Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Clinical Psychology

Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation

Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation is a research topic within Clinical Psychology. Science Explorer counts 2.3k research works in it since 1967. 9.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in clinical studies, psychiatry, and psychology. It includes research on psychopathological profiles, neurobiological correlates, therapeutic approaches, forensic contexts, cultural semiotics, gender dysphoria, emotional distress, personality disorders, neural correlates, and psychodiagnostic tools.

  • Psychopathological Profiles
  • Neurobiological Correlates
  • Therapeutic Approaches
  • Forensic Context
  • Cultural Semiotics
  • Gender Dysphoria
  • Emotional Distress
  • Personality Disorders
  • Neural Correlates
  • Psychodiagnostic Tools
Research works
2.3k
fractional, since 1967
In the world top 10%
223
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+140%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
Indonesia
88% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation

Which countries lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?

By volume, Indonesia and ?? publish the most (1.2k and 32 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Indonesia 1.2k works
  2. 2 ?? 32 works
  3. 3 United States 27 works
  4. 4 Malaysia 23 works
  5. 5 Finland 21 works
  6. 6 India 18 works
  7. 7 China 11 works
  8. 8 Iran 11 works
  9. 9 United Kingdom 8 works
  10. 10 Australia 8 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Indonesia: 88.0%??: 2.4%United States: 2.0%Malaysia: 1.8%6 others listed: 5.8%88%largest
Indonesia1,165 · 88.0%??32 · 2.4%United States27 · 2.0%Malaysia23 · 1.8%6 others listed77 · 5.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?

By volume in 2022-now, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu publishes the most Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research, followed by Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta and University of National Education.

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Institut Agama Islam Negeri BengkuluIndonesia 34 works
  2. 2 Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University YogyakartaIndonesia 33 works
  3. 3 University of National EducationIndonesia 24 works
  4. 4 Universitas Gadjah MadaIndonesia 23 works
  5. 5 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera UtaraIndonesia 23 works
  6. 6 Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University BandungIndonesia 22 works
  7. 7 State University of MedanIndonesia 22 works
  8. 8 University of IndonesiaIndonesia 20 works
  9. 9 State University of SemarangIndonesia 19 works
  10. 10 Hasanuddin UniversityIndonesia 19 works

Who are the leading researchers in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation include Raymond C. Rosen.

  1. 1 Raymond C. Rosen United States 63k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation?

The most cited paper in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation is "Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders" (Hans Wijbrand Hoek, Daphne van Hoeken, 2003), with 1,475 citations. Next come "REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS" (1,264) and "DSM IV-TR" (555).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders Hans Wijbrand Hoek, Daphne van Hoeken · International Journal of Eating Disorders 13 Oct 2003 1,475
2 REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS Rosemary J. Basson, Jennifer R. Berman, Arthur L. “Bud” Burnett et al. · The Journal of Urology Mar 2000 1,264
3 DSM IV-TR Victor R. Preedy, Ronald R. Watson Book chapter 17 Sep 2009 555
4 The Neurobiological Approach to Premature Ejaculation Marcel D. Waldinger · The Journal of Urology Dec 2002 492
5 Incidence of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant agents: a prospective multicenter study of 1022 outpatients. Spanish Working Group for the Study of Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction. Angel Luis Montejo, Ginés Llorca, Juan A Izquierdo et al. · PubMed 2001 464
All 99 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research done?

The largest centres of Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research in 2022-now are Bandung (Indonesia), Yogyakarta (Indonesia), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Medan (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Denpasar, Yogyakarta and Surakarta.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BandungIndonesia 107 works
  2. 2 YogyakartaIndonesia 98 works
  3. 3 JakartaIndonesia 94 works
  4. 4 MedanIndonesia 78 works
  5. 5 SurabayaIndonesia 73 works
  6. 6 DenpasarIndonesia 71 works
  7. 7 SemarangIndonesia 52 works
  8. 8 MakassarIndonesia 50 works
  9. 9 SurakartaIndonesia 43 works
  10. 10 MalangIndonesia 41 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. DenpasarID · 70.8 works35×
  2. YogyakartaID · 97.8 works19×
  3. SurakartaID · 43.2 works17×
  4. BandungID · 107.5 works15×
  5. PekanbaruID · 25.7 works15×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation than the world average.

See Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation on the map

Where is the best place to study Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation?

Among universities, judged by research, State University of Semarang, University of Indonesia and Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%5%10%15%mean 9.8%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →University of Indone…State University of …Sunan Kalijaga State…Institut Agama Islam…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1State University of SemarangIndonesia 72.012.5%21.2×19 +298.5%
2University of IndonesiaIndonesia 70.713.8%14.3×20 +75.5%
3Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University YogyakartaIndonesia 70.69.0%55.5×33 +79.9%
4Institut Agama Islam Negeri BengkuluIndonesia 66.58.4%20.1×34 +75.8%
5Universitas Gadjah MadaIndonesia 60.87.5%20.1×23 +245.6%
6Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University BandungIndonesia 56.48.6%52.5×22 +170.5%
7Universitas Negeri SurabayaIndonesia 55.610.1%17.7×16 +80.7%
8Hasanuddin UniversityIndonesia 55.27.6%23.4×19 +307.9%
9Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungIndonesia 54.311.6%29.1×13 +495.8%
10Walisongo State Islamic UniversityIndonesia 53.28.9%51.7×10 +200.8%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation, country by country

Is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 140% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0033% in 2024.

still counting0.0050%0.010%Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation0.0095% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation9.8% in 20252020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.