Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Spokane · United States

Empire Technical Development (United States)

empirelabauto.com/index.htmlROR OpenAlex
Research works
34
▲ 44% vs 2018-21
Citations
232
6.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
54%
world 40%
International
28%
world 18%
Empire Technical Development (United States)

Not ranked overall: Empire Technical Development (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Empire Technical Development (United States) work in?

In all years, 44% of research at Empire Technical Development (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 34% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (26%), Social Sciences (17%), Medicine (14%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 15 fractional works · 44.3% of its workEngineering: 9 fractional works · 26.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workArchitecture: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 10.4% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEnergy Engineering and Power Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMetals and Alloys: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 34.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 16.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 5.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 4.5% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 7 fractional works · 20.0% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 13.9% of its workUrology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKEmpire TechnicalDevelopment…34fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences44%Health Sciences20%Social Sciences34%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering926.3%
    2. Computer Science410.4%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences12.4%
    4. Environmental Science12.0%
    5. Energy01.0%
    6. Materials Science01.0%
    7. Chemistry00.6%
    8. Physics and Astronomy00.6%
    1. Social Sciences616.7%
    2. Arts and Humanities26.5%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting24.5%
    4. Decision Sciences13.2%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.1%
    6. Psychology00.4%
    1. Medicine513.9%
    2. Health Professions25.8%
    3. Veterinary00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.0%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 2.16× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.17× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 2.50× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 2.32× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.57× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.58× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.37× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 5.54× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.71× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.89× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 5.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences5.54×1 works
  2. Arts and Humanities2.58×1 works
  3. Energy2.50×0 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting2.37×1 works
  5. Engineering2.32×5 works
  6. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.17×0 works
  7. Computer Science2.16×2 works
  8. Social Sciences0.89×2 works
  9. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.71×0 works
  10. Environmental Science0.57×0 works
  11. Health Professions0.44×0 works
  12. Psychology0.34×0 works
  13. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.17×0 works
  14. Medicine0.15×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.12×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Empire Technical Development (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Jean-Michel Gros lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Empire Technical Development (United States).

  1. 1 Jean-Michel Gros United States · #4,020,692 worldwide 34 citations · 23 works
All ranked researchers at Empire Technical Development (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Empire Technical Development (United States)?

The most cited paper from Empire Technical Development (United States) is "Lung Lobectomy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Refractory Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis in a Dog" (Kaylyn McDaniel, Kristen A. McDaniel, Jared A. Jaffey et al., 2015), with 143 citations. Next come "Treatments for Alzheimer Disease" (37) and "Long-term viable bioaerosol sampling using a temperature- and humidity-controlled filtration apparatus, a laboratory investigation using culturable E. coli." (12).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Lung Lobectomy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Refractory Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis in a Dog Kaylyn McDaniel, Kristen A. McDaniel, Jared A. Jaffey et al. · Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 12 Mar 2015 143
2 Treatments for Alzheimer Disease Darryl K. Potyk · Southern Medical Journal Jun 2005 37
3 Long-term viable bioaerosol sampling using a temperature- and humidity-controlled filtration apparatus, a laboratory investigation using culturable E. coli. Howard J. Walls, Jean Kim, Robert Yaga et al. · Aerosol Science and Technology Open access 27 Jan 2017 12
4 Addressing barriers to perinatal care: a case study of the Access to Maternity Care Committee in Washington State. D Schleuning, Gregory Rice, Roger A Rosenblatt · PubMed 22 Mar 1991 12
5 New development of expert system module for a decision-making on mine stope stability in underground blasthole mining operations S. Vongpaisal, G. Li, Rimas Pakalnis et al. · International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment Mar 2011 7
All 17 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Empire Technical Development (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cultural Heritage, Gender, Primary Care, Sustainability, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Machine Vision, Data Sharing and Scientific Data Management.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 21 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 21 words, with their numbers
  1. Sustainability2▲ 3.5×6 topics
  2. Cultural Heritage2▲ 13×3 topics
  3. Gender2▲ 8.8×5 topics
  4. Mental Health2▲ 4.1×3 topics
  5. Primary Care2▲ 10×3 topics
  6. Data Sharing1▲ 186×1 topic
  7. Intelligent Transportation Systems1▲ 43×2 topics
  8. Machine Vision1▲ 20×4 topics
  9. Scientific Data Management1▲ 239×1 topic
  10. Social Media1▲ 4.9×2 topics
  11. Culture1▲ 7.4×4 topics
  12. Healthcare Legislation1▲ 48×1 topic
  13. History1▲ 4.3×4 topics
  14. Open Access1▲ 40×2 topics
  15. Patient Rights1▲ 35×1 topic
  16. Design1▲ 24×2 topics
  17. Digital Communication1▲ 41×1 topic
  18. Hair Follicle1▲ 193×1 topic
  19. Information Studies1▲ 132×1 topic
  20. Stem Cells1▲ 9.8×1 topic
  21. Urbanism1▲ 93×2 topics

Which research topics does Empire Technical Development (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Research Data Management Practices, Optics and Image Analysis, Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems and Architecture and Art History Studies.

Research Data Management…1Research Data Management Practices: 1 fractional worksOptics and Image Analysis1Optics and Image Analysis: 1 fractional worksInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems: 1 fractional worksArchitecture and Art History Studies: 1 fractional worksTransportation and Mobility Innovations: 1 fractional worksTraffic control and management: 1 fractional worksArchitecture, Modernity, and Design: 1 fractional worksVehicular Ad Hoc Network…1Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): 1 fractional worksEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management: 0 fractional worksScientific Computing and Data Management: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsManagement Information SystemsSociology and Political ScienceVisual Arts and Performing Arts6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 1 works
  2. 2 Optics and Image Analysis Management Information Systems 1 works
  3. 3 Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  4. 4 Architecture and Art History Studies Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1 works
  5. 5 Transportation and Mobility Innovations Automotive Engineering 1 works
  6. 6 Traffic control and management Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
  7. 7 Architecture, Modernity, and Design Architecture 1 works
  8. 8 Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1 works
  9. 9 Environmental Monitoring and Data Management Geology 0 works
  10. 10 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available53.7%not open46.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.5%domestic only72.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Empire Technical Development (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 44% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Empire Technical Development (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000036% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Empire Technical Development (United States)0.000088% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Empire Technical Development (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Spokane

All research institutions in Spokane

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Empire Technical Development (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.