Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Campinas · Brazil

Instituto Penido Burnier

Research works
50
▼ 26% vs 2018-21
Citations
116
2.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.4%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
80%
world 40%
International
22%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Instituto Penido Burnier is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Instituto Penido Burnier work in?

In all years, 76% of research at Instituto Penido Burnier is in Health Sciences, 13% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (72%), Social Sciences (7%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (5%). It does 2.8× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 38 fractional works · 76.0% of its workMedicine: 36 fractional works · 71.9% of its workOphthalmology: 8 fractional works · 16.8% of its workSurgery: 6 fractional works · 11.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 3 fractional works · 5.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 13.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 7.3% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 9.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSensory Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKInstituto PenidoBurnier50fractional works, all years
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences76%Social Sciences13%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine3671.9%
    2. Dentistry12.3%
    3. Health Professions00.9%
    4. Nursing00.7%
    5. Veterinary00.1%
    1. Social Sciences47.3%
    2. Psychology12.8%
    3. Arts and Humanities12.0%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.8%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    6. Decision Sciences00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology24.7%
    2. Neuroscience23.4%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.7%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.1%
    1. Engineering00.7%
    2. Environmental Science00.4%
    3. Chemistry00.4%
    4. Computer Science00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.57× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 3.85× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 6.78× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceEngineering: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.21× its world share, 5 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.34× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.48× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.61× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 6.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Neuroscience6.78×1 works
  2. Immunology and Microbiology3.85×0 works
  3. Medicine3.21×5 works
  4. Psychology1.48×0 works
  5. Arts and Humanities1.34×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.61×1 works
  7. Health Professions0.59×0 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.57×0 works
  9. Decision Sciences0.50×0 works
  10. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.23×0 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.10×0 works
  12. Engineering0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Instituto Penido Burnier?

Ranked on the quality score, Mateus Pimenta Arruda, Luiz Marciano Cangiani and Luís Otávio Esteves lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Instituto Penido Burnier.

  1. 1 Mateus Pimenta Arruda Brazil · #2,284,852 worldwide 19 citations · 17 works
  2. 2 Luiz Marciano Cangiani Brazil · #4,228,850 worldwide 102 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Luís Otávio Esteves Brazil · #4,510,077 worldwide 77 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Elvira Barbosa Abreu Brazil · #4,734,669 worldwide 31 citations · 19 works
  5. 5 Ricardo Francisco Simoni Brazil · #4,931,369 worldwide 151 citations · 26 works
All ranked researchers at Instituto Penido Burnier

What are the most cited papers from Instituto Penido Burnier?

The most cited paper from Instituto Penido Burnier is "Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints" (Raquel Mezzalira, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Bittar, Marcia Maria do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky et al., 2017), with 50 citations. Next come "Efficacy Of Intraoperative Methadone And Clonidine In Pain Control In The Immediate Postoperative Period After The Use Of Remifentanil" (30) and "Moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis" (22).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints Raquel Mezzalira, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Bittar, Marcia Maria do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky et al. · Clinics Open access 2017 50
2 Efficacy Of Intraoperative Methadone And Clonidine In Pain Control In The Immediate Postoperative Period After The Use Of Remifentanil Ricardo Francisco Simoni, Luiz Marciano Cangiani, Antônio Márcio Sanfim Arantes Pereira et al. · Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Open access Jul 2009 30
3 Moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis José R. Arrieta, Alejandro S. Galgano, Eulália Sakano et al. · American Journal of Otolaryngology Mar 2007 22
4 Eficácia do emprego da metadona ou da clonidina no intraoperatório para controle da dor pós-operatória imediata após uso de remifentanil Ricardo Francisco Simoni, Luiz Marciano Cangiani, Antônio Márcio Sanfim Arantes Pereira et al. · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) Open access Aug 2009 15
5 Bloqueio do nervo frênico após realização de bloqueio do plexo braquial pela via interescalênica: relato de caso Luis Henrique Cangiani, Luis Augusto Edwards Rezende, Armando Giancoli Neto · Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Open access 13 Mar 2008 14
All 86 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Instituto Penido Burnier?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Quality of Life, Glaucoma, Optical Coherence Tomography, Genetic Mutations, Pain Management, Postoperative Pain and Prognostic Factors.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology8▲ 3.8×25 topics
  2. Quality of Life4▲ 5.7×9 topics
  3. Glaucoma3▲ 37×3 topics
  4. Optical Coherence Tomography3▲ 49×2 topics
  5. Genetic Mutations2▲ 9.5×4 topics
  6. Treatment2▲ 3.7×7 topics
  7. Pain Management2▲ 20×3 topics
  8. Postoperative Pain2▲ 46×3 topics
  9. Risk Factors2▲ 4.3×3 topics
  10. Perioperative Care2▲ 36×2 topics
  11. Prognostic Factors2▲ 9.3×7 topics
  12. Public Health2▲ 3.1×8 topics
  13. Macular Degeneration2▲ 32×3 topics
  14. COVID-192▲ 5.8×4 topics
  15. Diabetic Retinopathy2▲ 46×2 topics
  16. Optic Nerve2▲ 38×2 topics
  17. Analgesia2▲ 51×2 topics
  18. Chronic Pain2▲ 15×1 topic
  19. Guidelines2▲ 7.7×2 topics
  20. Intraocular Pressure2▲ 35×2 topics
  21. Patient Satisfaction2▲ 15×2 topics
  22. Postoperative Nausea2▲ 189×1 topic
  23. Regional Anesthesia2▲ 63×1 topic
  24. Vomiting Prevention2▲ 189×1 topic
  25. Sedation2▲ 40×2 topics
  26. Anesthesia2▲ 28×3 topics
  27. Ocular Findings2▲ 123×1 topic
  28. Retinal Artery Occlusion2▲ 123×1 topic
  29. Pharmacokinetics2▲ 11×2 topics
  30. Radiation Therapy2▲ 20×2 topics
  31. Rehabilitation2▲ 8.0×4 topics
  32. Bispectral Index Monitoring1▲ 63×1 topic
  33. Dexmedetomidine1▲ 63×1 topic
  34. Graves' Ophthalmopathy1▲ 108×1 topic
  35. Myopia1▲ 43×2 topics
  36. Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy1▲ 108×1 topic
  37. Retinoblastoma1▲ 148×1 topic
  38. Thrombus Formation1▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Uveal Melanoma1▲ 148×1 topic
  40. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor1▲ 26×2 topics

Which research topics does Instituto Penido Burnier publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Ocular Oncology and Treatments, Ear Surgery and Otitis Media, Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment.

  1. 1 Ocular Oncology and Treatments Ophthalmology 0 works
  2. 2 Ear Surgery and Otitis Media Otorhinolaryngology 0 works
  3. 3 Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics Sensory Systems 0 works
  4. 4 Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment Genetics 0 works
  5. 5 Retinal Diseases and Treatments Ophthalmology 0 works
  6. 6 Cancer and Skin Lesions Dermatology 0 works
  7. 7 Rural and Ethnic Education Education 0 works
  8. 8 Arts and Performance Studies Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
  9. 9 Philosophy and Education Pedagogy Health 0 works
  10. 10 Vestibular and auditory disorders Neurology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available80.0%not open20.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors21.7%domestic only78.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Instituto Penido Burnier's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 26% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Instituto Penido Burnier as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000066% in 2024.

still counting0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%Instituto Penido Burnier0.000015% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Instituto Penido Burnier over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Campinas

All research institutions in Campinas

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Instituto Penido Burnier. Posts are plain text and can be reported.