Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Government institution · Viborg · Denmark

Central Denmark Region

In research, Central Denmark Region stands highest in Health Sciences (#2,044 of 9,902 worldwide) and Medicine (#2,077 of 8,541 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in General Health Professions (General Health Professions is 7.3× its share of world research).

rm.dkROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#8,952
of 22,385 · #7,169 all time
Rank in Denmark
#33
of 93
Research works
587
▲ 46% vs 2018-21
Citations
10k
17.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.3%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.08×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
60%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%
Central Denmark Region

What is Central Denmark Region known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Health SciencesDomain #2,044 of 9,902 12.5%125 #2270
MedicineField #2,077 of 8,541 13.3%94 #2296

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Central Denmark Region sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Central Denmark Region work in?

In 2022-now, 69% of research at Central Denmark Region is in Health Sciences, 19% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (53%), Health Professions (15%), Psychology (8%). It does 2.9× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 143 fractional works · 69.3% of its workMedicine: 110 fractional works · 53.2% of its workEmergency Medicine: 13 fractional works · 6.1% of its workSurgery: 11 fractional works · 5.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 10 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEpidemiology: 9 fractional works · 4.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 7 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 7 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 5 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPhysiology: 5 fractional works · 2.4% of its workOncology: 5 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 4 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 3 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPharmacology: 3 fractional works · 1.3% of its workRehabilitation: 3 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 3 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 3 fractional works · 1.2% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNephrology: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNeurology: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workFamily Practice: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workReproductive Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGastroenterology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 2 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Professions: 31 fractional works · 15.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 21 fractional works · 10.1% of its workOccupational Therapy: 3 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 2 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Information Management: 2 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacy: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 40 fractional works · 19.3% of its workPsychology: 16 fractional works · 7.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 8 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 3 fractional works · 1.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 14 fractional works · 6.7% of its workHealth: 4 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 2 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 6 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 6 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 6.1% of its workEngineering: 6 fractional works · 2.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 11 fractional works · 5.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 6 fractional works · 3.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 2.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKCentral DenmarkRegion207fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences69%Social Sciences19%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine11053.2%
    2. Health Professions3115.2%
    3. Nursing10.5%
    4. Dentistry10.4%
    1. Psychology167.6%
    2. Social Sciences146.7%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance62.8%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting21.1%
    5. Arts and Humanities10.6%
    6. Decision Sciences10.5%
    1. Engineering62.7%
    2. Environmental Science31.3%
    3. Computer Science20.8%
    4. Chemistry10.4%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.3%
    6. Mathematics00.2%
    7. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    8. Energy00.1%
    9. Materials Science00.1%
    10. Chemical Engineering00.0%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology63.0%
    2. Neuroscience31.6%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences10.4%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology10.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Central Denmark Region specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: General Health Professions takes 7.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. General Health ProfessionsSubfield · 20.9 works7.3×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.56× its world share, 6 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.38× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.99× its world share, 3 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.10× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.18× its world share, 6 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.26× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.80× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 5.76× its world share, 31 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.77× its world share, 110 worksMedicineNursing: 1.10× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.35× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.50× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.33× its world share, 6 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.48× its world share, 16 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.53× its world share, 14 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 24 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions5.76×31 works
  2. Medicine2.77×110 works
  3. Psychology2.48×16 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.33×6 works
  5. Nursing1.10×1 works
  6. Neuroscience0.99×3 works
  7. Dentistry0.80×1 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.56×6 works
  9. Social Sciences0.53×14 works
  10. Decision Sciences0.50×1 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology0.38×1 works
  12. Business, Management and Accounting0.35×2 works
  13. Environmental Science0.26×3 works
  14. Chemistry0.24×1 works
  15. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.20×1 works
  16. Arts and Humanities0.20×1 works
  17. Engineering0.18×6 works
  18. Mathematics0.16×0 works
  19. Energy0.15×0 works
  20. Computer Science0.10×2 works
  21. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.09×1 works
  22. Physics and Astronomy0.07×0 works
  23. Materials Science0.03×0 works
  24. Chemical Engineering0.01×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Central Denmark Region?

Ranked on the quality score, Karina Friis, Mikael Fink Vallentin and Ulla Væggemose lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Central Denmark Region.

  1. 1 Karina Friis Denmark · #403,936 worldwide 2.9k citations · 77 works
  2. 2 Mikael Fink Vallentin Denmark · #565,756 worldwide 644 citations · 36 works
  3. 3 Ulla Væggemose Denmark · #653,111 worldwide 574 citations · 58 works
  4. 4 Finn Breinholt Larsen Denmark · #993,986 worldwide 2.3k citations · 59 works
  5. 5 Lisbeth Ørtenblad Denmark · #1,025,808 worldwide 823 citations · 38 works
  6. 6 Marie Hauge Pedersen Denmark · #1,335,201 worldwide 364 citations · 16 works
  7. 7 Jes Bak Sørensen Denmark · #1,784,580 worldwide 771 citations · 37 works
  8. 8 Carsten Meilandt Denmark · #1,796,014 worldwide 253 citations · 15 works
  9. 9 Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl Denmark · #1,999,764 worldwide 319 citations · 22 works
  10. 10 Anne‐Mette Hedeager Momsen Denmark · #2,125,412 worldwide 1k citations · 53 works
All ranked researchers at Central Denmark Region

What are the most cited papers from Central Denmark Region?

The most cited paper from Central Denmark Region is "Association of National Initiatives to Improve Cardiac Arrest Management With Rates of Bystander Intervention and Patient Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest" (Mads Wissenberg, Freddy Knudsen Lippert, Fredrik Folke et al., 2013), with 1,219 citations. Next come "A genome-wide association study identifies CDHR3 as a susceptibility locus for early childhood asthma with severe exacerbations" (585) and "More Than Smell—COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis" (541).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Association of National Initiatives to Improve Cardiac Arrest Management With Rates of Bystander Intervention and Patient Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Mads Wissenberg, Freddy Knudsen Lippert, Fredrik Folke et al. · JAMA Oct 2013 1,219
2 A genome-wide association study identifies CDHR3 as a susceptibility locus for early childhood asthma with severe exacerbations Klaus Bønnelykke et al. · Nature Genetics 17 Nov 2013 585
3 More Than Smell—COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis Valentina Parma et al. · Chemical Senses Open access123 authors 12 Jun 2020 541
4 Register-based follow-up of social benefits and other transfer payments: Accuracy and degree of completeness in a Danish interdepartmental administrative database compared with a population-based survey Niels Henrik Hjøllund, Finn Breinholt Larsen, Johan Hviid Andersen · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 22 Sep 2007 495
5 An overview of ecological status, vulnerability and future perspectives of European large shallow, semi-enclosed coastal systems, lagoons and transitional waters Alice Newton et al. · Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Open access 13 Jun 2013 423
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Central Denmark Region?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Epidemiology, Depression, Resuscitation, Anxiety, Primary Care, Patient Satisfaction and Hypothermia.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology19▲ 2.4×60 topics
  2. Quality of Life17▲ 5.7×36 topics
  3. Depression11▲ 5.9×14 topics
  4. Public Health10▲ 3.4×20 topics
  5. Resuscitation9▲ 33×3 topics
  6. Anxiety9▲ 8.8×9 topics
  7. Primary Care8▲ 11×10 topics
  8. Inflammation8▲ 1.82×28 topics
  9. Patient Satisfaction8▲ 12×8 topics
  10. Cardiovascular Disease7▲ 3.0×17 topics
  11. Hypothermia7▲ 47×2 topics
  12. Survival Rates7▲ 36×2 topics
  13. Quality Improvement7▲ 17×8 topics
  14. Cardiac Arrest7▲ 60×1 topic
  15. Out-of-Hospital7▲ 60×1 topic
  16. Social Support7▲ 6.2×10 topics
  17. Global Burden7▲ 5.9×8 topics
  18. Mortality Risk6▲ 12×5 topics
  19. Clinical Outcomes6▲ 14×4 topics
  20. Clinical Trials6▲ 4.3×12 topics
  21. Mortality6▲ 5.0×10 topics
  22. Well-being6▲ 7.3×9 topics
  23. Health Disparities6▲ 10×5 topics
  24. Chronic Disease Management5▲ 13×5 topics
  25. Medical Education5▲ 9.3×9 topics
  26. Stress Management5▲ 24×2 topics
  27. Heart Failure5▲ 5.2×10 topics
  28. Social Relationships5▲ 26×2 topics
  29. Health Outcomes4▲ 8.0×6 topics
  30. Myocardial Infarction4▲ 9.2×5 topics
  31. Critical Care4▲ 8.5×7 topics
  32. Evidence-Based Practice4▲ 15×5 topics
  33. Health Equity4▲ 6.8×2 topics
  34. Neighborhood Effects4▲ 19×2 topics
  35. Loneliness4▲ 31×1 topic
  36. Socioeconomic Inequalities4▲ 31×1 topic
  37. Health Care Utilization4▲ 18×3 topics
  38. Functional Recovery4▲ 12×4 topics
  39. Health-related Quality of Life4▲ 7.7×4 topics
  40. Patient-Centered Care4▲ 24×3 topics

Which research topics does Central Denmark Region publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Health disparities and outcomes, Emergency and Acute Care Studies and Cardiac Health and Mental Health.

Cardiac Arrest and Resus…7Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation: 7 fractional worksHealth disparities and outcomes: 4 fractional worksEmergency and Acute Care Studies: 3 fractional worksCardiac Health and Mental Health: 3 fractional worksChronic Disease Management Strategies: 3 fractional worksHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life: 3 fractional worksMusculoskeletal pain and…2Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation: 2 fractional worksWorkplace Health and Well-being: 2 fractional worksStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: 2 fractional worksSimulation-Based Educati…2Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare: 2 fractional works
Emergency MedicineHealthCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEpidemiology5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Emergency Medicine 7 works
  2. 2 Health disparities and outcomes Health 4 works
  3. 3 Emergency and Acute Care Studies Emergency Medicine 3 works
  4. 4 Cardiac Health and Mental Health Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3 works
  5. 5 Chronic Disease Management Strategies Epidemiology 3 works
  6. 6 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 3 works
  7. 7 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 2 works
  8. 8 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 2 works
  9. 9 Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery Rehabilitation 2 works
  10. 10 Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare Physiology 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available60.1%not open39.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.4%domestic only74.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Central Denmark Region's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 46% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Central Denmark Region as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00060% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Central Denmark Region0.00085% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Central Denmark Region over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting10%20%Central Denmark Region14.1% in 2025all institutions10.0% in 20252020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 17.9% in 2017.

Other research institutions in Viborg

All research institutions in Viborg

Share Central Denmark Region's ranking

Central Denmark Region on Science Explorer

A card with Central Denmark Region's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Central Denmark Region. Posts are plain text and can be reported.