Institute for Fiscal Studies
In research, Institute for Fiscal Studies stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,004 of 10,521 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#3,581 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Economics and Econometrics and Economics, Econometrics and Finance — Economics and Econometrics is 10.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #15,664 of 28,054 · #7,226 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #565 of 1,094
- Research works
- 2.5k ▲ 28% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 71k 28.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 29.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 30% world 28%
What is Institute for Fiscal Studies known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,004 of 10,521 | 30.2% | 141 | #1070 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,581 of 6,365 | 31.7% | 71 | #1563 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for Fiscal Studies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Institute for Fiscal Studies specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Economics and Econometrics takes 10.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Economics and EconometricsSubfield · 30.6 works10×
- Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField · 36.9 works9.3×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 9.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 3.5×
- Health Professions 3.1×
- Social Sciences 3.0×
- Psychology 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.5×
- Nursing 1.3×
- Mathematics 0.7×
- Energy 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Veterinary 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Institute for Fiscal Studies?
Ranked on the composite score, Stephen Bond, Rachel Griffith and Eric French lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- 1 Stephen Bond United Kingdom · #36,287 worldwide 4.5k citations · 31 works
- 2 Rachel Griffith United Kingdom · #59,351 worldwide 285 citations · 50 works
- 3 Eric French United Kingdom · #62,302 worldwide 291 citations · 32 works
- 4 Richard Disney United Kingdom · #97,096 worldwide 294 citations · 62 works
- 5 Martin O’Connell United Kingdom · #98,138 worldwide 324 citations · 59 works
- 6 James Banks United Kingdom · #122,470 worldwide 223 citations · 70 works
- 7 Steven Β. Webb United Kingdom · #234,825 worldwide 132 citations · 33 works
- 8 Barbara Sianesi United Kingdom · #270,423 worldwide 465 citations · 15 works
- 9 Mónica Costa Dias United Kingdom · #278,989 worldwide 170 citations · 16 works
- 10 J.B.M. Vranken United Kingdom · #307,429 worldwide 8 citations · 32 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute for Fiscal Studies?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Economic Growth, Globalization, Labor Market, Fiscal Policy, Income Inequality, Gender Inequality, Economic Development and Income Tax.
- Retirement Planning
- Multinational Firms
- Corporate Tax
- Financial Literacy
- Institutional Quality
- Job Insecurity
- Welfare Reform
- Social Responsibility
- Social Determinants of Health
- Infrastructure
- Consumer Behavior
- Labor Force Participation
- Unemployment
- Financial Reporting
- Political Economy
- Social Policy
- Income Tax
- Gender Inequality
- Fiscal Policy
- Globalization
- Economic Growth
- Labor Market
- Income Inequality
- Economic Development
- Mental Health
- Health Outcomes
- Education
- Tax Avoidance
- Taxation
- Regional Development
- Corruption
- Public Investment
- Incentives
- Household Decision Making
- Economic Crisis
- Precarious Employment
- Behavioral Economics
- Asset Allocation
- Investment Decisions
- Household Finance
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Economic Growth20▲ 12×16 topics
- Globalization19▲ 5.3×25 topics
- Labor Market16▲ 29×6 topics
- Fiscal Policy15▲ 38×6 topics
- Income Inequality15▲ 58×4 topics
- Gender Inequality14▲ 54×5 topics
- Economic Development13▲ 8.8×13 topics
- Income Tax13▲ 87×2 topics
- Mental Health11▲ 4.1×14 topics
- Social Policy11▲ 60×2 topics
- Health Outcomes10▲ 20×4 topics
- Political Economy10▲ 20×9 topics
- Education10▲ 3.0×15 topics
- Financial Reporting9▲ 42×5 topics
- Tax Avoidance9▲ 112×2 topics
- Unemployment9▲ 54×2 topics
- Taxation8▲ 51×3 topics
- Labor Force Participation8▲ 95×2 topics
- Regional Development8▲ 12×4 topics
- Consumer Behavior7▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Corruption7▲ 24×4 topics
- Infrastructure7▲ 30×1 topic
- Public Investment7▲ 62×1 topic
- Social Determinants of Health7▲ 16×3 topics
- Incentives7▲ 52×3 topics
- Social Responsibility6▲ 15×4 topics
- Household Decision Making6▲ 154×1 topic
- Welfare Reform6▲ 154×1 topic
- Economic Crisis6▲ 28×2 topics
- Job Insecurity6▲ 52×1 topic
- Precarious Employment6▲ 52×1 topic
- Institutional Quality6▲ 30×3 topics
- Behavioral Economics6▲ 59×2 topics
- Financial Literacy6▲ 37×2 topics
- Asset Allocation6▲ 70×2 topics
- Corporate Tax6▲ 100×1 topic
- Investment Decisions6▲ 25×2 topics
- Multinational Firms6▲ 51×1 topic
- Household Finance6▲ 92×1 topic
- Retirement Planning6▲ 92×1 topic
Which research topics does Institute for Fiscal Studies publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics, Employment and Welfare Studies and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 7 works
- 2 Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics Gender Studies 6 works
- 3 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 6 works
- 4 Corporate Taxation and Avoidance Accounting 6 works
- 5 Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis Accounting 6 works
- 6 Taxation and Compliance Studies Economics and Econometrics 5 works
- 7 Social Policy and Reform Studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 8 Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare Safety Research 4 works
- 9 Global Health Care Issues General Health Professions 4 works
- 10 Taxation and Legal Issues Accounting 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for Fiscal Studies's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 28% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.