Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Wilmington · United States

Goldey–Beacom College

gbc.eduROR OpenAlex
Research works
106
▲ 54% vs 2018-21
Citations
763
7.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
30%
world 40%
International
7%
world 18%
Goldey–Beacom College

Not ranked overall: Goldey–Beacom College is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Goldey–Beacom College work in?

In 2022-now, 60% of research at Goldey–Beacom College is in Social Sciences, 32% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (30%), Social Sciences (22%), Arts and Humanities (10%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 26 fractional works · 60.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 10 fractional works · 22.4% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 5 fractional works · 11.1% of its workSafety Research: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArts and Humanities: 4 fractional works · 10.3% of its workConservation: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMusic: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 10.0% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 2 fractional works · 3.8% of its workManagement Information Systems: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4 fractional works · 8.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPhysical Sciences: 14 fractional works · 31.9% of its workComputer Science: 13 fractional works · 29.6% of its workInformation Systems: 7 fractional works · 15.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 4 fractional works · 9.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGeometry and Topology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.3% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workHealth Informatics: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLeadership and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workALL ITS WORKGoldey–BeacomCollege43fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences32%Health Sciences5%Social Sciences60%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1022.4%
    2. Arts and Humanities410.3%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting410.0%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance48.8%
    5. Psychology24.8%
    6. Decision Sciences23.8%
    1. Computer Science1329.6%
    2. Mathematics11.5%
    3. Engineering00.8%
    1. Medicine24.1%
    2. Nursing01.1%
    1. Neuroscience11.9%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.18× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 3.81× its world share, 13 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringMathematics: 1.30× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsMedicine: 0.22× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 2.35× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 3.58× its world share, 4 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3.09× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.96× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.12× its world share, 4 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.57× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.77× its world share, 10 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 13 fields, with their numbers
  1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.12×4 works
  2. Decision Sciences3.96×2 works
  3. Computer Science3.81×13 works
  4. Arts and Humanities3.58×4 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting3.09×4 works
  6. Nursing2.35×0 works
  7. Social Sciences1.77×10 works
  8. Psychology1.57×2 works
  9. Mathematics1.30×1 works
  10. Neuroscience1.18×1 works
  11. Medicine0.22×2 works
  12. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.14×0 works
  13. Engineering0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Goldey–Beacom College?

Ranked on the quality score, Russell Michalak, Fatma Abdel‐Raouf and Monica Rysavy lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Goldey–Beacom College.

  1. 1 Russell Michalak United States · #1,245,721 worldwide 453 citations · 62 works
  2. 2 Fatma Abdel‐Raouf United States · #3,220,783 worldwide 33 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Monica Rysavy United States · #6,016,584 worldwide 348 citations · 184 works
All ranked researchers at Goldey–Beacom College

What are the most cited papers from Goldey–Beacom College?

The most cited paper from Goldey–Beacom College is "Working from Home: How We Managed Our Team Remotely with Technology" (Monica Rysavy, Russell Michalak, 2020), with 88 citations. Next come "Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students" (81) and "Using dimensions of moral intensity to predict ethical decision-making in accounting" (64).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Working from Home: How We Managed Our Team Remotely with Technology Monica Rysavy, Russell Michalak · Journal of Library Administration Jun 2020 88
2 Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students Deborah L. Leitsch · Journal of Business Ethics 26 Aug 2004 81
3 Using dimensions of moral intensity to predict ethical decision-making in accounting Deborah L. Leitsch · Accounting Education Jun 2006 64
4 Students' perceptions of their information literacy skills: the confidence gap between male and female international graduate students Russell Michalak, Monica Rysavy, Alison Wessel · The Journal of Academic Librarianship 14 Feb 2017 48
5 From Ethics to Execution: The Role of Academic Librarians in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy-Making at Colleges and Universities Russell Michalak · Journal of Library Administration 3 Oct 2023 45
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Goldey–Beacom College?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Academic Libraries, Machine Learning, Digital Repositories, Digital Divide, User-Centered Design and Security.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Artificial Intelligence6▲ 9.7×5 topics
  2. Machine Learning5▲ 3.5×6 topics
  3. Big Data5▲ 11×5 topics
  4. Academic Libraries4▲ 456×3 topics
  5. Digital Repositories3▲ 207×2 topics
  6. Digital Divide3▲ 26×2 topics
  7. Security3▲ 8.9×6 topics
  8. User-Centered Design3▲ 219×2 topics
  9. Leadership2▲ 12×3 topics
  10. Digital Literacy2▲ 9.8×1 topic
  11. Information Literacy2▲ 22×1 topic
  12. Library Services2▲ 529×1 topic
  13. Social Inclusion2▲ 180×1 topic
  14. Data Citation2▲ 104×2 topics
  15. Healthcare2▲ 4.7×3 topics
  16. Internet of Things2▲ 5.6×3 topics
  17. Surveillance2▲ 17×2 topics
  18. Archives2▲ 346×1 topic
  19. Digital Preservation2▲ 304×1 topic
  20. Data Sharing2▲ 139×1 topic
  21. Educational Technology2▲ 3.8×3 topics
  22. Ethics2▲ 8.6×2 topics
  23. Scientific Data Management2▲ 168×1 topic
  24. Supply Chain Management2▲ 4.9×3 topics
  25. Employee Engagement2▲ 22×2 topics
  26. Precision Medicine2▲ 8.0×2 topics
  27. Algorithmic Bias2▲ 42×1 topic
  28. Chatbots2▲ 52×1 topic
  29. Fairness2▲ 35×1 topic
  30. Service Robots2▲ 37×1 topic
  31. Investment2▲ 30×2 topics
  32. Meta-Analysis2▲ 5.9×3 topics
  33. Semantic Web2▲ 36×2 topics
  34. Clinical Decision Support1▲ 20×1 topic
  35. Medical Imaging1▲ 6.1×1 topic
  36. Global1▲ 89×1 topic
  37. Reading Comprehension1▲ 50×2 topics
  38. Talent Management1▲ 72×1 topic
  39. Linked Data1▲ 68×1 topic
  40. Privacy1▲ 10×3 topics

Which research topics does Goldey–Beacom College publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Library Science and Information Literacy, Library Science and Administration, Digital and Traditional Archives Management and Research Data Management Practices.

Library Science and Info…2Library Science and Information Literacy: 2 fractional worksLibrary Science and Admi…2Library Science and Administration: 2 fractional worksDigital and Traditional …2Digital and Traditional Archives Management: 2 fractional worksResearch Data Management…2Research Data Management Practices: 2 fractional worksEthics and Social Impacts of AI: 2 fractional worksAI in Service Interactions: 2 fractional worksArtificial Intelligence …1Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education: 1 fractional worksHuman Resource and Talen…1Human Resource and Talent Management: 1 fractional worksLibrary Science and Info…1Library Science and Information Systems: 1 fractional worksLibrary Collection Devel…1Library Collection Development and Digital Resources: 1 fractional works
Library and Information SciencesConservationInformation SystemsSafety Research3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Library Science and Information Literacy Library and Information Sciences 2 works
  2. 2 Library Science and Administration Library and Information Sciences 2 works
  3. 3 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 2 works
  4. 4 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 2 works
  5. 5 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 2 works
  6. 6 AI in Service Interactions Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  7. 7 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 1 works
  8. 8 Human Resource and Talent Management Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works
  9. 9 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 1 works
  10. 10 Library Collection Development and Digital Resources Information Systems 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.4%not open69.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors6.9%domestic only93.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Goldey–Beacom College's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 54% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Goldey–Beacom College as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00022% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Goldey–Beacom College0.00015% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Goldey–Beacom College over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Wilmington

All research institutions in Wilmington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Goldey–Beacom College. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.