Center for Inquiry
In research, Center for Inquiry stands highest in Social Sciences (#3,967 of 16,945 worldwide), Social Sciences (#2,507 of 10,206 worldwide) and Education (#1,258 of 3,044 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #11,833 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #2,599 of 8,685
- Research works
- 1.4k ▼ 10% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 12k 9.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 13% world 28%
What is Center for Inquiry known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #3,967 of 16,945 | 14.6% | 980 | |
| Social SciencesField | #2,507 of 10,206 | 16.6% | 613 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,258 of 3,044 | 17.9% | 299 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #8,891 of 20,462 | 13.4% | 135 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #12,487 of 21,541 | 13.8% | 176 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #3,104 of 4,340 | 13.9% | 124 | |
| PsychologyField | #3,539 of 3,744 | 6.6% | 165 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Inquiry sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 2.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Social Sciences 2.8×
- Nursing 2.7×
- Health Professions 2.4×
- Arts and Humanities 2.4×
- Decision Sciences 1.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.8×
- Psychology 1.8×
- Computer Science 1.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Mathematics 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.6×
- Veterinary 0.5×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Center for Inquiry?
Ranked on the composite score, Susan L. Robertson, Ruth Deakin Crick and PM Broadfoot lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Inquiry.
- 1 Susan L. Robertson United States · #30,665 worldwide 301 citations · 78 works
- 2 Ruth Deakin Crick United States · #107,044 worldwide 188 citations · 29 works
- 3 PM Broadfoot United States · #140,374 worldwide 66 citations · 35 works
- 4 Frances Giampapa United States · #359,151 worldwide 85 citations · 19 works
- 5 F Olivero United States · #674,315 worldwide 21 citations · 23 works
- 6 JC Winter United States · #848,302 worldwide 8 citations · 17 works
- 7 Laurinda C Brown United States · #887,427 worldwide 35 citations · 56 works
- 8 Tim Bond United States · #894,373 worldwide 10 citations · 23 works
- 9 MJ Osborn United States · #973,663 worldwide 16 citations · 29 works
- 10 Alf Coles United States · #982,224 worldwide 47 citations · 59 works
Which keywords describe research at Center for Inquiry?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Social Capital, Entrepreneurship, Child Development, Social Justice, Online Learning, Urban Development and Maternal Mortality.
- Educational Technology
- Creative Economy
- COVID-19
- Community Empowerment
- Semantic Web
- Outcome-Based Education
- Neoliberalism
- Community Health Workers
- School Engagement
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Innovation
- Urban Development
- Mental Health
- Lifelong Learning
- Curriculum Development
- Public Health
- Online Learning
- Social Capital
- Globalization
- Entrepreneurship
- Child Development
- Social Justice
- Gender
- Maternal Mortality
- Student Engagement
- Assessment Methods
- Healthcare
- Self-Regulation
- Knowledge Representation
- Student-Teacher Relationships
- Engineering Education
- Ontology
- Qualitative Research
- Social Media
- Education
- Colonialism
- Cultural Policy
- Evidence-Based Practice
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 39 words, with their numbers
- Globalization4▲ 4.4×15 topics
- Social Capital2▲ 7.9×4 topics
- Entrepreneurship2▲ 10×4 topics
- Online Learning2▲ 4.8×6 topics
- Child Development2▲ 9.2×5 topics
- Public Health2▲ 2.6×7 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 6.3×6 topics
- Curriculum Development2▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Gender2▲ 5.5×8 topics
- Lifelong Learning2▲ 15×4 topics
- Maternal Mortality2▲ 14×3 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 2.1×12 topics
- Student Engagement2▲ 7.4×4 topics
- Urban Development2▲ 8.4×4 topics
- Assessment Methods2▲ 26×2 topics
- Innovation2▲ 2.8×8 topics
- Healthcare1▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Machine Learning1▼ 0.80×4 topics
- Self-Regulation1▲ 15×2 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1▲ 1.86×7 topics
- Knowledge Representation1▲ 29×2 topics
- School Engagement1▲ 55×1 topic
- Student-Teacher Relationships1▲ 55×1 topic
- Community Health Workers1▲ 28×2 topics
- Engineering Education1▲ 25×1 topic
- Neoliberalism1▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Ontology1▲ 28×1 topic
- Outcome-Based Education1▲ 85×1 topic
- Qualitative Research1▲ 2.7×4 topics
- Semantic Web1▲ 24×1 topic
- Social Media1▲ 1.60×4 topics
- Community Empowerment1▲ 2.7×5 topics
- Education1▲ 1.27×7 topics
- COVID-191▲ 1.40×6 topics
- Colonialism1▲ 4.0×4 topics
- Creative Economy1▲ 54×1 topic
- Cultural Policy1▲ 47×1 topic
- Educational Technology1▲ 1.66×5 topics
- Evidence-Based Practice1▲ 15×3 topics
Which research topics does Center for Inquiry publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Early Childhood Education and Development, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Engineering Education and Curriculum Development and Cultural Industries and Urban Development.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Early Childhood Education and Development Education 1 works
- 2 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 3 Engineering Education and Curriculum Development Media Technology 1 works
- 4 Cultural Industries and Urban Development Urban Studies 1 works
- 5 Urban Green Space and Health Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1 works
- 6 Online Learning and Analytics Computer Science Applications 1 works
- 7 Surgical site infection prevention Surgery 1 works
- 8 Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis Epidemiology 1 works
- 9 Hearing Impairment and Communication Developmental and Educational Psychology 1 works
- 10 Neonatal and Maternal Infections Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Center for Inquiry's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 10% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Buffalo
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Buffalo State University
- Canisius College
- Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo
- Jacobs Institute
- Buffalo General Medical Center
- D'Youville College
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.