Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Corvallis · United States

ECD for the Masses (United States)

e-msion.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
13
▼ 7% vs 2018-21
Citations
307
23.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
20.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
72%
world 40%
International
47%
world 18%
ECD for the Masses (United States)

Not ranked overall: ECD for the Masses (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does ECD for the Masses (United States) work in?

In all years, 41% of research at ECD for the Masses (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 25% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Chemistry (17%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (16%), Medicine (16%).

Physical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 40.6% of its workChemistry: 2 fractional works · 17.3% of its workSpectroscopy: 2 fractional works · 17.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 7.7% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 1 fractional works · 7.7% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 24.5% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 16.3% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 18.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 6.1% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workClassics: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 16.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 16.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 9.8% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKECD for theMasses (United…13fractional works, all years
Life Sciences17%Physical Sciences41%Health Sciences25%Social Sciences18%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Chemistry217.3%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences17.7%
    3. Engineering16.9%
    4. Computer Science16.0%
    5. Environmental Science02.2%
    6. Materials Science00.6%
    1. Medicine216.3%
    2. Health Professions15.7%
    3. Dentistry02.5%
    1. Social Sciences110.4%
    2. Arts and Humanities15.1%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting02.5%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology216.4%
    2. Neuroscience00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5.13× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.71× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 15.15× its world share, 1 worksChemistryEnvironmental Science: 0.93× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 3.52× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.80× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 6.42× its world share, 1 worksArts and Humanities1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemistry, 15.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Chemistry15.15×1 works
  2. Arts and Humanities6.42×1 works
  3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology5.13×1 works
  4. Health Professions3.52×0 works
  5. Environmental Science0.93×0 works
  6. Medicine0.80×1 works
  7. Neuroscience0.71×0 works

What are the most cited papers from ECD for the Masses (United States)?

The most cited paper from ECD for the Masses (United States) is "Sequencing Grade Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Top–Down Proteomics Using Hybrid Electron Capture Dissociation Methods in a Benchtop Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer" (Jared Shaw, Neha Malhan, Yury V. Vasil’ev et al., 2018), with 89 citations. Next come "Direct Determination of Antibody Chain Pairing by Top-down and Middle-down Mass Spectrometry Using Electron Capture Dissociation and Ultraviolet Photodissociation" (83) and "Exploring ECD on a Benchtop Q Exactive Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer" (82).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sequencing Grade Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Top–Down Proteomics Using Hybrid Electron Capture Dissociation Methods in a Benchtop Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer Jared Shaw, Neha Malhan, Yury V. Vasil’ev et al. · Analytical Chemistry Open access 17 Aug 2018 89
2 Direct Determination of Antibody Chain Pairing by Top-down and Middle-down Mass Spectrometry Using Electron Capture Dissociation and Ultraviolet Photodissociation Jared Shaw, Weijing Liu, Yury V. Vasil’ev et al. · Analytical Chemistry Open access 26 Nov 2019 83
3 Exploring ECD on a Benchtop Q Exactive Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer Kyle L. Fort, Christian N. Cramer, Valery G. Voinov et al. · Journal of Proteome Research Open access 18 Dec 2017 82
4 Comparative Structural Analysis of 20S Proteasome Ortholog Protein Complexes by Native Mass Spectrometry Shay Vimer, Gili Ben‐Nissan, David A. Morgenstern et al. · ACS Central Science Open access 10 Apr 2020 67
5 Top-Down Characterization of Denatured Proteins and Native Protein Complexes Using Electron Capture Dissociation Implemented within a Modified Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer Jonathan P. Williams, Lindsay J. Morrison, Jeffery M. Brown et al. · Analytical Chemistry Open access 30 Jan 2020 64
All 23 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does ECD for the Masses (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, Indigenous Studies and Ecology, Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications.

Mass Spectrometry Techni…0Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksIndigenous Studies and E…0Indigenous Studies and Ecology: 0 fractional worksHistorical, Literary, an…0Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Proteomics Tech…0Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksLinguistics and language evolution: 0 fractional worksAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography: 0 fractional worksBacteriophages and micro…0Bacteriophages and microbial interactions: 0 fractional worksMitochondrial Function and Pathology: 0 fractional worksIon channel regulation and function: 0 fractional worksMonoclonal and Polyclona…0Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research: 0 fractional works
SpectroscopyGeneral Health ProfessionsClassicsLanguage and Linguistics3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications Spectroscopy 0 works
  2. 2 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies Classics 0 works
  4. 4 Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications Spectroscopy 0 works
  5. 5 Linguistics and language evolution Language and Linguistics 0 works
  6. 6 Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography Spectroscopy 0 works
  7. 7 Bacteriophages and microbial interactions Ecology 0 works
  8. 8 Mitochondrial Function and Pathology Molecular Biology 0 works
  9. 9 Ion channel regulation and function Molecular Biology 0 works
  10. 10 Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available72.5%not open27.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors46.9%domestic only53.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has ECD for the Masses (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 7% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting20052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is ECD for the Masses (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000035% in 2023.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%ECD for the Masses (United States)0.00000034% in 202520102020

Fractional works of ECD for the Masses (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Corvallis

All research institutions in Corvallis

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about ECD for the Masses (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.