Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications is a research topic within Spectroscopy. Science Explorer counts 27k research works in it since 1950. 24.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers covers advancements in mass spectrometry techniques, with a focus on proteomics, quantitative analysis, protein identification, phosphoproteomics, and biomarker discovery. It includes topics such as label-free quantification, tandem mass spectrometry, protein phosphorylation, and data-independent acquisition.
- Proteomics
- Mass Spectrometry
- Quantitative Analysis
- Protein Identification
- Phosphoproteomics
- Biomarker Discovery
- Label-free Quantification
- Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- Protein Phosphorylation
- Data-independent Acquisition
- Research works
- 27k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 6.5k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 24.3% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -7% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (977 and 642 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 977 works
- 2 China 642 works
- 3 Germany 247 works
- 4 United Kingdom 155 works
- 5 India 133 works
- 6 Canada 115 works
- 7 France 106 works
- 8 Japan 98 works
- 9 Spain 70 works
- 10 Netherlands 70 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of Washington publishes the most Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research, followed by University of Wisconsin–Madison and Chinese Academy of Sciences.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of WashingtonUnited States 25 works
- 2 University of Wisconsin–MadisonUnited States 23 works
- 3 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 18 works
- 4 Harvard UniversityUnited States 15 works
- 5 University of CopenhagenDenmark 15 works
- 6 Fudan UniversityChina 15 works
- 7 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 14 works
- 8 University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 14 works
- 9 Technical University of MunichGermany 13 works
- 10 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 13 works
Who are the leading researchers in Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications include Vamsi K. Mootha, Amanda G. Paulovich and Matthias Mann.
- 1 Vamsi K. Mootha United States 6.9k citations
- 2 Amanda G. Paulovich United States 5.5k citations
- 3 Matthias Mann Germany 5.1k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research done?
The largest centres of Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Paris (France) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Madison, Seattle and Copenhagen.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- MadisonUS · 28.2 works7.0×
- SeattleUS · 39.4 works6.2×
- CopenhagenDK · 33.1 works5.8×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications?
Among universities, judged by research, University of Copenhagen, University of Washington and University of Wisconsin–Madison score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of CopenhagenDenmark | 55.2 | 32.2% | 6.8× | 15 | +20.1% |
| 2 | University of WashingtonUnited States | 54.8 | 25.4% | 7.3× | 25 | -19.9% |
| 3 | University of Wisconsin–MadisonUnited States | 54.0 | 26.6% | 7.5× | 23 | -17.9% |
| 4 | Northeastern UniversityUnited States | 53.8 | 39.5% | 8.9× | 9 | +24.9% |
| 5 | Michigan State UniversityUnited States | 51.3 | 53.6% | 4.1× | 10 | +72.8% |
| 6 | University of OklahomaUnited States | 51.3 | 35.4% | 9.6× | 8 | — |
| 7 | Technical University of MunichGermany | 46.8 | 37.0% | 4.8× | 13 | +8.9% |
| 8 | Karolinska InstitutetSweden | 45.2 | 35.3% | 6.1× | 9 | -17.9% |
| 9 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 43.5 | 32.1% | 3.7× | 15 | +0.5% |
| 10 | Baylor College of MedicineUnited States | 39.8 | 29.2% | 6.6× | 9 | +56.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2012. The fastest-growing topics are Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.