Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation
Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation is a research topic within Clinical Psychology. Science Explorer counts 2.3k research works in it since 1967. 14.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in clinical studies, psychiatry, and psychology. It includes research on psychopathological profiles, neurobiological correlates, therapeutic approaches, forensic contexts, cultural semiotics, gender dysphoria, emotional distress, personality disorders, neural correlates, and psychodiagnostic tools.
- Psychopathological Profiles
- Neurobiological Correlates
- Therapeutic Approaches
- Forensic Context
- Cultural Semiotics
- Gender Dysphoria
- Emotional Distress
- Personality Disorders
- Neural Correlates
- Psychodiagnostic Tools
- Research works
- 2.3k fractional, since 1967
- In the world top 10%
- 326 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 14.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +146% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?
By volume, Indonesia and ?? publish the most (818 and 23 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Indonesia 818 works
- 2 ?? 23 works
- 3 Malaysia 19 works
- 4 United States 16 works
- 5 India 12 works
- 6 Finland 11 works
- 7 Iran 10 works
- 8 China 8 works
- 9 Pakistan 5 works
- 10 United Kingdom 4 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta publishes the most Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research, followed by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu and Universitas Gadjah Mada.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta Indonesia 28 works
- 2 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu Indonesia 27 works
- 3 Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia 17 works
- 4 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Indonesia 16 works
- 5 University of Indonesia Indonesia 15 works
- 6 State University of Medan Indonesia 15 works
- 7 Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung Indonesia 14 works
- 8 Hasanuddin University Indonesia 13 works
- 9 UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya Indonesia 13 works
- 10 Mulawarman University Indonesia 12 works
Where is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research done?
The largest centres of Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research in 2022–2025 are Yogyakarta (Indonesia), Bandung (Indonesia), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Medan (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Denpasar, Yogyakarta and Surakarta.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- DenpasarID · 42.3 works29×
- YogyakartaID · 76.3 works21×
- SurakartaID · 30.8 works16×
- BengkuluID · 30.7 works16×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation?
Among universities, judged by research, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu and Universitas Sumatera Utara score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta Indonesia | 55.8 | 13.6% | 60.5× | 28 | +623.3% |
| 2 | Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu Indonesia | 44.5 | 13.4% | 20.2× | 27 | — |
| 3 | Universitas Sumatera Utara Indonesia | 44.5 | 23.3% | 18.2× | 11 | — |
| 4 | Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia | 44.3 | 9.0% | 20.2× | 17 | +125.0% |
| 5 | University of Indonesia Indonesia | 41.8 | 10.3% | 13.2× | 15 | +166.7% |
| 6 | Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta Indonesia | 41.1 | 18.2% | 27.9× | 9 | +162.5% |
| 7 | Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung Indonesia | 40.2 | 18.1% | 40.5× | 14 | — |
| 8 | Sebelas Maret University Indonesia | 38.6 | 11.6% | 12.5× | 11 | +611.1% |
| 9 | Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia | 37.8 | 20.5% | 13.1× | 9 | — |
| 10 | State University of Semarang Indonesia | 35.8 | 14.0% | 16.1× | 12 | +91.7% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 146% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Semiotics and Cultural Interpretation.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.