Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Anthropology

Indigenous Cultures and History

Indigenous Cultures and History is a research topic within Anthropology. Science Explorer counts 8.5k research works in it since 1950. 17.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the complex interactions between indigenous peoples and the state, focusing on issues such as land rights, cultural identity, social exclusion, and the impact of state policies on indigenous communities. It delves into colonial history, frontier studies, and ethnographic research to understand the experiences of indigenous peoples at the national margins in Latin America.

  • Indigenous Peoples
  • State Policies
  • Frontier Studies
  • Ethnographic Research
  • Cultural Identity
  • Colonial History
  • Land Rights
  • Social Exclusion
  • Memory and Identity
  • Ethnic Politics
Research works
8.5k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.4k
per year above
Top-10% rate
17.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+28%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Indigenous Cultures and History research?

By volume, Argentina and Brazil publish the most (584 and 144 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Argentina 584 works
  2. 2 Brazil 144 works
  3. 3 Mexico 133 works
  4. 4 Chile 106 works
  5. 5 United States 102 works
  6. 6 Spain 99 works
  7. 7 Colombia 69 works
  8. 8 France 57 works
  9. 9 Peru 55 works
  10. 10 Ecuador 26 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Argentina: 42.5%Brazil: 10.5%Mexico: 9.6%Chile: 7.7%6 others listed: 29.6%43%largest
Argentina584 · 42.5%Brazil144 · 10.5%Mexico133 · 9.6%Chile106 · 7.7%6 others listed407 · 29.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Indigenous Cultures and History research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas publishes the most Indigenous Cultures and History research, followed by Universidad de Buenos Aires and Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

Who are the leading researchers in Indigenous Cultures and History?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Indigenous Cultures and History include Victòria Reyes-García and Barry Turner.

  1. 1 Victòria Reyes-García Spain 672 citations
  2. 2 Barry Turner United Kingdom 638 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Indigenous Cultures and History research done?

The largest centres of Indigenous Cultures and History research in 2022–2025 are Buenos Aires (Argentina), Mexico City (Mexico), Madrid (Spain) and Santiago (Chile). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in San Miguel de Tucumán.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Buenos Aires Argentina 248 works
  2. 2 Mexico City Mexico 65 works
  3. 3 Madrid Spain 47 works
  4. 4 Santiago Chile 45 works
  5. 5 Córdoba Argentina 39 works
  6. 6 La Plata Argentina 33 works
  7. 7 Bogotá Colombia 30 works
  8. 8 Lima Peru 27 works
  9. 9 San Miguel de Tucumán Argentina 26 works
  10. 10 Paris France 25 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. San Miguel de TucumánAR · 26.2 works148×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Indigenous Cultures and History than the world average.

See Indigenous Cultures and History on the map

Where is the best place to study Indigenous Cultures and History?

Among universities, judged by research, National University of Tucumán, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 22.17%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →National University of Tucumán: 11, 42.2%Universidad de Buenos Aires: 81, 12.5%Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: 10, 22.1%Universidad Nacional de La Plata: 30, 22.9%University of Chile: 10, 30.0%University of Tarapacá: 12, 20.7%National University of Salta: 12, 24.0%Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 21, 14.0%National University of Río Negro: 20, 10.1%National University of Jujuy: 11, 23.2%National University …Universidad Nacional…Pontificia Universid…Universidad de Bueno…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 National University of TucumánArgentina 63.042.2%184.4×11 -14.0%
2 Universidad de Buenos AiresArgentina 58.512.5%137.9×81 +43.0%
3 Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileChile 57.622.1%22.1×10 +91.3%
4 Universidad Nacional de La PlataArgentina 56.522.9%101.1×30 +13.1%
5 University of ChileChile 56.230.0%20.6×10 +3.7%
6 University of TarapacáChile 55.220.7%136.6×12 +10.8%
7 National University of SaltaArgentina 53.724.0%404.0×12 +53.0%
8 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico 52.114.0%14.6×21 +79.7%
9 National University of Río NegroArgentina 51.510.1%538.5×20 +106.5%
10 National University of JujuyArgentina 49.123.2%529.7×11 +17.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Indigenous Cultures and History research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 28% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Indigenous Cultures and History.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.