Jiangsu University vs Linköping University
On research quality in 2022-now, Jiangsu University ranks #331 in the world and Linköping University #334, of 22,385 institutions. Jiangsu University stands higher in 7 of the 16 fields both publish in, Linköping University in 9.
Research profiles alike: -0.09different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other institutions
Jiangsu University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #331
- #651 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 19k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 18.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 32%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Analytical Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.
Linköping University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #334
- #384 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 6.5k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 13.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 47%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Applied Psychology, Toxicology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Jiangsu University leads on 5 of 8 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and growth. Linköping University leads on 3 of 8 measures: citations per work, open access and international co-authorship.
- #331Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#334
- 1.38×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.20×
- 19kOutputfractional works, 2022-now6.5k
- 18.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited13.4%
- 16.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work30.3
- 32%Open accessof its works free to read, all time47%
- 11%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time25%
- +50%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+3%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Jiangsu University stands higher in 7 of 16 fields, Linköping University in 9. Linköping University leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#172 against #295); Jiangsu University leads most in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#88 against #774). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #88Agricultural and Biological Sciences#774
- -Arts and Humanities#384
- #344Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#663
- #295Business, Management and Accounting#172
- #155Chemistry-
- #517Computer Science#423
- #329Economics, Econometrics and Finance#271
- #116Energy-
- #91Engineering#346
- #292Environmental Science#626
- -Health Professions#261
- #152Materials Science#167
- #730Medicine#337
- -Neuroscience#315
- -Psychology#280
- -Social Sciences#283
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Jiangsu University rank | Linköping University rank | Jiangsu University top 10% | Linköping University top 10% | Jiangsu University works | Linköping University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #88 | #774 | 30.6% | 12.3% | 1.1k | 85 |
| Arts and Humanities | - | #384 | - | 15.2% | - | 139 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #344 | #663 | 19.1% | 11.7% | 1.4k | 221 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #295 | #172 | 23.5% | 19.7% | 330 | 212 |
| Chemistry | #155 | - | 20.9% | - | 532 | - |
| Computer Science | #517 | #423 | 14.4% | 12.3% | 749 | 541 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #329 | #271 | 23.2% | 19.2% | 287 | 101 |
| Energy | #116 | - | 12.0% | - | 592 | - |
| Engineering | #91 | #346 | 18.9% | 12.2% | 5.6k | 861 |
| Environmental Science | #292 | #626 | 20.1% | 11.5% | 727 | 182 |
| Health Professions | - | #261 | - | 13.2% | - | 182 |
| Materials Science | #152 | #167 | 15.6% | 13.1% | 1.6k | 290 |
| Medicine | #730 | #337 | 16.7% | 14.9% | 1.8k | 1.2k |
| Neuroscience | - | #315 | - | 10.7% | - | 158 |
| Psychology | - | #280 | - | 13.3% | - | 371 |
| Social Sciences | - | #283 | - | 15.1% | - | 723 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Chemical Engineering4.0× 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.3× 0.3×
- Energy4.0× 1.0×
- Chemistry2.0× 0.6×
- Nursing1.5× 0.6×
- Engineering2.2× 1.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.6× 0.7×
- Materials Science2.8× 1.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.0× 0.7×
- Environmental Science0.9× 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.2× 0.9×
- Physics and Astronomy0.9× 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.8× 0.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.3× 0.3×
- Mathematics0.7× 1.2×
- Medicine0.6× 1.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.6× 1.1×
- Computer Science0.6× 1.2×
- Dentistry0.2× 0.4×
- Decision Sciences0.6× 1.5×
- Neuroscience0.6× 1.7×
- Health Professions0.2× 1.2×
- Veterinary0.2× 1.2×
- Social Sciences0.1× 1.0×
- Psychology0.2× 2.1×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.8×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Jiangsu University leans further are at the top, Linköping University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Jiangsu University
- Turbulent Flow
- Fluid-Structure Interaction
- Electrochemistry
- Catalysts
- Plasmonic
- Numerical Simulation
- Rechargeable Batteries
- Nanostructures
- Hydrogen Production
- Electrocatalysis
- Biosensors
- Drug Delivery
- Microstructure
- Cathode Materials
- Metal-Organic Frameworks
- Energy Storage
- Cancer
- Graphene
- Biomedical Applications
- Deep Learning
- Nanomaterials
- Nanoparticles
- Mechanical Properties
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Water Splitting
- Catalysis
- Nanocomposites
- Semiconductor
- CO2 Reduction
- Heat Transfer
- Lithium-ion Batteries
- Visible Light
- Solar Energy
- Electric Vehicles
- Photocatalyst
- Carbon Nanotubes
- Model Predictive Control
- Energy Conversion
- Control Systems
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Nanomaterials901▲ 4.6×20 topics
- Deep Learning712◆ 1.09×84 topics
- Nanoparticles699▲ 2.9×44 topics
- Biomedical Applications697▲ 3.1×36 topics
- Mechanical Properties652▲ 3.5×38 topics
- Graphene632▲ 5.0×11 topics
- Machine Learning597◆ 0.95×86 topics
- Cancer560▲ 2.2×59 topics
- Inflammation524▲ 1.30×83 topics
- Energy Storage504▲ 4.1×12 topics
- Water Splitting477▲ 6.8×4 topics
- Metal-Organic Frameworks459▲ 5.8×6 topics
- Catalysis455▲ 3.6×27 topics
- Cathode Materials391▲ 5.3×3 topics
- Nanocomposites383▲ 2.6×21 topics
- Microstructure380▲ 3.9×19 topics
- Semiconductor308▲ 5.0×7 topics
- Drug Delivery308▲ 3.0×16 topics
- CO2 Reduction306▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Biosensors303▲ 3.3×12 topics
- Heat Transfer302▲ 3.3×20 topics
- Electrocatalysis302▲ 5.6×5 topics
- Lithium-ion Batteries299▲ 3.8×4 topics
- Hydrogen Production296▲ 5.8×5 topics
- Visible Light295▲ 6.7×3 topics
- Nanostructures287▲ 3.7×17 topics
- Solar Energy287▲ 4.8×5 topics
- Rechargeable Batteries283▲ 5.6×2 topics
- Electric Vehicles279▲ 5.1×4 topics
- Numerical Simulation260▲ 4.7×14 topics
- Photocatalyst254▲ 7.8×1 topic
- Plasmonic254▲ 7.8×1 topic
- Carbon Nanotubes252▲ 4.0×8 topics
- Catalysts240▲ 6.3×3 topics
- Model Predictive Control237▲ 4.9×6 topics
- Electrochemistry230▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Energy Conversion223▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Fluid-Structure Interaction203▲ 7.2×6 topics
- Control Systems203▲ 5.9×11 topics
- Turbulent Flow176▲ 7.8×4 topics
Linköping University
- Policy Mixes
- Sustainability Transitions
- PEDOT:PSS
- Language Development
- Light-Emitting Diodes
- Organic Electronics
- Methodology
- Two-Dimensional Materials
- Social Sciences
- Learning
- Special Education
- Anxiety
- Biomedical Applications
- Nanocomposites
- Qualitative Research
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Education
- Quality of Life
- Sustainability
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Inflammation
- Mental Health
- Renewable Energy
- Depression
- Energy Efficiency
- Big Data
- Risk Factors
- Pedagogy
- Resilience
- Discourse Analysis
- Semiconductors
- Gender Studies
- Quantitative Methods
- Nanofibers
- Field-Effect Transistors
- Conducting Polymers
- Polyaniline
- Adaptive Governance
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology286◆ 1.11×126 topics
- Machine Learning216◆ 1.00×81 topics
- Deep Learning198◆ 0.89×75 topics
- Sustainability155◆ 0.98×77 topics
- Inflammation146◆ 1.06×80 topics
- Quality of Life132▲ 1.41×55 topics
- Mental Health130▲ 1.40×39 topics
- Education125◆ 1.13×61 topics
- Renewable Energy119▲ 1.27×41 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease112▲ 1.51×35 topics
- Depression111▲ 1.96×21 topics
- Qualitative Research108▲ 1.95×20 topics
- Energy Efficiency98▲ 1.64×33 topics
- Nanocomposites97▲ 1.89×22 topics
- Big Data93▲ 1.51×25 topics
- Biomedical Applications92▲ 1.20×31 topics
- Risk Factors89▲ 1.25×35 topics
- Anxiety78▲ 2.5×11 topics
- Pedagogy73▲ 2.2×13 topics
- Special Education71▲ 18×5 topics
- Resilience69▲ 2.2×14 topics
- Learning69▲ 3.6×8 topics
- Discourse Analysis68▲ 4.3×7 topics
- Social Sciences67▲ 7.2×6 topics
- Semiconductors66▲ 3.5×5 topics
- Two-Dimensional Materials63▲ 4.2×4 topics
- Gender Studies62▲ 6.2×9 topics
- Methodology59▲ 19×2 topics
- Quantitative Methods58▲ 69×1 topic
- Organic Electronics52▲ 6.0×2 topics
- Nanofibers49▲ 3.7×3 topics
- Light-Emitting Diodes48▲ 5.0×2 topics
- Field-Effect Transistors47▲ 4.7×4 topics
- Language Development46▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Conducting Polymers45▲ 5.3×2 topics
- PEDOT:PSS45▲ 6.2×1 topic
- Polyaniline45▲ 6.2×1 topic
- Sustainability Transitions34▲ 16×2 topics
- Adaptive Governance33▲ 17×1 topic
- Policy Mixes33▲ 17×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Jiangsu University has out-published Linköping University every year since 2006, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Jiangsu University or Linköping University?
Jiangsu University publishes 2.9× as much research as Linköping University in 2022-now (19k against 6.5k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Jiangsu University or Linköping University?
18.2% of Jiangsu University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 13.4% for Linköping University.
Is Jiangsu University or Linköping University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +50% against 2018-21 for Jiangsu University, and +3% for Linköping University.
Which has more open access research, Jiangsu University or Linköping University?
47% of Linköping University's research is free to read, against 32% of Jiangsu University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Jiangsu University
- 1 Fakhar Shahzad #12,855 worldwide 4.2k citations · 94 works
- 2 Xu Zhang #22,211 worldwide 18k citations · 257 works
- 3 Weikang Wang #26,977 worldwide 8.7k citations · 136 works
- 4 Xiaobo Zou #27,764 worldwide 22k citations · 522 works
- 5 Sikandar Ali Qalati #28,305 worldwide 4.4k citations · 112 works
Linköping University
- 1 Gazi Salah Uddin #6,530 worldwide 12k citations · 373 works
- 2 Sai Bai #8,418 worldwide 18k citations · 140 works
- 3 Joseph Halim #14,485 worldwide 22k citations · 124 works
- 4 Abdelazim G. Hussien #17,527 worldwide 6.4k citations · 134 works
- 5 Olle Inganäs #21,323 worldwide 60k citations · 675 works