Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics is a research topic within Gender Studies. Science Explorer counts 32k research works in it since 1950. 28.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the intersection of gender inequality, labor force dynamics, welfare reform, and household decision making. It delves into topics such as the impact of income tax policies on female labor supply, the effects of welfare reform on work incentives, and the role of gender in shaping economic development and intrahousehold resource allocation.

  • Gender Inequality
  • Labor Force Participation
  • Welfare Reform
  • Income Tax
  • Household Decision Making
  • Economic Development
  • Female Labor Supply
  • Intrahousehold Allocation
  • Social Policy
  • Work and Family
Research works
32k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
9.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
28.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+12%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.4k and 290 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.4k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 290 works
  3. 3 India 267 works
  4. 4 Germany 227 works
  5. 5 Indonesia 218 works
  6. 6 China 195 works
  7. 7 Italy 138 works
  8. 8 Australia 134 works
  9. 9 Türkiye 122 works
  10. 10 Spain 120 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 45.1%United Kingdom: 9.3%India: 8.6%Germany: 7.3%6 others listed: 29.7%45%largest
United States1,407 · 45.1%United Kingdom290 · 9.3%India267 · 8.6%Germany227 · 7.3%6 others listed926 · 29.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, IZA - Institute of Labor Economics publishes the most Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research, followed by Sapienza University of Rome and University of Michigan.

Who are the leading researchers in Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics include Robert J. Barro, Joseph E. Stiglitz and Richard Blundell.

  1. 1 Robert J. Barro United States 7.9k citations
  2. 2 Joseph E. Stiglitz United States 7.4k citations
  3. 3 Richard Blundell United Kingdom 5.2k citations
  4. 4 Gary S. Becker United States 4.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research done?

The largest centres of Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research in 2022–2025 are Washington D.C. (United States), London (United Kingdom), New York (United States) and Beijing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bonn and Washington D.C..

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Washington D.C. United States 113 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 96 works
  3. 3 New York United States 71 works
  4. 4 Beijing China 53 works
  5. 5 Rome Italy 49 works
  6. 6 Cambridge United States 46 works
  7. 7 Tokyo Japan 42 works
  8. 8 Bonn Germany 40 works
  9. 9 New Delhi India 37 works
  10. 10 Chicago United States 37 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BonnDE · 40.3 works12×
  2. Washington D.C.US · 112.9 works6.5×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics than the world average.

See Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics on the map

Where is the best place to study Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics?

Among universities, judged by research, Bocconi University, London School of Economics and Political Science and University of Wisconsin–Madison score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 29.29%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Bocconi University: 10, 51.2%London School of Economics and Political Science: 20, 30.0%University of Wisconsin–Madison: 22, 37.6%Australian National University: 21, 20.5%Sapienza University of Rome: 30, 11.5%National University of Singapore: 9, 51.2%University of Michigan: 29, 24.5%University of California, Berkeley: 16, 33.7%University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 27, 14.6%University of Essex: 9, 18.1%Bocconi UniversityUniversity of Wiscon…London School of Eco…Australian National …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Bocconi UniversityItaly 65.051.2%24.7×10 +3.1%
2 London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom 59.930.0%18.5×20 +0.6%
3 University of Wisconsin–MadisonUnited States 53.737.6%5.1×22 +50.9%
4 Australian National UniversityAustralia 52.420.5%9.3×21 +6.4%
5 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 47.611.5%5.9×30 +125.8%
6 National University of SingaporeSingapore 47.551.2%2.0×9 +86.4%
7 University of MichiganUnited States 44.524.5%4.7×29 -10.0%
8 University of California, BerkeleyUnited States 43.633.7%4.1×16 +35.5%
9 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 42.614.6%3.4×27 +170.1%
10 University of EssexUnited Kingdom 42.618.1%12.6×9 +25.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.