Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Princeton Meadows · United States

Artistic Realization Technologies

In research, Artistic Realization Technologies stands highest in Medicine (#3,539 of 10,443 worldwide), Health Sciences (#4,432 of 11,982 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,138 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy and History — Visual Arts and Performing Arts is 24.3× its share of world research.

artrealization.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#11,276
of 28,054 · #10,588 all time
Rank in United States
#1,534
of 4,192
Research works
3.6k
▲ 35% vs 2013–17
Citations
17k
4.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
57%
world 28%

What is Artistic Realization Technologies known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
MedicineField #3,539 of 10,443 11.4%169 #4659
Health SciencesDomain #4,432 of 11,982 10.4%206 #4533
Social SciencesDomain #5,138 of 10,521 7.6%508 #3499
Social SciencesField #4,659 of 6,365 6.0%228 #3715
Arts and HumanitiesField #1,470 of 1,998 9.4%196 #988
Physical SciencesDomain #10,484 of 12,888 5.7%99 #9841
Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield #2,451 of 2,578 3.9%83 #2933

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Artistic Realization Technologies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Medicine#4,659 #3,539
  2. Health Sciences#4,533 #4,432
  3. Social Sciences#3,499 #5,138
  4. Social Sciences#3,715 #4,659
  5. Arts and Humanities#988 #1,470
  6. Physical Sciences#9,841 #10,484
  7. Sociology and Political Science#2,933 #2,451
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Artistic Realization Technologies specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Visual Arts and Performing Arts takes 24.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Visual Arts and Performing ArtsSubfield · 34.1 works24×
  2. PhilosophySubfield · 36.3 works9.9×
  3. HistorySubfield · 23.8 works8.7×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.36× its world share, 15 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.26× its world share, 12 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.33× its world share, 3 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.71× its world share, 10 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.14× its world share, 2 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.63× its world share, 42 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.40× its world share, 5 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.21× its world share, 2 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.17× its world share, 22 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.48× its world share, 20 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.05× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.19× its world share, 2 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.15× its world share, 3 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.52× its world share, 2 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.48× its world share, 33 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.03× its world share, 169 worksMedicineNursing: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksNursingVeterinary: 1.03× its world share, 1 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 7.97× its world share, 196 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.46× its world share, 13 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.69× its world share, 6 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.81× its world share, 15 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.94× its world share, 50 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.11× its world share, 228 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 8.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Artistic Realization Technologies?

Ranked on the composite score, John Walker, Delphine Veaudor and Laurent Bury lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Artistic Realization Technologies.

  1. 1 John Walker · #190,007 worldwide 168 citations · 103 works
  2. 2 Delphine Veaudor · #408,614 worldwide 0 citations · 24 works
  3. 3 Laurent Bury · #491,454 worldwide 3 citations · 48 works
  4. 4 Hermann Grapow · #543,733 worldwide 5 citations · 19 works
  5. 5 Laurence Debecque-Michel · #751,801 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
  6. 6 Tim Parks · #756,233 worldwide 0 citations · 18 works
  7. 7 Ryan MacLean · #1,102,441 worldwide 0 citations · 51 works
All ranked researchers at Artistic Realization Technologies

Which keywords describe research at Artistic Realization Technologies?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Social Justice, Globalization, Cultural Heritage, Identity, Religion, Education, History and Cultural Studies.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization59▲ 3.5×75 topics
  2. Social Justice52▲ 10×28 topics
  3. Education48▲ 3.3×79 topics
  4. Identity40▲ 6.5×46 topics
  5. Cultural Heritage38▲ 8.2×33 topics
  6. Religion37▲ 9.1×24 topics
  7. Epidemiology36◆ 1.07×92 topics
  8. History35▲ 5.9×41 topics
  9. Sustainable Development34▲ 2.5×40 topics
  10. Quality of Life30▲ 2.4×49 topics
  11. Cultural Studies29▲ 9.1×27 topics
  12. Gender28▲ 6.1×31 topics
  13. Ethics27▲ 6.5×24 topics
  14. Community Engagement26▲ 9.4×16 topics
  15. Innovation26▲ 3.0×35 topics
  16. Public Health26▲ 2.1×37 topics
  17. Public Policy26▲ 6.1×19 topics
  18. Colonialism24▲ 6.0×29 topics
  19. Culture23▲ 5.0×25 topics
  20. Literature22▲ 4.8×35 topics
  21. Social Media22▲ 1.80×26 topics
  22. Philosophy19▲ 5.1×24 topics
  23. Neuroscience18▲ 7.0×13 topics
  24. Feminism18▲ 7.3×13 topics
  25. Spirituality18▲ 21×7 topics
  26. Cultural Identity17▲ 3.8×21 topics
  27. Memory15▲ 7.3×17 topics
  28. Territorial Governance15▲ 14×3 topics
  29. Citizen Participation15▲ 14×3 topics
  30. Local Development15▲ 15×2 topics
  31. Nationalism15▲ 3.7×19 topics
  32. Environmental Participation14▲ 21×1 topic
  33. Proximity and Innovation14▲ 21×1 topic
  34. Race14▲ 15×11 topics
  35. Politics14▲ 6.0×15 topics
  36. Ethnography12▲ 8.3×12 topics
  37. Psychology12▲ 11×7 topics
  38. Intersectionality11▲ 7.1×8 topics
  39. Social Change11▲ 10×11 topics
  40. Cultural Politics11▲ 19×6 topics

Which research topics does Artistic Realization Technologies publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: French Urban and Social Studies, Theological Perspectives and Practices, Karl Barth and Christian Theology and Art, Politics, and Modernism.

French Urban and Social …14French Urban and Social Studies: 14 fractional worksTheological Perspectives and Practices: 9 fractional worksKarl Barth and Christian Theology: 7 fractional worksArt, Politics, and Modernism: 6 fractional worksMedia, Religion, Digital Communication: 6 fractional worksCatholicism and Religious Studies: 5 fractional worksCultural Insights and Di…5Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts: 5 fractional worksDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies: 5 fractional worksCultural Identity and Heritage: 5 fractional worksPentecostalism and Chris…5Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies: 5 fractional works
Sociology and Political SciencePhilosophyVisual Arts and Performing ArtsHistory4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 French Urban and Social StudiesSociology and Political Science 14 works
  2. 2 Theological Perspectives and PracticesSociology and Political Science 9 works
  3. 3 Karl Barth and Christian TheologyPhilosophy 7 works
  4. 4 Art, Politics, and ModernismVisual Arts and Performing Arts 6 works
  5. 5 Media, Religion, Digital CommunicationPhilosophy 6 works
  6. 6 Catholicism and Religious StudiesHistory 5 works
  7. 7 Cultural Insights and Digital ImpactsComputer Networks and Communications 5 works
  8. 8 Diverse Cultural and Historical StudiesCultural Studies 5 works
  9. 9 Cultural Identity and HeritageArcheology 5 works
  10. 10 Pentecostalism and Christianity StudiesReligious studies 5 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available57.2%not open42.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors34.8%domestic only65.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Artistic Realization Technologies's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 35% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Princeton Meadows

All research institutions in Princeton Meadows

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.