Research works
25k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
19.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+54%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (2.2k and 480 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.2k works
  2. 2 India 480 works
  3. 3 United States 429 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 214 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 185 works
  6. 6 Japan 173 works
  7. 7 Iran 164 works
  8. 8 Australia 149 works
  9. 9 Canada 140 works
  10. 10 Türkiye 132 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 51.5%India: 11.3%United States: 10.1%Indonesia: 5.0%6 others listed: 22.1%51%largest
China2,192 · 51.5%India480 · 11.3%United States429 · 10.1%Indonesia214 · 5.0%6 others listed942 · 22.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Tongji University publishes the most Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research, followed by Zhejiang University and Hohai University.

Who are the leading researchers in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics include O. C. Zienkiewicz.

  1. 1 O. C. Zienkiewicz United Kingdom 1.8k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research done?

The largest centres of Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Shanghai (China) and Hangzhou (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Roorkee.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 312 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 187 works
  3. 3 Shanghai China 186 works
  4. 4 Hangzhou China 143 works
  5. 5 Wuhan China 139 works
  6. 6 Changsha China 88 works
  7. 7 Tianjin China 86 works
  8. 8 Tehran Iran 83 works
  9. 9 Xi'an China 82 works
  10. 10 Guangzhou China 73 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. RoorkeeIN · 39.1 works15×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics than the world average.

See Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics on the map

Where is the best place to study Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics?

Among universities, judged by research, China University of Geosciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Chang'an University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.99%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →China University of Geosciences: 24, 35.7%Hong Kong Polytechnic University: 37, 24.2%Chang'an University: 30, 21.4%National Institute of Technology Patna: 13, 34.3%Tongji University: 102, 14.1%Beijing University of Technology: 36, 17.3%Chongqing University: 41, 17.7%Wenzhou University: 16, 19.6%Hohai University: 62, 12.3%Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee: 35, 13.3%China University of …National Institute o…Hong Kong Polytechni…Chang'an University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 China University of GeosciencesChina 72.435.7%9.4×24 +83.5%
2 Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong 68.524.2%7.8×37 +83.6%
3 Chang'an UniversityChina 68.021.4%14.7×30 +163.5%
4 National Institute of Technology PatnaIndia 64.334.3%16.6×13
5 Tongji UniversityChina 63.914.1%14.4×102 +34.7%
6 Beijing University of TechnologyChina 61.717.3%9.2×36 +139.9%
7 Chongqing UniversityChina 61.517.7%6.9×41 +787.8%
8 Wenzhou UniversityChina 59.519.6%13.5×16 +127.2%
9 Hohai UniversityChina 57.412.3%20.4×62 +19.3%
10 Indian Institute of Technology RoorkeeIndia 56.313.3%14.1×35 +74.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 54% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.