Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen
In research, Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen stands highest in Social Sciences (#11,758 of 14,833 worldwide), Social Sciences (#7,981 of 9,330 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#14,520 of 16,688 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #14,886 of 22,385 · #14,500 all time
- Rank in Norway
- #83 of 123
- Research works
- 938 ▲ 146% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 3.5k 3.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.6% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.01× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 29% world 40%
- International
- 13% world 18%
What is Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #11,758 of 14,833 | 10.6% | 338 | |
| Social SciencesField | #7,981 of 9,330 | 8.1% | 144 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #14,520 of 16,688 | 5.5% | 449 | |
| MedicineField | #12,718 of 14,558 | 5.9% | 282 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #3,142 of 3,315 | 4.9% | 159 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen work in?
In 2022-now, 54% of research at Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen is in Social Sciences, 35% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Medicine (21%), Health Professions (14%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences5753.9%
- Social Sciences2725.2%
- Psychology1413.3%
- Business, Management and Accounting98.4%
- Arts and Humanities33.2%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance32.7%
- Decision Sciences11.1%
- Health Sciences3734.8%
- Medicine2220.6%
- Health Professions1413.6%
- Nursing10.5%
- Veterinary00.1%
- Physical Sciences98.1%
- Environmental Science33.2%
- Computer Science21.8%
- Mathematics21.4%
- Engineering10.9%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.7%
- Energy00.1%
- Materials Science00.1%
- Life Sciences33.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 22 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions5.14×14 works
- Psychology4.35×14 works
- Business, Management and Accounting2.62×9 works
- Social Sciences1.99×27 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.27×3 works
- Mathematics1.21×2 works
- Decision Sciences1.17×1 works
- Arts and Humanities1.12×3 works
- Medicine1.07×22 works
- Nursing1.07×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.97×0 works
- Veterinary0.77×0 works
- Environmental Science0.65×3 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.50×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.42×1 works
- Neuroscience0.31×0 works
- Computer Science0.23×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.20×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.15×1 works
- Energy0.09×0 works
- Engineering0.06×1 works
- Materials Science0.02×0 works
- Health Professions 5.1×
- Psychology 4.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.3×
- Mathematics 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.2×
- Arts and Humanities 1.1×
- Medicine 1.1×
- Nursing 1.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.0×
- Veterinary 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen?
Ranked on the quality score, A Bjørndal, Martin Tesdal and ARVE LYSTAD lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen.
- 1
A Bjørndal
Norway · #3,394,925 worldwide 900 citations · 72 works
- 2
Martin Tesdal
Norway · #3,534,321 worldwide 55 citations · 15 works
- 3
ARVE LYSTAD
Norway · #3,906,572 worldwide 1.5k citations · 98 works
- 4
Bergljot Baklien
Norway · #5,327,959 worldwide 181 citations · 39 works
- 5
Hjort Pf
Norway · #5,438,683 worldwide 135 citations · 72 works
- 6
Peter Nedergaard
Norway · #7,681,491 worldwide 0 citations · 288 works
Which keywords describe research at Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Embodiment, Tacit Knowledge, Social Science, Pragmatism, Ethical Guidelines, Interactional Expertise, Mental Health and Health Disparities.
- Social Determinants of Health
- Methodology
- Chronic Diseases
- Infectious Diseases
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Medical Interpreters
- Anxiety
- Primary Care
- Healthcare Communication
- Pedagogy
- Judicial Review
- Democracy
- Depression
- Qualitative Research
- Human Rights
- Public Health
- Interactional Expertise
- Pragmatism
- Epidemiology
- Tacit Knowledge
- Embodiment
- Mental Health
- Social Science
- Ethical Guidelines
- Education
- Health Disparities
- Globalization
- Quality of Care
- Constitutionalism
- European Legal Systems
- COVID-19
- Cultural Competence
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Health Effects
- Language Barriers
- Social Sciences
- Communication
- Neoliberalism
- Integrated Care
- Phenomenology
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Embodiment7▲ 34×3 topics
- Tacit Knowledge6▲ 127×3 topics
- Mental Health6▲ 4.1×16 topics
- Epidemiology6▲ 1.45×29 topics
- Social Science6▲ 155×2 topics
- Pragmatism6▲ 221×2 topics
- Ethical Guidelines6▲ 101×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise6▲ 496×1 topic
- Education5▲ 2.9×13 topics
- Public Health5▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Health Disparities5▲ 17×4 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 4.2×7 topics
- Globalization4▲ 2.1×19 topics
- Qualitative Research4▲ 4.4×8 topics
- Quality of Care4▲ 43×3 topics
- Depression4▲ 3.7×10 topics
- Constitutionalism3▲ 37×2 topics
- Democracy3▲ 9.3×2 topics
- European Legal Systems3▲ 91×1 topic
- Judicial Review3▲ 37×1 topic
- COVID-193▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Pedagogy3▲ 5.5×6 topics
- Cultural Competence3▲ 19×2 topics
- Healthcare Communication3▲ 29×2 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome3▲ 3.2×4 topics
- Primary Care3▲ 6.7×8 topics
- Health Effects2▲ 3.9×5 topics
- Anxiety2▲ 4.5×5 topics
- Language Barriers2▲ 119×1 topic
- Medical Interpreters2▲ 119×1 topic
- Social Sciences2▲ 15×3 topics
- Stakeholder Engagement2▲ 24×4 topics
- Communication2▲ 6.2×4 topics
- Infectious Diseases2▲ 5.8×3 topics
- Neoliberalism2▲ 5.4×9 topics
- Chronic Diseases2▲ 6.6×4 topics
- Integrated Care2▲ 42×2 topics
- Methodology2▲ 35×3 topics
- Phenomenology2▲ 16×3 topics
- Social Determinants of Health2▲ 7.4×3 topics
Which research topics does Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research, European and International Law Studies, Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare and Nutritional Studies and Diet.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 6 works
- 2 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 3 works
- 3 Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare General Health Professions 2 works
- 4 Nutritional Studies and Diet Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 5 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 6 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 1 works
- 7 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 1 works
- 8 Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 9 Migration, Health and Trauma Clinical Psychology 1 works
- 10 Social and Educational Sciences Education 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 146% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00053% in 2024.
Fractional works of Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 17.4% in 2014.
Other research institutions in Oslo
- University of Oslo
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Norwegian Cancer Society
- BI Norwegian Business School
- Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
- Norsk Hydro (Norway)
- The Research Council of Norway
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
