Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation is a research topic within Geology. Science Explorer counts 5k research works in it since 1950. 10.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the assessment, conservation, and promotion of geotourism, geoheritage, and geodiversity. It explores the sustainable management of natural and cultural landscapes, the establishment of global geoparks, and the integration of geodiversity into ecosystem service decisions. The research emphasizes the importance of balancing tourism development with the preservation of geological and geomorphological sites.
- Geotourism
- Geoheritage
- Geodiversity
- Geoconservation
- Geomorphosites
- Sustainable Tourism
- Cultural Landscape
- Global Geoparks Network
- Ecosystem Services
- Biodiversity
- Research works
- 5k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 536 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.8% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +33% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
Brazil
22% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research?
By volume, Brazil and Indonesia publish the most (224 and 142 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Brazil 224 works
- 2
Indonesia 142 works
- 3
United States 121 works
- 4
France 104 works
- 5
Italy 98 works
- 6
India 82 works
- 7
Spain 76 works
- 8
China 75 works
- 9
Portugal 54 works
- 10
United Kingdom 54 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research?
By volume in 2022-now, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research, followed by Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidade de São Paulo.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 38 works
- 2
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Spain 20 works
- 3
Universidade de São Paulo
Brazil 15 works
- 4
University of Minho
Portugal 13 works
- 5
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Italy 12 works
- 6
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Greece 11 works
- 7
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 11 works
- 8
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Brazil 10 works
- 9
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brazil 10 works
- 10
University of Coimbra
Portugal 10 works
Who are the leading researchers in Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation include Robert A. Holt and Hai Cheng.
- 1
Robert A. Holt
Canada 156k citations
- 2
Hai Cheng
China 81k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research done?
The largest centres of Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research in 2022-now are Paris (France), Madrid (Spain), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) and São Paulo (Brazil).
Where is the best place to study Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation?
Among universities, judged by research, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University of Minho and Universidade de São Paulo score highest, combining citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens |
85.4 | 58.8% | 15.1× | 12 | +183.4% |
| 2 | University of Minho |
75.9 | 33.7% | 24.3× | 13 | +39.7% |
| 3 | Universidade de São Paulo |
52.3 | 6.6% | 4.8× | 15 | +67.9% |
| 4 | University of Coimbra |
50.5 | 22.2% | 13.8× | 10 | +12.5% |
| 5 | University of Wrocław |
40.9 | 26.4% | 28.5× | 9 | +11.9% |
| 6 | Southern Federal University |
40.7 | 11.6% | 36.8× | 10 | +59.9% |
| 7 | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
37.5 | 4.6% | 18.6× | 10 | +27.2% |
| 8 | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
31.9 | 2.0% | 16.1× | 10 | +71.7% |
| 9 | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
31.9 | 14.2% | 5.9× | 9 | +95.1% |
| 10 | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
27.0 | 7.9% | 6.7× | 10 | +161.2% |
| 11 | Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
23.9 | 2.0% | 8.6× | 10 | -27.2% |
| 12 | Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta |
23.6 | 3.5% | 38.9× | 9 | +98.7% |
Universities only. The score blends citation excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation, country by countryIs Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 33% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0055% in 2024.
Fractional works of Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.