Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Intempora (France)

Research works
9
▲ 448% vs 2018-21
Citations
189
20.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
65%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Intempora (France) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Intempora (France) work in?

In all years, 39% of research at Intempora (France) is in Social Sciences, 36% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (25%), Social Sciences (18%), Engineering (11%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 4 fractional works · 38.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 18.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 10.7% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.1% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 36.5% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 25.2% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 12.7% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 4.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSoftware: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 11.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 21.7% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 10.6% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 4.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKIntempora(France)9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences36%Health Sciences22%Social Sciences39%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences218.5%
    2. Arts and Humanities110.7%
    3. Decision Sciences04.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting03.5%
    5. Psychology01.8%
    1. Computer Science225.2%
    2. Engineering111.3%
    1. Medicine110.6%
    2. Health Professions17.6%
    3. Dentistry03.5%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences03.0%
    2. Neuroscience00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.61× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 3.73× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.77× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringDentistry: 17.92× its world share, 0 worksDentistryMedicine: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 4.52× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 1.43× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.03× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 17.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry17.92×0 works
  2. Arts and Humanities4.52×0 works
  3. Computer Science3.73×1 works
  4. Psychology1.43×0 works
  5. Social Sciences1.03×0 works
  6. Medicine0.90×1 works
  7. Engineering0.77×0 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.61×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Intempora (France)?

The most cited paper from Intempora (France) is "Vehicle yaw, pitch, roll and 3D lane shape recovery by vision" (P. Coulombeau, Claude Laurgeau, 2003), with 37 citations. Next come "AGATHE: A tool for personalized rehabilitation of cognitive functions based on simulated activities of daily living" (23) and "Control Architecture Concepts and Properties of an Ontology Devoted to Exchanges in Mobile Robotics" (21).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Vehicle yaw, pitch, roll and 3D lane shape recovery by vision P. Coulombeau, Claude Laurgeau Conference paper Oct 2003 37
2 AGATHE: A tool for personalized rehabilitation of cognitive functions based on simulated activities of daily living Évelyne Klinger, Abdelmajid Kadri, É. Sorita et al. · IRBM Open access 16 Mar 2013 23
3 Control Architecture Concepts and Properties of an Ontology Devoted to Exchanges in Mobile Robotics Saadia Dhouib, Nicolas Du, Jean-Loup Farges et al. Open access 24 May 2011 21
4 PUVAME - New French Approach for Vulnerable Road Users Safety Olivier Aycard, Anne Spalanzani, Manuel Yguel et al. Conference paper 22 Sep 2006 19
5 Facing ADAS validation complexity with usage oriented testing Laurent Raffaelli, Frederique Vallée, Guy Fayolle et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) PreprintOpen access 22 Feb 2016 15
All 16 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Intempora (France) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts, Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms and Robotics and Automated Systems.

  1. 1 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
  2. 2 Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies Cultural Studies 0 works
  3. 3 Robotic Path Planning Algorithms Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  4. 4 Robotics and Automated Systems Control and Systems Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Oncology 0 works
  6. 6 Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Oral Surgery 0 works
  7. 7 French Literature and Critical Theory Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  8. 8 Soft tissue tumor case studies Rheumatology 0 works
  9. 9 Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  10. 10 Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available65.2%not open34.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.2%domestic only74.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Intempora (France)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 448% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting20052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Intempora (France) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000018% in 2024.

still counting0.000020%0.000040%Intempora (France)0.0000029% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Intempora (France) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Issy-les-Moulineaux

All research institutions in Issy-les-Moulineaux

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Intempora (France). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.