Leverhulme Trust
In research, Leverhulme Trust stands highest in Physical Sciences (#3,343 of 10,670 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#3,004 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #3,957 of 22,385 · #2,598 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #183 of 862
- Research works
- 809 ▲ 14% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 21k 25.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 22.3% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.25× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 55% world 40%
- International
- 33% world 18%
What is Leverhulme Trust known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #3,343 of 10,670 | 22.8% | 61 | #3019 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #3,004 of 9,585 | 24.3% | 80 | #1570 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Leverhulme Trust sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Leverhulme Trust work in?
In 2022-now, 43% of research at Leverhulme Trust is in Social Sciences, 35% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Environmental Science (17%), Computer Science (7%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences9142.6%
- Social Sciences5325.0%
- Arts and Humanities136.2%
- Psychology125.8%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance73.1%
- Business, Management and Accounting31.6%
- Decision Sciences20.9%
- Physical Sciences7434.8%
- Environmental Science3616.8%
- Computer Science157.0%
- Engineering62.9%
- Materials Science62.7%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences52.4%
- Chemistry21.0%
- Mathematics21.0%
- Energy10.4%
- Physics and Astronomy10.4%
- Chemical Engineering00.2%
- Health Sciences2511.8%
- Medicine156.9%
- Health Professions73.2%
- Veterinary31.3%
- Dentistry10.4%
- Nursing00.0%
- Life Sciences2310.9%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 9.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Veterinary9.25×3 works
- Environmental Science3.38×36 works
- Neuroscience2.55×9 works
- Arts and Humanities2.15×13 works
- Social Sciences1.98×53 works
- Psychology1.90×12 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.51×5 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.44×7 works
- Health Professions1.23×7 works
- Decision Sciences0.97×2 works
- Computer Science0.90×15 works
- Mathematics0.82×2 works
- Dentistry0.81×1 works
- Materials Science0.77×6 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.68×7 works
- Chemistry0.64×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.58×7 works
- Chemical Engineering0.56×0 works
- Energy0.48×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.48×3 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.36×0 works
- Medicine0.36×15 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.29×1 works
- Engineering0.19×6 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.17×1 works
- Nursing0.03×0 works
- Veterinary 9.2×
- Environmental Science 3.4×
- Neuroscience 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 2.1×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Psychology 1.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.4×
- Health Professions 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Computer Science 0.9×
- Mathematics 0.8×
- Dentistry 0.8×
- Materials Science 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Chemical Engineering 0.6×
- Energy 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Nursing 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Leverhulme Trust?
Ranked on the quality score, David M. Brazel, Erika Milburn and Heather Doran lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Leverhulme Trust.
- 1
David M. Brazel
United Kingdom · #319,282 worldwide 4.6k citations · 33 works
- 2
Erika Milburn
United Kingdom · #3,253,273 worldwide 14 citations · 18 works
- 3
Heather Doran
United Kingdom · #3,608,668 worldwide 99 citations · 44 works
- 4
Grant Thomson
United Kingdom · #3,665,188 worldwide 69 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Leverhulme Trust?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Ethics, Climate Change, Biodiversity Conservation, Big Data, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Biodiversity and Discrimination.
- Model Evaluation
- Ethical Issues
- Citizen Science
- Labor Market
- Functional Diversity
- Community Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Ecosystem
- Species Richness
- Health Disparities
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Global Change
- Conservation
- Algorithmic Bias
- Transparency
- Fairness
- Globalization
- Biodiversity
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
- Climate Change
- Ethics
- Big Data
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Discrimination
- Surveillance
- Accountability
- Invasive Species
- Land Use Change
- Ecosystem Services
- Emotion
- Population Dynamics
- Biological Invasions
- Evolution
- Social-Ecological Systems
- Ecosystem Resilience
- Environmental Services
- Tropical Deforestation
- Soil Properties
- Life Expectancy
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change18▲ 3.1×49 topics
- Machine Learning16▲ 2.3×24 topics
- Ethics12▲ 11×13 topics
- Artificial Intelligence11▲ 3.8×14 topics
- Big Data11▲ 5.2×11 topics
- Biodiversity9▲ 5.7×17 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation9▲ 12×13 topics
- Globalization8▲ 2.0×30 topics
- Discrimination8▲ 18×3 topics
- Fairness8▲ 35×2 topics
- Surveillance8▲ 13×2 topics
- Transparency7▲ 24×2 topics
- Accountability7▲ 27×1 topic
- Algorithmic Bias7▲ 40×1 topic
- Invasive Species6▲ 7.1×9 topics
- Conservation6▲ 6.8×10 topics
- Land Use Change6▲ 9.8×5 topics
- Global Change5▲ 9.1×4 topics
- Ecosystem Services5▲ 6.0×9 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation5▲ 10×3 topics
- Emotion4▲ 9.5×7 topics
- Health Disparities4▲ 7.4×7 topics
- Population Dynamics4▲ 7.5×8 topics
- Species Richness4▲ 29×2 topics
- Biological Invasions4▲ 20×3 topics
- Ecosystem4▲ 17×2 topics
- Evolution4▲ 6.4×7 topics
- Conservation Biology4▲ 16×4 topics
- Social-Ecological Systems4▲ 12×3 topics
- Community Ecology4▲ 19×1 topic
- Ecosystem Resilience4▲ 11×5 topics
- Functional Diversity4▲ 30×1 topic
- Environmental Services3▲ 46×1 topic
- Labor Market3▲ 5.6×6 topics
- Tropical Deforestation3▲ 46×1 topic
- Citizen Science3▲ 14×2 topics
- Soil Properties3▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Ethical Issues3▲ 11×5 topics
- Life Expectancy3▲ 23×2 topics
- Model Evaluation3▲ 10×2 topics
Which research topics does Leverhulme Trust publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management and Species Distribution and Climate Change.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 7 works
- 2 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 4 works
- 3 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 3 works
- 4 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 3 works
- 5 Fire effects on ecosystems Global and Planetary Change 2 works
- 6 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 2 works
- 7 Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Cognitive Neuroscience 2 works
- 8 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 2 works
- 9 Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations Cognitive Neuroscience 2 works
- 10 Health disparities and outcomes Health 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Leverhulme Trust's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 14% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Leverhulme Trust as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00080% in 2024.
Fractional works of Leverhulme Trust over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 29.5% in 2024.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Barts Health NHS Trust
- Brunel University of London
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Leverhulme Trust. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
