Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Gaithersburg · United States

Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation

Research works
7
▲ 241% vs 2018-21
Citations
89
12.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
26.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
71%
world 40%
International
63%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation work in?

In all years, 50% of research at Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation is in Health Sciences, 50% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (46%), Medicine (46%), Health Professions (3%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Health Sciences: 4 fractional works · 49.8% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 45.7% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 12.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 11.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 7.0% of its workAnatomy: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLife Sciences: 4 fractional works · 49.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 45.7% of its workGenetics: 3 fractional works · 45.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workALL ITS WORKOsteogenesisImperfecta…7fractional works, all years
Life Sciences50%Health Sciences50%Social Sciences1%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 7 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine345.7%
    2. Health Professions02.9%
    3. Nursing01.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology345.7%
    2. Neuroscience02.2%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology01.5%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 8.60× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.48× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.43× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceHealth Professions: 1.76× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.17× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 3.88× its world share, 0 worksNursingEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 8.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology8.60×2 works
  2. Nursing3.88×0 works
  3. Immunology and Microbiology2.48×0 works
  4. Medicine2.17×2 works
  5. Health Professions1.76×0 works
  6. Neuroscience1.43×0 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.50×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation?

Ranked on the quality score, Tracy Smith Hart and Ingunn Westerheim lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation.

  1. 1 Tracy Smith Hart United States · #1,794,419 worldwide 646 citations · 43 works
  2. 2 Ingunn Westerheim United States · #1,816,117 worldwide 156 citations · 27 works
All ranked researchers at Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation

What are the most cited papers from Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation?

The most cited paper from Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation is "Initial report of the osteogenesis imperfecta adult natural history initiative" (Laura Lowe Tosi, Matthew E. Oetgen, Marianne Floor et al., 2015), with 98 citations. Next come "A cross‐sectional multicenter study of osteogenesis imperfecta in North America – results from the linked clinical research centers" (87) and "Growth characteristics in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta in North America: results from a multicenter study" (54).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Initial report of the osteogenesis imperfecta adult natural history initiative Laura Lowe Tosi, Matthew E. Oetgen, Marianne Floor et al. · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Open access 14 Nov 2015 98
2 A cross‐sectional multicenter study of osteogenesis imperfecta in North America – results from the linked clinical research centers Ruchita Patel, Sandesh C.S. Nagamani, David D Cuthbertson et al. · Clinical Genetics Open access 22 Apr 2014 87
3 Growth characteristics in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta in North America: results from a multicenter study Mahim Jain et al. · Genetics in Medicine Open access 2 Jul 2018 54
4 Cesarean delivery is not associated with decreased at-birth fracture rates in osteogenesis imperfecta Sunil Bellur, Mahim Jain, David D Cuthbertson et al. · Genetics in Medicine Open access Oct 2015 53
5 A multicenter study to evaluate pulmonary function in osteogenesis imperfecta Allison Tam et al. · Clinical Genetics Open access 28 Aug 2018 47
All 35 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Connective tissue disorders research, Bone fractures and treatments, Child Abuse and Related Trauma and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders.

  1. 1 Connective tissue disorders research Genetics 2 works
  2. 2 Bone fractures and treatments Epidemiology 1 works
  3. 3 Child Abuse and Related Trauma Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  4. 4 Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders Genetics 0 works
  5. 5 Medical and Biological Sciences Anatomy 0 works
  6. 6 Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research Genetics 0 works
  7. 7 Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare Speech and Hearing 0 works
  8. 8 Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders Immunology 0 works
  9. 9 Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  10. 10 Williams Syndrome Research Developmental Neuroscience 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available71.1%not open28.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors62.9%domestic only37.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 241% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000023% in 2024.

still counting0.000010%0.000020%0.000030%Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation0.000020% in 20252020

Fractional works of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Gaithersburg

All research institutions in Gaithersburg

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.