Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation

Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation is a research topic within Clinical Psychology. Science Explorer counts 2.3k research works in it since 1967. 14.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in clinical studies, psychiatry, and psychology. It includes research on psychopathological profiles, neurobiological correlates, therapeutic approaches, forensic contexts, cultural semiotics, gender dysphoria, emotional distress, personality disorders, neural correlates, and psychodiagnostic tools.

  • Psychopathological Profiles
  • Neurobiological Correlates
  • Therapeutic Approaches
  • Forensic Context
  • Cultural Semiotics
  • Gender Dysphoria
  • Emotional Distress
  • Personality Disorders
  • Neural Correlates
  • Psychodiagnostic Tools
Research works
2.3k
fractional, since 1967
In the world top 10%
326
per year above
Top-10% rate
14.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+146%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?

By volume, Indonesia and ?? publish the most (818 and 23 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Indonesia 818 works
  2. 2 ?? 23 works
  3. 3 Malaysia 19 works
  4. 4 United States 16 works
  5. 5 India 12 works
  6. 6 Finland 11 works
  7. 7 Iran 10 works
  8. 8 China 8 works
  9. 9 Pakistan 5 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 4 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Indonesia: 88.4%??: 2.5%Malaysia: 2.0%United States: 1.7%6 others listed: 5.4%88%largest
Indonesia818 · 88.4%??23 · 2.5%Malaysia19 · 2.0%United States16 · 1.7%6 others listed50 · 5.4%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta publishes the most Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research, followed by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu and Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Where is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research done?

The largest centres of Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research in 2022–2025 are Yogyakarta (Indonesia), Bandung (Indonesia), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Medan (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Denpasar, Yogyakarta and Surakarta.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Yogyakarta Indonesia 76 works
  2. 2 Bandung Indonesia 69 works
  3. 3 Jakarta Indonesia 61 works
  4. 4 Medan Indonesia 53 works
  5. 5 Surabaya Indonesia 49 works
  6. 6 Denpasar Indonesia 42 works
  7. 7 Makassar Indonesia 37 works
  8. 8 Semarang Indonesia 35 works
  9. 9 Surakarta Indonesia 31 works
  10. 10 Bengkulu Indonesia 31 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. DenpasarID · 42.3 works29×
  2. YogyakartaID · 76.3 works21×
  3. SurakartaID · 30.8 works16×
  4. BengkuluID · 30.7 works16×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation than the world average.

See Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation on the map

Where is the best place to study Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation?

Among universities, judged by research, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu and Universitas Sumatera Utara score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 15.2%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta: 28, 13.6%Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu: 27, 13.4%Universitas Sumatera Utara: 11, 23.3%Universitas Gadjah Mada: 17, 9.0%University of Indonesia: 15, 10.3%Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta: 9, 18.2%Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung: 14, 18.1%Sebelas Maret University: 11, 11.6%Universitas Negeri Surabaya: 9, 20.5%State University of Semarang: 12, 14.0%Universitas Sumatera…Sunan Kalijaga State…Institut Agama Islam…Universitas Gadjah M…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University YogyakartaIndonesia 55.813.6%60.5×28 +623.3%
2 Institut Agama Islam Negeri BengkuluIndonesia 44.513.4%20.2×27
3 Universitas Sumatera UtaraIndonesia 44.523.3%18.2×11
4 Universitas Gadjah MadaIndonesia 44.39.0%20.2×17 +125.0%
5 University of IndonesiaIndonesia 41.810.3%13.2×15 +166.7%
6 Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University JakartaIndonesia 41.118.2%27.9×9 +162.5%
7 Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University BandungIndonesia 40.218.1%40.5×14
8 Sebelas Maret UniversityIndonesia 38.611.6%12.5×11 +611.1%
9 Universitas Negeri SurabayaIndonesia 37.820.5%13.1×9
10 State University of SemarangIndonesia 35.814.0%16.1×12 +91.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 146% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.