Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Rivière-du-Loup · Canada

Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup

cegeprdl.caROR OpenAlex
Research works
58
▲ 87% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.7k
47.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
14.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
62%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%
Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup

Not ranked overall: Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup work in?

In all years, 35% of research at Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup is in Social Sciences, 27% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (18%), Medicine (17%), Social Sciences (16%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Social Sciences: 20 fractional works · 35.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 10 fractional works · 16.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 6 fractional works · 10.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 8 fractional works · 14.7% of its workArcheology: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 3 fractional works · 4.6% of its workHistory: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 16 fractional works · 26.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 10 fractional works · 17.9% of its workPlant Science: 6 fractional works · 9.8% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workSoil Science: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5 fractional works · 8.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 13 fractional works · 22.1% of its workMedicine: 10 fractional works · 17.4% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhysical Sciences: 9 fractional works · 15.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 7.2% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 5.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKCégep deRivière-du-Loup58fractional works, all years
Life Sciences27%Physical Sciences16%Health Sciences22%Social Sciences35%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1016.4%
    2. Arts and Humanities814.7%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting11.8%
    4. Decision Sciences11.1%
    5. Psychology11.0%
    6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.4%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1017.9%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology58.4%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    4. Neuroscience00.1%
    1. Medicine1017.4%
    2. Health Professions23.0%
    3. Nursing11.8%
    1. Environmental Science47.2%
    2. Engineering35.4%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.8%
    4. Chemical Engineering00.5%
    5. Computer Science00.3%
    6. Chemistry00.2%
    7. Materials Science00.2%
    8. Mathematics00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.45× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3.80× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.44× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Chemistry: 0.63× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.56× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.70× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.96× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.28× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.36× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.62× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.18× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 18.03× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.77× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.81× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 18.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 16 fields, with their numbers
  1. Nursing18.03×1 works
  2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology3.80×2 works
  3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.45×1 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology2.44×0 works
  5. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.56×0 works
  6. Medicine1.18×3 works
  7. Business, Management and Accounting1.10×0 works
  8. Environmental Science0.96×0 works
  9. Psychology0.81×0 works
  10. Arts and Humanities0.77×0 works
  11. Engineering0.70×1 works
  12. Chemistry0.63×0 works
  13. Health Professions0.62×0 works
  14. Mathematics0.36×0 works
  15. Social Sciences0.32×0 works
  16. Materials Science0.28×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup?

Ranked on the quality score, Peter Moutoglis, Christian Allen Drouin and Habib Horchani lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup.

  1. 1 Peter Moutoglis Canada · #1,314,430 worldwide 5.7k citations · 24 works
  2. 2 Christian Allen Drouin Canada · #1,432,931 worldwide 839 citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Habib Horchani Canada · #3,764,669 worldwide 892 citations · 45 works
  4. 4 P. Aversenq Canada · #4,403,357 worldwide 5 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup

What are the most cited papers from Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup?

The most cited paper from Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup is "Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity" (Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, John N. Klironomos, Margot Ursic et al., 1998), with 3,587 citations. Next come "Methods of studying soil microbial diversity" (920) and "Bacterial-Mediated Induced Resistance in Cucumber: Beneficial Effect of the Endophytic Bacterium Serratia plymuthica on the Protection Against Infection by Pythium ultimum" (206).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, John N. Klironomos, Margot Ursic et al. · Nature Open access Nov 1998 3,587
2 Methods of studying soil microbial diversity Jennifer L. Kirk, Lee A. Beaudette, Miranda M. Hart et al. · Journal of Microbiological Methods 17 Jun 2004 920
3 Bacterial-Mediated Induced Resistance in Cucumber: Beneficial Effect of the Endophytic Bacterium Serratia plymuthica on the Protection Against Infection by Pythium ultimum Nicole Benhamou, Serge Gagné, Dominique Le Quéré et al. · Phytopathology Open access 2000 206
4 FOR HOW LONG MUST THE SOLEUS MUSCLE BE STRETCHED EACH DAY TO PREVENT CONTRACTURE? C Tardieu, Alain Lespargot, Chantal Tabary et al. · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology Feb 1988 202
5 Flavonoid levels in roots ofMedicago sativa are modulated by the developmental stage of the symbiosis and the root colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Geneviève Larose, Robert Chênevert, Peter Moutoglis et al. · Journal of Plant Physiology 2002 192
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Community Engagement, Territorial Governance, Public Policy, Citizen Participation, Sustainable Development, Social Justice, Environmental Participation and Proximity and Innovation.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Community Engagement4▲ 24×2 topics
  2. Territorial Governance4▲ 51×2 topics
  3. Sustainable Development4▲ 6.2×4 topics
  4. Public Policy4▲ 15×2 topics
  5. Citizen Participation4▲ 56×2 topics
  6. Social Justice4▲ 12×2 topics
  7. Environmental Participation4▲ 66×1 topic
  8. Proximity and Innovation4▲ 66×1 topic
  9. Innovation3▲ 6.3×4 topics
  10. Climate Change3▲ 2.1×13 topics
  11. Ecosystem Functioning3▲ 27×5 topics
  12. Colonialism3▲ 11×5 topics
  13. Sustainability3▲ 2.8×5 topics
  14. Nutrient Cycling3▲ 61×2 topics
  15. Identity3▲ 5.9×4 topics
  16. Scientific History3▲ 91×1 topic
  17. Technological Development3▲ 91×1 topic
  18. Gender2▲ 7.5×4 topics
  19. Globalization2▲ 2.4×5 topics
  20. Mycorrhizal Fungi2▲ 59×2 topics
  21. Nationalism2▲ 7.4×3 topics
  22. DNA Barcoding2▲ 25×2 topics
  23. Fungal Diversity2▲ 93×1 topic
  24. Plant Interactions2▲ 102×1 topic
  25. Religion2▲ 6.4×3 topics
  26. Memory2▲ 14×2 topics
  27. Diversity2▲ 15×3 topics
  28. Antioxidant Activity2▲ 4.8×7 topics
  29. Gender Studies2▲ 17×3 topics
  30. Microbiome2▲ 18×3 topics
  31. Phylogenetic Analysis1▲ 6.5×5 topics
  32. Plant Immunity1▲ 26×1 topic
  33. Rhizosphere Interactions1▲ 32×1 topic
  34. Adaptation1▲ 7.8×1 topic
  35. Livestock Farming1▲ 42×1 topic
  36. Host Specificity1▲ 16×2 topics
  37. Tourism1▲ 26×2 topics
  38. Composting1▲ 37×1 topic
  39. Heritage1▲ 57×1 topic
  40. Maturity Assessment1▲ 57×1 topic

Which research topics does Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Child Nutrition and Water Access, Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments, Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization and Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production.

Child Nutrition and Wate…1Child Nutrition and Water Access: 1 fractional worksGastrointestinal disorde…0Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments: 0 fractional worksEnzyme Catalysis and Imm…0Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization: 0 fractional worksAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production: 0 fractional worksBiofuel production and bioconversion: 0 fractional worksMicrobial Metabolic Engi…0Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction: 0 fractional worksBioenergy crop production and management: 0 fractional worksBiodiesel Production and Applications: 0 fractional worksAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases: 0 fractional worksVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies: 0 fractional works
Nutrition and DieteticsSurgeryMolecular BiologyBuilding and Construction4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Child Nutrition and Water Access Nutrition and Dietetics 1 works
  2. 2 Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments Surgery 0 works
  3. 3 Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization Molecular Biology 0 works
  4. 4 Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production Building and Construction 0 works
  5. 5 Biofuel production and bioconversion Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction Molecular Biology 0 works
  7. 7 Bioenergy crop production and management Agronomy and Crop Science 0 works
  8. 8 Biodiesel Production and Applications Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
  10. 10 Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies Genetics 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available61.7%not open38.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors23.2%domestic only76.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 87% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000044% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup0.000060% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Rivière-du-Loup

All research institutions in Rivière-du-Loup

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cégep de Rivière-du-Loup. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.