Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Oakland · United States

Dascena (United States)

dascena.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
50
▼ 44% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.5k
30.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
20.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
78%
world 40%
International
7%
world 18%
Dascena (United States)

Not ranked overall: Dascena (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Dascena (United States) work in?

In all years, 70% of research at Dascena (United States) is in Health Sciences, 26% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (61%), Computer Science (18%), Health Professions (8%). It does 2.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 35 fractional works · 70.1% of its workMedicine: 31 fractional works · 61.3% of its workEpidemiology: 8 fractional works · 15.1% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 4 fractional works · 7.0% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 3 fractional works · 6.3% of its workInternal Medicine: 3 fractional works · 5.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 5.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workHealth Informatics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workNephrology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 8.4% of its workHealth Information Management: 3 fractional works · 6.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 25.9% of its workComputer Science: 9 fractional works · 18.1% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 7 fractional works · 13.2% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKDascena (UnitedStates)50fractional works, all years
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences26%Health Sciences70%Social Sciences2%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 16 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine3161.3%
    2. Health Professions48.4%
    3. Dentistry00.4%
    1. Computer Science918.1%
    2. Engineering23.7%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.3%
    4. Environmental Science11.3%
    5. Mathematics00.8%
    6. Materials Science00.7%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.1%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology11.1%
    3. Neuroscience00.3%
    1. Social Sciences01.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.3%
    3. Decision Sciences00.2%
    4. Psychology00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Immunology and Microbiology: 1.91× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 3.30× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.45× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.58× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.77× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.09× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.72× its world share, 9 worksMedicine1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Computer Science, 3.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Computer Science3.30×4 works
  2. Medicine2.72×9 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.45×1 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology1.91×0 works
  5. Health Professions1.09×0 works
  6. Environmental Science0.77×1 works
  7. Neuroscience0.59×0 works
  8. Engineering0.58×2 works

Who are the top researchers at Dascena (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Ritankar Das, Jana L. Hoffman and Jacob S. Calvert lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Dascena (United States).

  1. 1 Ritankar Das United States · #192,603 worldwide 4.4k citations · 106 works
  2. 2 Jana L. Hoffman United States · #219,820 worldwide 2.8k citations · 68 works
  3. 3 Jacob S. Calvert United States · #224,298 worldwide 3.3k citations · 102 works
  4. 4 Abigail Green‐Saxena United States · #428,598 worldwide 1.4k citations · 45 works
  5. 5 Qingqing Mao United States · #462,635 worldwide 4.6k citations · 103 works
  6. 6 Angier O. Allen United States · #570,594 worldwide 693 citations · 31 works
  7. 7 Gina Barnes United States · #592,483 worldwide 1.1k citations · 60 works
  8. 8 Chak Foon Tso United States · #629,508 worldwide 1k citations · 22 works
  9. 9 Carson Lam United States · #639,753 worldwide 1.8k citations · 41 works
  10. 10 Emily Pellegrini United States · #803,564 worldwide 1k citations · 40 works
All ranked researchers at Dascena (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Dascena (United States)?

The most cited paper from Dascena (United States) is "Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach" (Thomas Desautels, Jacob S. Calvert, Jana L. Hoffman et al., 2016), with 542 citations. Next come "Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial" (404) and "Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU" (353).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach Thomas Desautels, Jacob S. Calvert, Jana L. Hoffman et al. · JMIR Medical Informatics Open access 30 Sep 2016 542
2 Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial David W. Shimabukuro, Christopher W. Barton, Mitchell D. Feldman et al. · BMJ Open Respiratory Research Open access Nov 2017 404
3 Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU Qingqing Mao, Melissa Jay, Jana L. Hoffman et al. · BMJ Open Open access 2018 353
4 A computational approach to early sepsis detection Jacob S. Calvert, Daniel A. Price, Uli K. Chettipally et al. · Computers in Biology and Medicine Open access 11 May 2016 259
5 Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs Christopher Barton, Uli K. Chettipally, Yifan Zhou et al. · Computers in Biology and Medicine Open access 23 Apr 2019 181
All 92 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Dascena (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Deep Learning, Healthcare, Epidemiology, Precision Medicine, Risk Factors, Critical Care, Biomarkers and Sepsis.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Deep Learning11▲ 10×10 topics
  2. Healthcare10▲ 27×4 topics
  3. Epidemiology9▲ 4.6×10 topics
  4. Machine Learning6▲ 5.8×9 topics
  5. Precision Medicine6▲ 41×2 topics
  6. Risk Factors6▲ 12×7 topics
  7. Critical Care6▲ 53×3 topics
  8. Biomarkers6▲ 18×2 topics
  9. Sepsis6▲ 70×2 topics
  10. Microcirculation5▲ 135×2 topics
  11. Electronic Health Records5▲ 168×2 topics
  12. Clinical Event Prediction5▲ 482×1 topic
  13. Management5▲ 13×2 topics
  14. Patient Similarity5▲ 482×1 topic
  15. Predictive Modeling5▲ 79×2 topics
  16. Prognostic Models5▲ 143×1 topic
  17. Septic Shock5▲ 141×1 topic
  18. Convolutional Neural Networks5▲ 23×4 topics
  19. Artificial Intelligence5▲ 11×2 topics
  20. COVID-195▲ 14×5 topics
  21. Medical Imaging5▲ 34×2 topics
  22. Transfer Learning4▲ 112×2 topics
  23. Chest X-Ray4▲ 281×1 topic
  24. Pneumonia Detection4▲ 281×1 topic
  25. Diagnosis3▲ 6.7×3 topics
  26. Treatment3▲ 5.2×2 topics
  27. Data Mining3▲ 14×3 topics
  28. Clinical Practice Guidelines3▲ 11×3 topics
  29. Global Burden3▲ 11×3 topics
  30. Logistic Regression3▲ 158×2 topics
  31. Big Data Analytics3▲ 71×1 topic
  32. Medical Diagnosis3▲ 149×1 topic
  33. Antithrombotic Therapy3▲ 51×1 topic
  34. Guidelines3▲ 11×4 topics
  35. Venous Thromboembolism3▲ 79×1 topic
  36. Prevention Guidelines2▲ 48×2 topics
  37. Pandemic2▲ 9.1×4 topics
  38. Revascularization2▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Ischemic Stroke2▲ 30×1 topic
  40. Neuroprotection2▲ 11×2 topics

Which research topics does Dascena (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Machine Learning in Healthcare, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications.

Machine Learning in Heal…2Machine Learning in Healthcare: 2 fractional worksSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment: 1 fractional worksCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI: 1 fractional worksRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications: 1 fractional worksVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management: 1 fractional worksAcute Ischemic Stroke Management: 1 fractional works3D Surveying and Cultura…13D Surveying and Cultural Heritage: 1 fractional worksHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Neural Network Applications: 0 fractional worksAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects: 0 fractional works
Artificial IntelligenceEpidemiologyRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingEnvironmental Engineering5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Machine Learning in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  2. 2 Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 1 works
  3. 3 COVID-19 diagnosis using AI Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
  4. 4 Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications Environmental Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management Internal Medicine 1 works
  6. 6 Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Epidemiology 1 works
  7. 7 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage Geology 1 works
  8. 8 Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring Surgery 0 works
  9. 9 Advanced Neural Network Applications Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  10. 10 Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available77.8%not open22.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors6.8%domestic only93.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Dascena (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 44% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Dascena (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000093% in 2023.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%Dascena (United States)0.000043% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Dascena (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Oakland

All research institutions in Oakland

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Dascena (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.