Georgia vs North Macedonia
On research quality in 2022-now, North Macedonia ranks #119 in the world and Georgia #120, of 189 countries. Georgia stands higher in 8 of the 15 fields both publish in, North Macedonia in 7.
Research profiles alike: 0.57similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Georgia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #120
- #129 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 11k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 3.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 55%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Classics, Archeology.
North Macedonia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #119
- #144 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 7.9k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 5.5%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 63%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Finance, Medical Laboratory Technology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
North Macedonia leads on 6 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. Georgia leads on 2 of 9 measures: output and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #120Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#119
- 0.40×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.53×
- 11kOutputfractional works, 2022-now7.9k
- 3.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited5.5%
- 5.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work7.4
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 55%Open accessof its works free to read, all time63%
- 26%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time38%
- +81%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+25%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Georgia stands higher in 8 of 15 fields, North Macedonia in 7. Georgia leads most in Medicine (#108 against #141); North Macedonia leads most in Computer Science (#79 against #122). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #92Agricultural and Biological Sciences#113
- #91Arts and Humanities#75
- #94Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#95
- #101Business, Management and Accounting#79
- #122Computer Science#79
- #59Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #69Economics, Econometrics and Finance#85
- #117Engineering#85
- #113Environmental Science#116
- #100Health Professions#97
- #78Mathematics-
- #108Medicine#141
- #54Physics and Astronomy-
- #93Psychology#90
- #106Social Sciences#103
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Georgia rank | North Macedonia rank | Georgia top 10% | North Macedonia top 10% | Georgia works | North Macedonia works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #92 | #113 | 1.9% | 4.6% | 1k | 358 |
| Arts and Humanities | #91 | #75 | 2.6% | 7.3% | 883 | 369 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #94 | #95 | 3.5% | 3.9% | 410 | 246 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #101 | #79 | 3.8% | 7.3% | 352 | 472 |
| Computer Science | #122 | #79 | 4.0% | 5.6% | 421 | 689 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #59 | - | 3.7% | - | 207 | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #69 | #85 | 6.6% | 6.3% | 846 | 489 |
| Engineering | #117 | #85 | 4.0% | 4.9% | 597 | 865 |
| Environmental Science | #113 | #116 | 5.0% | 5.1% | 366 | 324 |
| Health Professions | #100 | #97 | 3.5% | 4.8% | 209 | 233 |
| Mathematics | #78 | - | 3.2% | - | 251 | - |
| Medicine | #108 | #141 | 3.6% | 3.3% | 1.5k | 1.3k |
| Physics and Astronomy | #54 | - | 4.4% | - | 208 | - |
| Psychology | #93 | #90 | 2.8% | 7.5% | 283 | 245 |
| Social Sciences | #106 | #103 | 3.6% | 6.8% | 2.4k | 1.4k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Georgia
- Geopolitics
- Taxonomy
- Sovereignty
- Historical Phonology
- Political Economy
- Ethnobotanical Survey
- International Relations
- Drug Discovery
- Regional Development
- Herbal Medicine
- Language
- Antioxidant
- Human Rights
- Post-Communist Countries
- Education
- Human Capital
- Medicinal Plants
- Sustainable Development
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Globalization
- Economic Development
- Climate Change
- Labor Market
- Agriculture
- Financial Crisis
- Artificial Intelligence
- Trade Relations
- Migration
- Digital Transformation
- Linguistics
- Biogeography
- Phylogeny
- Economy
- Phytochemical Constituents
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- Etymology
- Russia
- Nation-Building
- Central Asia
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization1,176▲ 4.8×126 topics
- Innovation819▲ 6.4×66 topics
- Economic Development692▲ 7.0×45 topics
- Sustainability667▲ 2.2×104 topics
- Climate Change618▲ 1.83×109 topics
- Sustainable Development519▲ 2.7×90 topics
- Labor Market493▲ 14×17 topics
- Medicinal Plants472▲ 9.8×18 topics
- Agriculture471▲ 10.0×13 topics
- Human Capital441▲ 23×10 topics
- Financial Crisis412▲ 30×13 topics
- Education410▲ 1.92×94 topics
- Artificial Intelligence396▲ 2.2×51 topics
- Post-Communist Countries380▲ 199×1 topic
- Trade Relations380▲ 199×1 topic
- Human Rights355▲ 2.8×76 topics
- Migration318▲ 7.5×30 topics
- Antioxidant291▲ 3.4×50 topics
- Digital Transformation272▲ 4.1×27 topics
- Language269▲ 8.8×14 topics
- Linguistics247▲ 13×7 topics
- Herbal Medicine232▲ 6.7×13 topics
- Biogeography230▲ 6.7×20 topics
- Regional Development228▲ 5.4×19 topics
- Phylogeny225▲ 11×17 topics
- Drug Discovery205▲ 7.4×12 topics
- Economy197▲ 21×4 topics
- International Relations189▲ 6.3×28 topics
- Phytochemical Constituents188▲ 49×2 topics
- Ethnobotanical Survey187▲ 47×1 topic
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge187▲ 35×1 topic
- Political Economy180▲ 5.7×17 topics
- Etymology174▲ 30×2 topics
- Historical Phonology174▲ 30×2 topics
- Russia172▲ 33×3 topics
- Sovereignty170▲ 15×9 topics
- Nation-Building168▲ 25×4 topics
- Taxonomy162▲ 9.0×15 topics
- Central Asia159▲ 18×4 topics
- Geopolitics156▲ 8.3×11 topics
North Macedonia
- Leadership Emergence
- Yugoslavia
- Eastern Europe
- Innovation Management
- Fiscal Policy
- European Union
- Balkans
- Ethnicity
- Nationalism
- Financial Performance
- Security
- Supply Chain Management
- Big Data
- Identity
- Social Media
- Artificial Intelligence
- Economic Growth
- Deep Learning
- Sustainable Development
- Machine Learning
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Renewable Energy
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Healthcare
- Economic Development
- Energy Efficiency
- Social Capital
- Regional Development
- Religion
- Environmental Management
- Conflict
- Global Governance
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Geopolitics
- Post-war
- Rural Tourism
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization362▲ 2.0×138 topics
- Machine Learning343◆ 1.13×91 topics
- Sustainability335▲ 1.50×113 topics
- Sustainable Development292▲ 2.0×87 topics
- Epidemiology282▼ 0.78×135 topics
- Deep Learning269▼ 0.86×78 topics
- Climate Change267◆ 1.08×117 topics
- Economic Growth244▲ 3.3×33 topics
- Renewable Energy207▲ 1.57×55 topics
- Artificial Intelligence206▲ 1.58×54 topics
- Innovation175▲ 1.86×68 topics
- Social Media171▲ 1.36×38 topics
- Human Rights160▲ 1.72×75 topics
- Identity149▲ 2.3×58 topics
- Healthcare146▲ 1.41×36 topics
- Big Data144▲ 1.65×31 topics
- Economic Development142▲ 1.95×46 topics
- Supply Chain Management135▲ 1.65×25 topics
- Energy Efficiency132▲ 1.57×41 topics
- Security124▲ 2.0×26 topics
- Social Capital123▲ 2.6×19 topics
- Financial Performance119▲ 2.3×16 topics
- Regional Development116▲ 3.7×20 topics
- Nationalism115▲ 2.8×29 topics
- Religion108▲ 2.6×32 topics
- Ethnicity106▲ 3.1×21 topics
- Environmental Management95▲ 2.5×17 topics
- Balkans88▲ 42×2 topics
- Conflict82▲ 5.5×11 topics
- European Union79▲ 3.9×23 topics
- Global Governance79▲ 3.6×22 topics
- Fiscal Policy76▲ 4.1×10 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises72▲ 4.4×8 topics
- Innovation Management69▲ 4.9×10 topics
- Geopolitics68▲ 5.0×11 topics
- Eastern Europe64▲ 13×3 topics
- Post-war63▲ 59×1 topic
- Yugoslavia63▲ 59×1 topic
- Rural Tourism60▲ 21×3 topics
- Leadership Emergence59▲ 47×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Georgia has out-published North Macedonia every year since 2020, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0000
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Georgia or North Macedonia?
Georgia publishes 1.3× as much research as North Macedonia in 2022-now (11k against 7.9k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Georgia or North Macedonia?
5.5% of North Macedonia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 3.6% for Georgia.
Is Georgia or North Macedonia growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +81% against 2018-21 for Georgia, and +25% for North Macedonia.
Which has more open access research, Georgia or North Macedonia?
63% of North Macedonia's research is free to read, against 55% of Georgia's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Georgia or North Macedonia?
Georgia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and North Macedonia 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Georgia
- 1Ilia State University3.6% top 10% · 1.6k works
- 2Tbilisi State University3.4% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 3Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University4.5% top 10% · 649 works
- 4International Black Sea University6.3% top 10% · 261 works
- 5University of Georgia14.7% top 10% · 218 works
- 6Georgian Technical University2.1% top 10% · 1.1k works
North Macedonia
- 1MIT University9.5% top 10% · 1.5k works
- 2South East European University7.4% top 10% · 504 works
- 3Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts9.9% top 10% · 193 works
- 4Goce Delcev University2.8% top 10% · 684 works
- 5University "St. Kliment Ohridski" - Bitola5.2% top 10% · 505 works
- 6State University of Tetova4.9% top 10% · 350 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Georgia
- 1 F. Chlebana #33,051 worldwide 6k citations · 76 works
- 2 David Lordkipanidze #43,553 worldwide 8.8k citations · 168 works
- 3 J. Sturdy #43,642 worldwide 6.3k citations · 89 works
- 4 A. Petrilli #45,877 worldwide 3.4k citations · 55 works
- 5 K. Sung #50,952 worldwide 7.7k citations · 100 works
North Macedonia
- 1 Kimet Jusufi #21,685 worldwide 6.4k citations · 174 works
- 2 Biljana Gjoneska #24,126 worldwide 3.9k citations · 166 works
- 3 Veland Ramadani #65,215 worldwide 6.8k citations · 361 works
- 4 Gadaf Rexhepi #213,078 worldwide 1.8k citations · 101 works
- 5 Sasko A. Kedev #225,524 worldwide 22k citations · 299 works