Gardner–Webb University
In research, Gardner–Webb University stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,526 of 16,945 worldwide), Social Sciences (#8,192 of 10,206 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#17,432 of 20,462 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #34,090 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #7,259 of 8,685
- Research works
- 590 ▼ 71% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.4k 4.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 58% world 28%
What is Gardner–Webb University known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,526 of 16,945 | 7.5% | 381 | |
| Social SciencesField | #8,192 of 10,206 | 7.7% | 201 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #17,432 of 20,462 | 3.0% | 153 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Gardner–Webb University sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.9×
- Nursing 3.9×
- Arts and Humanities 3.7×
- Social Sciences 3.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.9×
- Health Professions 1.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Energy 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Gardner–Webb University?
Ranked on the composite score, James R. McConnell lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Gardner–Webb University.
- 1 James R. McConnell United States · #584,415 worldwide 11 citations · 46 works
Which keywords describe research at Gardner–Webb University?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Well-being, Religion, Gender, Academic Achievement, Health, Child Development, Quality of Life and Reflective Practice.
- Ethnic Minority Business
- Advertising
- Sport
- Qualitative Research Methods
- Fan Culture
- Masculinity
- Social Support
- School Engagement
- Leisure
- Constraints
- Technology Integration
- Social Capital
- History
- Qualitative Research
- Identity
- Mental Health
- Child Development
- Health
- Religion
- Quality of Life
- Well-being
- Gender
- Academic Achievement
- Social Media
- Feminism
- Reflective Practice
- Self-Regulation
- Student Perceptions
- Literature
- Teacher Professional Development
- Community Development
- Ethics
- Professional Development
- Social Movements
- Student-Teacher Relationships
- Community Engagement
- Nursing Education
- Social Constructionism
- Teacher Identity
- Co-Teaching
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Well-being3▲ 16×5 topics
- Quality of Life2▲ 3.8×4 topics
- Gender2▲ 9.6×5 topics
- Religion2▲ 11×6 topics
- Academic Achievement2▲ 30×6 topics
- Health2▲ 12×2 topics
- Social Media2▲ 2.9×4 topics
- Child Development2▲ 9.4×2 topics
- Feminism2▲ 14×4 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 2.7×5 topics
- Reflective Practice2▲ 21×3 topics
- Identity2▲ 5.2×3 topics
- Self-Regulation2▲ 20×2 topics
- Qualitative Research2▲ 3.9×5 topics
- Student Perceptions2▲ 19×6 topics
- History2▲ 4.6×4 topics
- Literature2▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Social Capital2▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Teacher Professional Development1▲ 19×2 topics
- Technology Integration1▲ 10×3 topics
- Community Development1▲ 15×3 topics
- Constraints1▲ 230×1 topic
- Ethics1▲ 6.0×6 topics
- Leisure1▲ 114×1 topic
- Professional Development1▲ 15×3 topics
- School Engagement1▲ 62×1 topic
- Social Movements1▲ 9.6×3 topics
- Social Support1▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Student-Teacher Relationships1▲ 62×1 topic
- Masculinity1▲ 30×2 topics
- Community Engagement1▲ 7.2×3 topics
- Fan Culture1▲ 89×1 topic
- Nursing Education1▲ 18×3 topics
- Qualitative Research Methods1▲ 63×1 topic
- Social Constructionism1▲ 70×3 topics
- Sport1▲ 60×1 topic
- Teacher Identity1▲ 65×1 topic
- Advertising1▲ 52×2 topics
- Co-Teaching1▲ 156×1 topic
- Ethnic Minority Business1▲ 83×1 topic
Which research topics does Gardner–Webb University publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management, Early Childhood Education and Development, Sports, Gender, and Society and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management Social Psychology 1 works
- 2 Early Childhood Education and Development Education 1 works
- 3 Sports, Gender, and Society Gender Studies 1 works
- 4 Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Education 1 works
- 5 Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion Education 1 works
- 7 Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Health 1 works
- 8 Race, History, and American Society Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 9 Media, Gender, and Advertising Gender Studies 1 works
- 10 Parental Involvement in Education Education 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Gardner–Webb University's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 71% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.