Center for Practical Bioethics
In research, Center for Practical Bioethics stands highest in Health Sciences (#9,357 of 20,462 worldwide) and Medicine (#8,785 of 17,978 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #21,397 of 28,054 · #28,555 all time
- Rank in United States
- #3,153 of 4,192
- Research works
- 402 ▲ 85% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 6.2k 15.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 17.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 31% world 28%
What is Center for Practical Bioethics known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,357 of 20,462 | 21.4% | 267 | |
| MedicineField | #8,785 of 17,978 | 19.1% | 164 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Practical Bioethics sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 10.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 10.1×
- Veterinary 5.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.9×
- Medicine 1.8×
- Neuroscience 1.6×
- Decision Sciences 1.5×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Psychology 1.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.0×
- Engineering 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Center for Practical Bioethics?
Ranked on the composite score, Jérôme Béranger and Carl Elliott lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Practical Bioethics.
- 1 Jérôme Béranger United States · #373,340 worldwide 0 citations · 28 works
- 2 Carl Elliott United States · #460,860 worldwide 29 citations · 25 works
Which keywords describe research at Center for Practical Bioethics?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Medical Ethics, Palliative Care, End-of-Life Care, Clinical Trials, Public Health Policy, Mental Health, Healthcare Legislation and Patient Rights.
- Patient Engagement
- Clinical Decision Support
- Health Care Costs
- Ethical Issues
- Parental Discretion
- Health Utility Measures
- Research Participation
- Minority Recruitment
- Burnout
- Social Determinants of Health
- Healthcare Policy
- Community Engagement
- Ethical Guidelines
- Artificial Intelligence
- Healthcare
- Patient Rights
- Public Health Policy
- Clinical Trials
- Quality of Life
- Palliative Care
- Medical Ethics
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- End-of-Life Care
- Healthcare Legislation
- Machine Learning
- Informed Consent
- Big Data
- Primary Care
- Ethics
- Inequalities
- Universal Health Coverage
- Ethical Climate
- Moral Distress
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Ethical Considerations
- Pediatric
- Precision Medicine
- Health Equity
- Quality Improvement
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Medical Ethics8▲ 93×5 topics
- Palliative Care6▲ 57×3 topics
- Mental Health6▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Quality of Life5▲ 5.5×14 topics
- Public Health5▲ 5.3×17 topics
- Clinical Trials5▲ 11×4 topics
- End-of-Life Care5▲ 63×3 topics
- Public Health Policy5▲ 26×2 topics
- Healthcare Legislation4▲ 114×1 topic
- Patient Rights4▲ 93×1 topic
- Machine Learning4▲ 1.77×5 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Informed Consent3▲ 68×3 topics
- Artificial Intelligence3▲ 3.6×3 topics
- Big Data3▲ 5.4×3 topics
- Ethical Guidelines3▲ 87×3 topics
- Primary Care3▲ 13×5 topics
- Community Engagement3▲ 13×3 topics
- Ethics3▲ 9.1×9 topics
- Healthcare Policy3▲ 46×2 topics
- Inequalities3▲ 121×1 topic
- Social Determinants of Health3▲ 19×2 topics
- Universal Health Coverage3▲ 121×1 topic
- Burnout3▲ 46×2 topics
- Ethical Climate3▲ 138×1 topic
- Minority Recruitment3▲ 160×1 topic
- Moral Distress3▲ 138×1 topic
- Research Participation3▲ 160×1 topic
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis3▲ 47×1 topic
- Health Utility Measures3▲ 47×1 topic
- Ethical Considerations2▲ 11×10 topics
- Parental Discretion2▲ 203×1 topic
- Pediatric2▲ 63×1 topic
- Ethical Issues2▲ 33×3 topics
- Precision Medicine2▲ 7.7×2 topics
- Health Care Costs2▲ 40×2 topics
- Health Equity2▲ 12×3 topics
- Clinical Decision Support2▲ 22×1 topic
- Quality Improvement2▲ 16×4 topics
- Patient Engagement2▲ 21×4 topics
Which research topics does Center for Practical Bioethics publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Health, Medicine and Society, Healthcare Systems and Practices, Ethics in Clinical Research and Ethics in medical practice.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 4 works
- 2 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 3 works
- 3 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3 works
- 4 Ethics in medical practice General Health Professions 3 works
- 5 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 6 Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2 works
- 7 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 2 works
- 8 Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Physiology 2 works
- 9 Healthcare cost, quality, practices General Health Professions 2 works
- 10 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Center for Practical Bioethics's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 85% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Kansas City
- University of Missouri–Kansas City
- Children's Mercy Hospital
- Saint Luke's Hospital
- MRIGlobal
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research
- Kansas City University
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center
- Truman Medical Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.