Historical Archives
In research, Historical Archives stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,787 of 10,521 worldwide), Arts and Humanities (#1,316 of 1,998 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,613 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in History — History is 27.9× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #20,245 of 28,054 · #19,948 all time
- Rank in Hungary
- #79 of 118
- Research works
- 1.4k ▲ 76% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.1k 2.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.6% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 60% world 28%
What is Historical Archives known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,787 of 10,521 | 8.2% | 231 | #5403 | |
| Arts and HumanitiesField | #1,316 of 1,998 | 12.9% | 101 | #1866 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,613 of 6,365 | 4.9% | 111 | #4878 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Historical Archives sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#5,403 #5,787
- Arts and Humanities#1,866 #1,316
- Social Sciences#4,878 #5,613
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Historical Archives specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: History takes 27.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- HistorySubfield · 25.3 works28×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 12.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 12.3×
- Social Sciences 3.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.1×
- Psychology 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Veterinary 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Energy 0.0×
- Materials Science 0.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Historical Archives?
Ranked on the composite score, Benjamin Suchoff, Saad Khizar Bosal and Harold T. Pinkett lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Historical Archives.
- 1 Benjamin Suchoff Hungary · #450,761 worldwide 13 citations · 23 works
- 2 Saad Khizar Bosal Hungary · #575,975 worldwide 0 citations · 18 works
- 3 Harold T. Pinkett Hungary · #729,490 worldwide 4 citations · 20 works
- 4 Torbjörn Ahlström Hungary · #947,591 worldwide 21 citations · 17 works
- 5 Lara Conte Hungary · #1,085,103 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 6 Elisabeth Iregren Hungary · #1,126,343 worldwide 27 citations · 21 works
- 7 Gérald Hungary · #1,397,436 worldwide 2 citations · 20 works
- 8 Ola Magnell Hungary · #1,448,796 worldwide 4 citations · 16 works
- 9 Maja Dolinar Hungary · #1,541,076 worldwide 0 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Historical Archives?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Identity, Nationalism, Gender, History, Cultural Heritage, Colonialism, Metadata Standards and Archives.
- Sociology
- Eastern Mediterranean
- Ethnography
- Ethnicity
- European Union
- Ethics
- Public Policy
- Archaeology
- Cultural Studies
- Culture
- Memory
- Religion
- Eastern Europe
- Urban Development
- Literature
- Digital Preservation
- Metadata Standards
- Cultural Heritage
- Gender
- Globalization
- Identity
- Nationalism
- History
- Colonialism
- Archives
- Innovation
- Soviet Union
- Cultural Exchange
- International Relations
- Migration
- Cultural History
- Human Rights
- Social History
- Religious Identity
- Cold War
- National Identity
- Diplomacy
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Byzantium
- Geopolitics
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Identity20▲ 10.0×34 topics
- Globalization19▲ 3.4×40 topics
- Nationalism16▲ 13×17 topics
- Gender16▲ 10×22 topics
- History16▲ 7.8×23 topics
- Cultural Heritage14▲ 9.2×24 topics
- Colonialism14▲ 11×24 topics
- Metadata Standards13▲ 242×2 topics
- Archives13▲ 382×1 topic
- Digital Preservation13▲ 328×1 topic
- Innovation12▲ 4.1×16 topics
- Literature12▲ 7.9×27 topics
- Soviet Union12▲ 73×3 topics
- Urban Development12▲ 11×6 topics
- Cultural Exchange12▲ 31×6 topics
- Eastern Europe11▲ 72×3 topics
- International Relations11▲ 17×11 topics
- Religion11▲ 8.4×12 topics
- Migration10▲ 11×11 topics
- Memory10▲ 15×8 topics
- Cultural History10▲ 28×12 topics
- Culture9▲ 6.3×18 topics
- Human Rights9▲ 3.1×16 topics
- Cultural Studies9▲ 8.4×16 topics
- Social History8▲ 33×8 topics
- Archaeology8▲ 20×8 topics
- Religious Identity8▲ 44×6 topics
- Public Policy8▲ 5.4×9 topics
- Cold War7▲ 41×4 topics
- Ethics7▲ 5.4×15 topics
- National Identity7▲ 23×5 topics
- European Union7▲ 11×6 topics
- Diplomacy7▲ 26×6 topics
- Ethnicity7▲ 6.3×8 topics
- Cultural Diplomacy6▲ 28×4 topics
- Ethnography6▲ 13×8 topics
- Byzantium6▲ 110×1 topic
- Eastern Mediterranean6▲ 110×1 topic
- Geopolitics6▲ 13×5 topics
- Sociology6▲ 14×7 topics
Which research topics does Historical Archives publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Digital and Traditional Archives Management, Byzantine Studies and History, Polish Historical and Cultural Studies and Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 13 works
- 2 Byzantine Studies and History Classics 6 works
- 3 Polish Historical and Cultural Studies Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 4 Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 5 Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland History 4 works
- 6 Central European and Russian historical studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 7 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 8 Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends Demography 4 works
- 9 Italian Fascism and Post-war Society Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 10 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Historical Archives's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 76% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Budapest
- Eötvös Loránd University
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- Semmelweis University
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics
- Corvinus University of Budapest
- Obuda University
- Ludovika University of Public Service
- University of Veterinary Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.