Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Theological Perspectives and Practices

Theological Perspectives and Practices is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 4.8k research works in it since 1950. 12.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the intersection of Black liberation theology, race, feminism, and social justice. It delves into the impact of religion on African-American communities, addressing oppression, intersectionality, and practical theology in the context of gender and social inequality.

  • Black Liberation Theology
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Social Justice
  • Feminism
  • Oppression
  • Intersectionality
  • Practical Theology
  • African-American
  • Gender
Research works
4.8k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
586
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+29%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Theological Perspectives and Practices research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (419 and 119 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 419 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 119 works
  3. 3 South Africa 58 works
  4. 4 Canada 33 works
  5. 5 Australia 32 works
  6. 6 Netherlands 17 works
  7. 7 Germany 17 works
  8. 8 Indonesia 13 works
  9. 9 Norway 10 works
  10. 10 India 10 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 57.6%United Kingdom: 16.4%South Africa: 8.0%Canada: 4.5%6 others listed: 13.4%58%largest
United States419 · 57.6%United Kingdom119 · 16.4%South Africa58 · 8.0%Canada33 · 4.5%6 others listed98 · 13.4%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Theological Perspectives and Practices research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of South Africa publishes the most Theological Perspectives and Practices research, followed by Andrews University and Stellenbosch University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of South Africa South Africa 17 works
  2. 2 Andrews University United States 11 works
  3. 3 Stellenbosch University South Africa 10 works
  4. 4 Artistic Realization Technologies United States 9 works
  5. 5 Boston College United States 9 works
  6. 6 University of Oxford United Kingdom 8 works
  7. 7 University of Chicago United States 8 works
  8. 8 University of Aberdeen United Kingdom 8 works
  9. 9 Princeton Theological Seminary United States 7 works
  10. 10 Emory University United States 7 works

Who are the leading researchers in Theological Perspectives and Practices?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Theological Perspectives and Practices include Leslie J. Francis.

  1. 1 Leslie J. Francis 781 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Theological Perspectives and Practices research done?

The largest centres of Theological Perspectives and Practices research in 2022–2025 are Pretoria (South Africa), New York (United States), London (United Kingdom) and Chicago (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Pretoria.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Pretoria South Africa 24 works
  2. 2 New York United States 21 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 17 works
  4. 4 Chicago United States 16 works
  5. 5 Boston United States 15 works
  6. 6 Oxford United Kingdom 12 works
  7. 7 Berrien Springs United States 11 works
  8. 8 Stellenbosch South Africa 10 works
  9. 9 Atlanta United States 10 works
  10. 10 Washington D.C. United States 10 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PretoriaZA · 23.9 works23×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Theological Perspectives and Practices than the world average.

See Theological Perspectives and Practices on the map

Where is the best place to study Theological Perspectives and Practices?

Among universities, judged by research, University of South Africa, Stellenbosch University and University of Aberdeen score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 11.3714%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of South Africa: 17, 24.0%Stellenbosch University: 10, 16.0%University of Aberdeen: 8, 8.2%Andrews University: 11, 7.4%University of Chicago: 8, 12.1%Boston College: 8, 2.0%University of Oxford: 8, 9.9%University of South …Stellenbosch Univers…University of AberdeenAndrews University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1University of South Africa South Africa 91.224.0%45.2×17 +81.0%
2Stellenbosch University South Africa 62.116.0%32.8×10 +9.1%
3University of Aberdeen United Kingdom 52.48.2%49.1×8 +34.9%
4Andrews University United States 50.87.4%462.8×11 +23.1%
5University of Chicago United States 40.512.1%12.2×8 -38.9%
6Boston College United States 31.92.0%65.5×8 -15.2%
7University of Oxford United Kingdom 24.09.9%7.9×8 -17.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Theological Perspectives and Practices research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 29% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Theological Perspectives and Practices.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.