Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Elverum · Norway

Crisis Training

Research works
8
▲ 54% vs 2018-21
Citations
178
23.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
15.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
50%
world 40%
International
50%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Crisis Training is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Crisis Training work in?

In all years, 56% of research at Crisis Training is in Health Sciences, 26% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (52%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (12%), Immunology and Microbiology (6%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 4 fractional works · 56.2% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 52.1% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 8.1% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 7.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 5.8% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEquine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 26.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 11.5% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 5.4% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 6.4% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 11.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 5.5% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 6.0% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 5.0% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workALL ITS WORKCrisis Training8fractional works, all years
Life Sciences26%Physical Sciences11%Health Sciences56%Social Sciences6%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine452.1%
    2. Veterinary02.2%
    3. Health Professions01.0%
    4. Nursing00.8%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences111.5%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology06.4%
    3. Neuroscience04.3%
    4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.6%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics01.4%
    1. Environmental Science05.5%
    2. Computer Science03.7%
    3. Engineering01.4%
    4. Chemistry00.8%
    1. Psychology05.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from Crisis Training?

The most cited paper from Crisis Training is "Randomised controlled general practice trial of sertraline, exposure therapy and combined treatment in generalised social phobia" (Svein Blomhoff, Tone Tangen Haug, Kjell Hellström et al., 2001), with 218 citations. Next come "Long‐term efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab (CT‐P13) after switching from originator infliximab: open‐label extension of the NOR‐SWITCH trial" (123) and "The Norwegian naturalistic treatment study of depression in general practice (NORDEP)---I: randomised double blind study" (107).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Randomised controlled general practice trial of sertraline, exposure therapy and combined treatment in generalised social phobia Svein Blomhoff, Tone Tangen Haug, Kjell Hellström et al. · The British Journal of Psychiatry Open access Jul 2001 218
2 Long‐term efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab (CT‐P13) after switching from originator infliximab: open‐label extension of the NOR‐SWITCH trial Guro Løvik Goll et al. · Journal of Internal Medicine Open access 14 Feb 2019 123
3 The Norwegian naturalistic treatment study of depression in general practice (NORDEP)---I: randomised double blind study Ulrik Fredrik Malt, O. H. Robak, H-P. Madsbu et al. · BMJ Open access May 1999 107
4 A combined analysis of double‐blind trials of the efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin‐gastrointestinal therapeutic system, doxazosin standard and placebo in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia Roger Sinclair Kirby, Morten Tolstrup Andersen, P Gratzke et al. · British Journal of Urology Feb 2001 100
5 Quantification of leg oedema in postmenopausal hypertensive patients treated with lercanidipine or amlodipine Per Lund‐Johansen, Einar Stranden, Steiner Helberg et al. · Journal of Hypertension 29 Apr 2003 70
All 29 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Crisis Training publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Study of Mite Species, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, Bird parasitology and diseases and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management.

  1. 1 Study of Mite Species Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
  2. 2 Insect-Plant Interactions and Control Insect Science 0 works
  3. 3 Bird parasitology and diseases Parasitology 0 works
  4. 4 Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Epidemiology 0 works
  5. 5 Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  6. 6 Anatomy and Medical Technology Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques Surgery 0 works
  8. 8 Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
  9. 9 Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
  10. 10 Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available50.0%not open50.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors49.5%domestic only50.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Crisis Training's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 54% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Crisis Training as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000062% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Crisis Training0.0000056% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Crisis Training over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Elverum

All research institutions in Elverum

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Crisis Training. Posts are plain text and can be reported.